Skip to main content

Washington as a One Crisis Town

  • Chapter
Vietnam, Jews and the Middle East
  • 38 Accesses

Abstract

In 1964, American policy makers studied their options in Vietnam; in 1965, they reached decisions; by 1966, they began confronting the domestic and global ramifications of those decisions and Washington became a “one crisis town”. In 1964, administration analysts had predicted that “the US would probably find itself progressively isolated in the event that US sanctions did not soon achieve either a Communist reduction of pressure on South Vietnam or some progress toward meaningful negotiations.”1 By 1966, it became clear that the sanctions had not worked, there were no negotiations, and American allies and clients were distancing themselves from Washington in general and the Vietnam War in particular. This distancing helped harden Hanoi’s heart, radicalize the Soviet position, and undermine public support for the War.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. Robert McNamara, In Retrospect (New York: 1994), 266; Pentagon Papers III, 690; and Ben Tsur, Gormin Sovietiim 56–75.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Davar June 17, 1966; and Michael Elkins, “Ahmed Shukayri, Arab Dissention and the Viet Cong,” Midstream (Oct. 1966), 14–22.

    Google Scholar 

  3. The Washington Post July 25, 1966; and James Burnham, “The Kremlin Move?,” National Review (Aug. 23, 1966), 822.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Haaretz Aug. 24, 1966; and Gideon Rafael, Destination Peace (London: 1981), 130–1.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Moshe Zak, Arbaim Shnot Du-Siach im Moskva (Tel Aviv: 1988), 142–3; and The Economist Nov. 26, 1966.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Steven L. Spiegel, The Other Arab-Israeli Conflict (Chicago: 1985), 119–20; The Baltimore Sun Aug. 4, 1967; Incoming Telegram from Amembassy Jiddah, Sept. 2, 1965, NSF, Saudi Arabia, box 155, 45; “To the President from Ambassador Meyer,” July 28, 1966, From Amembassy Teheran, May 23, 1966; and Memorandum for the President, May 17, 1967, NSF, Iran, box 136, 256a, 119 and 245, LBJL.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Copyright information

© 1999 Judith A. Klinghoffer

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Klinghoffer, J.A. (1999). Washington as a One Crisis Town. In: Vietnam, Jews and the Middle East. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-27502-1_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics