Skip to main content

The Influence of Small Groups

  • Chapter
Book cover Understanding the Consumer
  • 26 Accesses

Abstract

We opened Part III: (The Social Perspective) with an examination of the effect that the family has on our consumer behaviour. Our family is, of course, our first experience of group life and forms the psychological prototype for our dealings with any other group. Its psychological importance cannot be overestimated, yet in terms of consumer behaviour its influences are probably much more general than specific. If we are interested in the specific consumer choices of adults we also need to consider the influences of all the other groups that we come into contact with, and that is the subject of the present chapter.

I wouldn’t belong to any group that would have me as a member (Groucho Marx).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Further Reading

  • Aronson, E., The Social Animal, 6th edn (New York: Freeman, 1992). The best and most readable introduction to the study of small groups and their implications for society.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clausen, J. (ed.), Socialization and Society (Boston: Little, Brown, 1968). A good overview of the way individuals are linked to their society via small group membership.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, E. M., Diffusion of Innovations, 3rd edn (New York: Free Press, 1983). Includes an account of the way group life influences the diffusion of innovations. Rogers is one of the leading researchers in this field.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robertson, T. and H. Kassarjian (eds), Handbook of Consumer Behavior (Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1991). The authoritative guide to theories and concepts in consumer behaviour. This edition contains some useful articles on the influence of group life.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swap, W. C. and Associates (eds), Group Decision Making (Beverly Hills, CA: Sage, 1984). A detailed and technical overview of the way groups arrive at decisions in a wide variety of situations.

    Google Scholar 

References

  1. Cockburn, C., ‘The gendering of jobs: workplace relations and the reproduction of sex segregation’, in S. Walby (ed.), Gender Segregation At Work (Milton Keynes and Philadelphia: Open University Press, 1988).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Maccoby, E. C. and C. N. Jacklin, ‘Sex differences in aggression: A rejoinder and reprise’, Child Development, vol. 51 (1980), pp. 964–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Huston, A. G, ‘Sex-typing’, in P. H. Mussen (ed.), Handbook of Child Development, 4th edn. (New York: Wiley, 1983).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bossard, J. H. S., ‘Residential propinquity as a factor in mate selection’, American Journal of Sociology, vol. 38 (1932), pp. 219–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Festinger, L., S. Schachter and K. Back, Social Pressures in Informal Groups (New York: Harper & Bros, 1950).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Sundstrom, E., Work Places (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1986).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Reingen, P. H. and J. B. Kennan, ‘Analysis of referral networks in marketing: Methods and illustration’, Journal of Marketing Research, vol. 23 (November 1986), pp. 370–8;

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. J. J. Brown and P. H. Reingen, ‘Social ties and word-of-mouth referral behavior’, Journal of Consumer Research, vol. 14, (December 1987), pp. 350–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Voss, P. ‘Status shifts to peer influence’, Advertising Age (17 May 1984) M-10.

    Google Scholar 

  10. If you want to follow this up see my book Psychology and the World of Work, Chapter 15 (London and New York: Macmillan and New York University Press, 1994).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Feick, L. F. and L. L. Price., ‘The market maven: A diffuser of marketplace information’, Journal of Marketing;, vol. 51 (January 1987), pp. 85–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Price, L. L. and L. F. Feick, ‘The role of interpersonal sources and external search: An informational perspective’, in T C Kinnear (ed.), Advances in Consumer Research, vol. 11 (Provo, Utah: Association for Consumer Research, 1984).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Asch, S. E., ‘Studies of independence and conformity: A minority of one against a unanimous majority’, Psychological Monographs, vol. 70, no.9 (1956) whole issue, p. 416.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Crutchfield, R. S., ‘Conformity and character’, American Psychologist, vol. 10 (1955), pp. 191–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Milgram, S., ‘Behavioral study of obedience’, Journal of Applied Psychology, vol. 67 (1963), pp. 371–8;

    Google Scholar 

  16. S. Milgram, Obedience to Authority (New York and London: Harper & Row/Tavistock, 1974).

    Google Scholar 

  17. French, J. R. P. and B. H. Raven, ‘The bases of social power’, in D. Cartwright and A. Zander (eds), Group Dynamics, 3rd edn (New York: Harper & Row, 1968).

    Google Scholar 

  18. See for example S. B. MacKenzie and J. L. Zaichkowsky, ‘An analysis of alcohol advertising using French and Raven’s theory of social influence’, in K. B. Monroe (ed.), Advances in Consumer Research, vol. 8 (Ann Arbor, MI: Association for Consumer Research, 1981), pp. 708–12.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Asch, ‘Studies’, op. cit.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Crutchfield, ‘Conformity’, op. cit.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Venkatesan, M., ‘Experimental study of consumer behavior, conformity and independence’, Journal of Marketing Research, vol. 3 (November 1966). pp. 384–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Midgley, D. F., G. R. Dowling and P. D. Morrison, ‘Consumer types, social influence, information search and choice’, in T. K. Srull (ed.), Advances in Consumer Research, vol. 16, (Provo, Utah: Association for Consumer Research, 1989), pp. 137—43.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Milgram, ‘Behavioral study’, op. cit.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Haire. M., ‘Projective techniques in marketing research’, Journal of Marketing, vol. 14 (April 1950), pp. 649–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Wehster, F. E. and F. Von Pechmann, ‘A replication of the “Shopping List” study’, Journal of Marketing, vol. 34 (April 1970), pp. 61–3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Bearden, W. O. and M.J. Etzel, ‘Reference group influence on product and brand purchase decisions’, Journal of Consumer Research, vol. 9 (September 1982), pp. 183–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Park, C. W. and V. P. Lessig, ‘Students and Housewives: Differences in susceptibility to reference group influence’, Journal of Consumer Research, vol. 4 (September 1977), pp. 102–110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Reingen and Kennan, ‘Analysis’, op. cit.; Brown and Reingen, ‘Social ties’, op. cit.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Copyright information

© 1997 David A. Statt

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Statt, D.A. (1997). The Influence of Small Groups. In: Understanding the Consumer. Palgrave, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-25438-5_10

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics