Skip to main content

Legal Services

  • Chapter
Why the Poor Pay More
  • 10 Accesses

Abstract

Unlike the goods and services considered so far in this book, legal services for poor people are often provided free or for a nominal sum So simply comparing what people pay with the services they get would almost inevitably lead to the conclusion that poor people get greater ‘value for money’ from the legal system than the better-off Legal services can however be regarded as services which ought to be equally available (and of equal standard) to all members of society. In this view consumer detriment arises out of the general inability of poorer people, despite help with costs, to get services as good as those gained by the better-off. The reasons why poorer consumers are at a disadvantage when going to law are discussed in this chapter, following a summary of the legal aid and advice schemes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 19.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Supply Estimates 1976 – 77. HC 276, London, HMSO, 1976, Class IX

    Google Scholar 

  2. House of Commons Hansard. Vol 459, 15 December 1948, col 1221

    Google Scholar 

  3. Legal Aid, 26th Annual Report 1975 – 76. London, HMSO, 1976, Appendix 21

    Google Scholar 

  4. Legal Aid, 23rd Annual Report 1972 – 73. London, HMSO, 1974, p 36

    Google Scholar 

  5. C Glasser, ‘Simplifying the financial side of legal aid’, LAG Bulletin. Legal Action Group, March 1976, p 56

    Google Scholar 

  6. Legal Aid, 26th Annual Report 1975 – 76. London, HMSO, 1976

    Google Scholar 

  7. K Foster, ‘The location of solicitors’, Modern Law Review. Vol 36, 1973

    Google Scholar 

  8. L Bridges, B Sufrin, J Whetton and R White, Legal services in Birmingham. Birmingham University, 1975

    Google Scholar 

  9. B Abel-Smith, M Zander and R Brooke, Legal problems and the citizen. London, Heinemann, 1973

    Google Scholar 

  10. Society of Labour Lawyers, Justice for all. Fabian research pamphlet no. 273, London, Fabian Society, 1968

    Google Scholar 

  11. Legal Aid, 26th Annual Report 1975 – 76. London, HMSO, 1976

    Google Scholar 

  12. Report of the Poor Persons’ Rules Committee. Cmd 2358, London, HMSO, 1925

    Google Scholar 

  13. ‘larger units are in themselves more profitable because they are more economical’. Prices and Incomes Board, Remuneration of solicitors. Cmnd 3529, London, HMSO, 1968

    Google Scholar 

  14. C M Campbell and R J Wilson, Public attitudes to the legal profession in Scotland. Undated summary of unpublished report

    Google Scholar 

  15. M Zander, ‘Who goes to solicitors?’ Law Society’s Gazette. 19 March 1969

    Google Scholar 

  16. M Zander, ‘Unrepresented defendants in magistrates’ courts’, New Law Journal 1972, p 1042

    Google Scholar 

  17. There are three such studies: K Bell, ‘National Insurance Local Tribunals’, Journal of Social Policy. No. 4, 1973, p 16; K Bell, Research study on Supplementary Benefit Appeal Tribunals. London, HMSO, 1975, p 15; and figures reported in House of Commons Hansard. Vol 855, 1 May 1973, cols 264–5

    Google Scholar 

  18. R White, ‘The distasteful character of litigation for poor persons’, The Juridicial Review. 1975, p 246

    Google Scholar 

  19. The establishment of law centres was urged especially by the Society of Labour Lawyers in the Fabian pamphlet, Justice for all, in 1968

    Google Scholar 

  20. See M Zander and P Russell, ‘Law centres survey’, Law Society’s Gazette. 10 March 1976

    Google Scholar 

  21. Brent Law Centre, First Report. January 1975

    Google Scholar 

  22. Law Society, Evidence to the Royal Commission on Legal Services. Memorandum no. 3, 1977, para XX.1, p 204

    Google Scholar 

  23. This section is based on information provided in the evidence to the Royal Commission submitted by the Greater London Citizens Advice Bureaux Lawyers’ Group.

    Google Scholar 

  24. See M Partington, Recent developments in legal services for the poor: some reflections on experience in Coventry. Occasional paper no. 12, London, CDP, undated

    Google Scholar 

  25. Financing public interest law in America. Washington DC, Council for Public Interest Law, 1976

    Google Scholar 

  26. Community Development Project, Limits of the law. London, CDP, 1977

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 1977 National Consumer Council

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Zander, M. (1977). Legal Services. In: Williams, F. (eds) Why the Poor Pay More. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-15779-2_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics