Abstract
The atmosphere of 1660–61 had been fertile for panegyric, but once its initial outburst in those years was over public poetry of praise dwindled. Poets had to find less obvious objects for their rhetoric of restoration: so Dryden addressed the New Year 1662, while Waller wrote about urban improvements and Cowley about the Royal Society. After its narrow political service in 1660–61, the idea of restoration was beginning to establish an independent status as a general literary theme. Then after the middle of the decade the second Dutch War once more caused the restoration theme to be applied to explicitly Stuart issues. The war marked a new phase of political unrest as well as providing a fresh topic of controversy and launching a new wave of public poetry. The central arguments of the mid-century, about the nature of power, authority and government in England, were revived, transmuted now into debate about the management of the war. Parliament was able to call the king’s ministers to account for their conduct, thus achieving a temporary supremacy over the monarch and severely curtailing the royal prerogative.1 Clarendon was dismissed and exiled and this meant, effectively, the defeat of the Chancellor’s out-moded vision of a balanced government mediated by privy council.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
Clayton Roberts, The Growth of Responsible Government in Stuart England (Cambridge, 1966), pp. 151–83.
P. Eraser, The Intelligence of the Secretaries of State and Their Monopoly of Licensed News 1660–1688 (Cambridge, 1956),pp. 78–85
J.R.Jones, Britain and Europe in the Seventeenth Century (1966), pp. 56–8, 60
K.H.D. Haley, The First Earl of Shaftesbury (Oxford, 1968), pp. 171–201, 266–8
Graham Greene, Lord Rochester’s Monkey (1974), pp. 47–54
Abraham Cowley, Poemata Latina (1668), pp. 313–64.
Poems, ed. J. Hunt (1870), p. 61. Cf. Iter Boreale, line 363.
Mary Tom Osborne, Advice-to-a-Painter Poems 1633–1856 (University of Texas, 1949), pp. 14–17.
Some details of the Second Advice’s answering burlesque of Waller’s Instructions are given by Warren L. Chernaik, The Poetry of Limitation: A Study of Edmund Waller (New Haven and London, 1968), pp. 186–92.
John Locke, Two Treatises of Government, ed. P. Laslett (Cambridge, 1967), p. 433.
James Kinsley, ‘The “Three Glorious Victories” in Annus Mirabilis’, RES, n.s., VII (1956), 30–7.
Dryden used the apparently unobjectionable notion of moderation in a parallel situation later: Charles E. Ward, The Life of John Dryden (Chapel Hill, 1961), pp. 123–6.
Bruce A. Rosenberg has discussed the poem’s alchemical language: ‘Annus Mirabilis Distilled’, PMLA, LXXIX (1964), 254–8.
Other painterly elements in the poem are discussed by Michael Gearin-Tosh, ‘The Structure of Marvell’s “Last Instructions to a Painter”’, Essays in Criticism, 22(1972), 48–57.
For example, Pierre Legouis, Andrew Marvell: Poet, Puritan, Patriot (second edition, Oxford, 1968), pp. 163–92
Ruth Nevo, The Dial of Virtue: A Study of Poems on Affairs of State in the Seventeenth Century (Princeton, 1963), pp. 173–9.
The balance is redressed by John M. Wallace, who covers the poem’s background and emphasises, rather exclusively, the poem’s hopeful endorsement of loyalism in the interests of an anti-French foreign policy: Destiny His Choice: The Loyalism of Andrew Marvell (Cambridge, 1968), pp. 145–83
see also David Farley-Hills, The Benevolence of Laughter: Comic Poetry of the Commonwealth and Restoration (1974), pp. 72–98.
More sympathetic is Elsie Duncan-Jones, ‘A Great Master of Words: Some Aspects of Marvell’s Poems of Praise and Blame’ (Proceedings of the British Academy, 1975).
In her brilliant ‘The Shooting of the Bears: Poetry and Politics in Andrew Marvell’, Andrew Marvell, Essays on the Tercentenary of his Death, ed. R.L. Brett (Oxford, 1979), pp. 62–103, Barbara Everett appreciates Marvell’s reluctance (or incapacity) to ‘subsume the minutiae of [his] time into a largely unjust but vital artistic harmony’.
The idea of true and false sovereignty in the poem is dealt with by Joseph H. Summers, ‘Andrew Marvell: Private Taste and Public Judgement’, Stratford-upon-Avon Studies, 11 (1970), 181–209.
Copyright information
© 1984 Nicholas Jose
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Jose, N. (1984). The Poetry of the Second Dutch War. In: Ideas of the Restoration in English Literature, 1660–71. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-06635-3_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-06635-3_6
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-06637-7
Online ISBN: 978-1-349-06635-3
eBook Packages: Palgrave Literature & Performing Arts CollectionLiterature, Cultural and Media Studies (R0)