Abstract
Elastic properties of the cell wall play a key role in regulating plant growth and morphogenesis; however, measuring them in vivo remains a challenge. Although several new methods have recently become available, they all have substantial drawbacks. Here we describe a detailed protocol for osmotic treatments, which is based on the idea of releasing the turgor pressure within the cell and measuring the resulting deformation. When placed in hyperosmotic solution, cells lose water via osmosis and shrink. Confocal images of the tissue, taken before and after this treatment, are quantified using high-resolution surface projections in MorphoGraphX. The cell shrinkage observed can then be used to estimate cell wall elasticity. This allows qualitative comparisons of cell wall properties within organs or between genotypes and can be combined with mechanical simulations to give quantitative estimates of the cells’ Young’s moduli. We use the abaxial sepal of Arabidopsis thaliana as an easily accessible model system to present our approach, but it can potentially be used on many other plant organs. The main challenges of this technique are choosing the optimal concentration of the hyperosmotic solution and producing high-quality confocal images (with cell walls visualized) good enough for segmentation in MorphoGraphX.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Forouzesh E, Goel A, Mackenzie SA, Turner JA (2013) In vivo extraction of Arabidopsis cell turgor pressure using nanoindentation in conjunction with finite element modeling. Plant J 73:509–520
Beauzamy L, Derr J, Boudaoud A (2015) Quantifying hydrostatic pressure in plant cells by using indentation with an Atomic Force Microscope. Biophys J 108:2448–2456
Milani P, Gholamirad M, Traas J, Arnéodo A, Boudaoud A, Argoul F et al (2011) In vivo analysis of local wall stiffness at the shoot apical meristem in Arabidopsis using Atomic Force Microscopy. Plant J 67:1116–1123
Kierzkowski D, Nakayama N, Routier-Kierzkowska A-L, Weber A, Bayer E, Schorderet M et al (2012) Elastic domains regulate growth and organogenesis in the plant shoot apical meristem. Science 335:1096–1109
Cosgrove DJ (2005) Growth of the plant cell wall. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 6:850–861
Hong L, Dumond M, Tsugawa S, Sapala A, Routier-Kierzkowska A-L, Zhou Y et al (2016) Variable cell growth yields reproducible organ development through spatiotemporal averaging. Dev Cell 38:15–32
Elsayad K, Werner S, Gallemà M, Kong J, Guajardo ERS, Zhang L et al (2016) Mapping the subcellular mechanical properties of live cells in tissues with fluorescence emission—Brillouin imaging. Sci Signal 9:1–13
Peaucelle A, Braybrook SA, LeGuillou L, Bron E, Kuhlemeier C, Höfte H (2011) Pectin-induced changes in cell wall mechanics underlie organ initiation in Arabidopsis. Curr Biol 21:1720–1726
Sampathkumar A, Krupinski P, Wightman R, Milani P, Berquand A, Boudaoud A et al (2014) Subcellular and supracellular mechanical stress prescribes cytoskeleton behavior in Arabidopsis cotyledon pavement cells. elife 3:e01967. https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.01967
Beauzamy L, Louveaux M, Hamant O, Boudaoud A (2015) Mechanically, the shoot apical meristem of Arabidopsis behaves like a shell inflated by a pressure of about 1 MPa. Front Plant Sci 6:1–10
Majda M, Grones P, Sintorn IM, Vain T, Milani P, Krupinski P, Zagorska-Marek B, Viotti C, Jonsson H, Mellerowicz E, Hamant O, Robert S (2017) Mechanochemical polarization of contiguous cell walls shapes plant pavement cells. Dev Cell 43:290–304
Routier-Kierzkowska A-L, Weber A, Kochova P, Felekis D, Nelson BJ, Kuhlemeier C et al (2012) Cellular force microscopy for in vivo measurements of plant tissue mechanics. Plant Physiol 158:1514–1522
Hayot CM, Forouzesh E, Goel A, Avramova Z, Turner J (2012) Viscoelastic properties of cell walls of single living plant cells determined by dynamic nanoindentation. J Exp Bot 63:2525–2540
Bolduc J-E, Lewis LJ, Aubin C-E, Geitmann A (2006) Finite-element analysis of geometrical factors in micro-indentation of pollen tubes. Biomech Model Mechanobiol 5:227–236
Wang L, Hukin D, Pritchard J, Thomas C (2006) Comparison of plant cell turgor pressure measurement by pressure probe and micromanipulation. Biotechnol Lett 28:1147–1150
Park YB, Cosgrove DJ (2012) A revised architecture of primary cell walls based on biomechanical changes induced by substrate-specific endoglucanases. Plant Physiol 158:1933–1943
Mosaliganti KR, Noche RR, Xiong F, Swinburne I, Megason SG (2012) ACME: Automated Cell Morphology Extractor for comprehensive reconstruction of cell membranes. PLoS Comput Biol 8(12):e1002780. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002780
Robinson S, Huflejt M, Barbier de Reuille P, Braybrook S, Schorderet M, Reinhardt D et al (2017) An automated confocal micro-extensometer enables in vivo quantification of mechanical properties with cellular resolution. Plant Cell 29:2959–2973
Bringmann M, Bergmann DC (2017) Tissue-wide mechanical forces influence the polarity of stomatal stem cells in Arabidopsis. Curr Biol 27:877–883
Weber A, Braybrook S, Huflejt M, Mosca G, Routier-Kierzkowska AL, Smith RS (2015) Measuring the mechanical properties of plant cells by combining micro-indentation with osmotic treatments. J Exp Bot 66:3229–3241
Barbier de Reuille P, Routier-Kierzkowska A-L, Kierzkowski D, Bassel GW, SchĂĽpbach T, Tauriello G et al (2015) MorphoGraphX: a platform for quantifying morphogenesis in 4D. elife 4:05864. https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.05864
Oparka KJ (1994) Plasmolysis: new insights into an old process. New Phytol 67:571–591
Mosca G, Sapala A, Strauss S, Routier-Kierzkowska AL, Smith RS (2017) On the micro-indentation of plant cells in a tissue context. Phys Biol 14:015003. https://doi.org/10.1088/1478-3975/aa5698
Roeder AHK, Chickarmane V, Cunha A, Obara B, Manjunath BS, Meyerowitz EM (2010) Variability in the control of cell division underlies sepal epidermal patterning in Arabidopsis thaliana. PLoS Biol 8:e1000367. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1000367
Hervieux N, Dumond M, Sapala A, Routier-Kierzkowska AL, Kierzkowski D, Roeder AHK et al (2016) A mechanical feedback restricts sepal growth and shape in Arabidopsis. Curr Biol 26:1019–1028
Smyth DR, Bowman JL, Meyerowitz EM (1990) Early flower development in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 2:755–767
Acknowledgment
We thank Daniel Kierzkowski for guidance in tissue dissection and Gabriella Mosca and Mingyuan Zhou for comments on the manuscript.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature
About this protocol
Cite this protocol
Sapala, A., Smith, R.S. (2020). Osmotic Treatment for Quantifying Cell Wall Elasticity in the Sepal of Arabidopsis thaliana. In: Naseem, M., Dandekar, T. (eds) Plant Stem Cells. Methods in Molecular Biology, vol 2094. Humana, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-0716-0183-9_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-0716-0183-9_11
Published:
Publisher Name: Humana, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-0716-0182-2
Online ISBN: 978-1-0716-0183-9
eBook Packages: Springer Protocols