Abstract
This chapter, which was solicited as a commentary upon the chapters of the computer science perspectives on scripting in the present volume, analyzes different roles that computational scripts are expected to play in collaborative learning. Three roles of computational scripts are identified and discussed: offloading some of the work of managing a collaborative interaction so that learners can focus on the learning task, guiding learners into types of interactions that are expected to be productive for learning, and communicating instructional designs. Several problems for further research are identified, including exploration of the synergy between scripting and representational aids, and investigation of the conditions under which spontaneity of patterns of behavior is a factor in the association of these patterns of behavior with learning. Given issues of learner control and the situated nature of learning, a synthesis of the roles of scripting is suggested that views a script as a proxy by which an instructional expert can participate, along with learners who draw upon the script as a resource, in the accomplishment of a successful collaborative learning episode.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Andriessen, J., Baker, M., & Suthers, D. (Eds.) (2003). Arguing to learn: Confronting Cognitions in Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning Environments. Kluwer book series on Computer Supported Collaborative Learning, Pierre Dillenbourg (Series Editor). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Baker, M., & K. Lund (1997). Promoting reflective interactions in a CSCL environment. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 13, 175–193.
Carell, A., Herrmann, T., Kienle, A., & Mcnold, N. (2005). Improving the coordination of collaborative learning with process models. In T. Koschmann, D. Suthers, & T.-W. Chan (Eds.), Computer Supported Collaborative Learning 2005: The Next 10 Years! (pp. 18–27). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Clark, H. H., & Brennan, S. E. (1991). Grounding in communication. In L. B. Resnick, J. M. Levine, & S. D. Teasley (Eds.), Perspectives on Socially Shared Cognition. (pp. 127–149). Hyattsville, MD: American Psychological Association.
Constantino-Gonzales, M. A., Suthers, D., & Escamilla, J. (2003). Coaching web-based collaborative learning based on problem solution differences and participation. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education 13(2–4), 263–299.
Dillenbourg, P. (2002). Over-scripting CSCL: The risks of blending collaborative learning with instructional design. In P. A. Kirschner (Ed.), Three worlds of CSCL. Can we support CSCL. (pp. 61–91). Heerlen: Open Universiteit Nederland.
Flores, F., Graves, M., Hartfield, B., & Winograd, T. (1988) Computer systems and the design of organizational interaction. ACM Transactions on Office Information Systems, 6(2), 153–172.
Hollan, J., & Stornetta, S., (1992). Beyond being there. In Proceedings of CHI’92 (pp. 119–125). ACM Press.
Ikeda, M., Go, S., & Mizoguchi, R. (1997). Opportunistic group formation — a theory for intelligent support in collaborative learning. In Proceedings of AIED-97 (pp. 167–174). Kobe, Japan.
Jermann, P., & Dillenbourg, P. (2003). Elaborating new arguments through a CSCL script. In J. Andriessen, M. Baker, & D. Suthers (Eds.), Arguing to learn: Confronting Cognitions in Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning Environments. Kluwer book series on Computer Supported Collaborative Learning, Pierre Dillenbourg (Series Editor). (pp. 205–226). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Koschmann, T., Zemel, A., Conlee-Stevens, M Young, N., Robbs, J., & Barnhart, A. (2005). How do people learn? In R. Bromme, F. Hesse, & H. Spada (Eds.), Barriers and Biases in Computer-mediated Knowledge Communication (and how they may be overcome) (pp. 265–294). Amsterdam: Kluwer Academic Press.
Murray, T. (1999). Authoring intelligent tutoring systems: Analysis of the state of the art. International. Journal of Artificial Intelligence and Education, 10(1), 98–129.
Robertson, J., Good, J., & Pain, H. (1998). BetterBlether: The design and evaluation of discussion tool for education. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 9, 219–236.
Slavin, R. E. (1995). Cooperative Learning: Theory, Research and Practice. (2nd ed.) Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
Stahl, G. (2006). Group Cognition: Computer Support for Collaborative Knowledge Building. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Steiner, I. D. (1972). Group Process and Productivity. New York: Academic Press.
Suthers, D. (2001). Collaborative representations: Supporting face-to-face and online knowledge-building discourse. Proceedings of the 34th Hawai’i International Conference on the System Sciences (HICSS-34)[CD-ROM]. Maui, Hawai’i: Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc. (IEEE).
Suthers, D. (2005). Technology affordances for intersubjective learning: A thematic agenda for CSCL. In T. Koschmann, D. Suthers, & T.-W. Chan (Eds.), Computer Supported Collaborative Learning 2005: The Next 10 Years! (pp. 662–671). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Suthers, D. (2006). Technology affordances for intersubjective meaning-making: A research agenda for CSCL. International Journal of Computers Supported Collaborative Learning, 1(3).
Sweller, J., van Merrienboer, J. J. G., & Paas, F. G. W. C. (1998). Cognitive architecture and instructional design. Educational Psychology Review, 10(3), 251–296.
Toth, E., Suthers, D., & Lesgold, A, (2002). Mapping to know: The effects of evidence maps and reflective assessment on scientific inquiry skills. Science Education, 86(2), 264–286.
Van Bruggen, J., Kirschner, P., & Jochems, W. (2002). External representation of argumentation in CSCL and the management of cognitive load. Learning and Instruction, 12(1), 121–138.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978), Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Weinberger, A., Reiserer, M., Ertl, B., Fischer, F., & Mandl, H. (2005). Facilitating computer-supported collaborative learning with cooperation scripts. In R. Bromme, F. W. Hesse, & H. Spada (Eds.), Barriers and Biases in Computer-mediated Knowledge Communication (and how they may be overcome) (pp. 15–37). New York: Springer.
Whitworth, B., Gallupe, B., McQueen, R, (2000). A cognitive three-process model of computer-mediated group interaction. Group Decision and Negotiation, 9, 431–456.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2007 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Suthers, D.D. (2007). Discussion. In: Fischer, F., Kollar, I., Mandl, H., Haake, J.M. (eds) Scripting Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning. Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, vol 6. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-36949-5_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-36949-5_11
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-0-387-36947-1
Online ISBN: 978-0-387-36949-5
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawEducation (R0)