Skip to main content

Efficient Update Strategies for Geometric Computing with Uncertainty

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Algorithms and Complexity (CIAC 2003)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 2653))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 454 Accesses

Abstract

We consider the problems of computing maximal points and the convex hull of a set of points in 2D, when the points are “in motion.” We assume that the point locations (or trajectories) are not known precisely and determining these values exactly is feasible, but expensive. In our model, the algorithm only knows areas within which each of the input points lie, and is required to identify the maximal points or points on the convex hull correctly by updating some points (i.e. determining exactly their location). We compare the number of points updated by the algorithm on a given instance to the minimum number of points that must be updated by an omniscient adversary in order to provably compute the answer correctly. We give algorithms for both of the above problems that always update at most 3 times as many points as the adversary, and show that this is the best possible. Our model is similar to that of [5,2].

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. A. Borodin and R. El-Yaniv, “Online Computation and Competitive Analysis”, Cambridge University Press, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  2. T. Feder, R. Motwani, R. Panigrahy, C. Olston, and J. Widom, “Computing the Median with Uncertainty”, Proc 32nd ACM STOC, 602–607, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  3. T. Feder, R. Motwani, L. O’Callaghan, C. Olston and R. Panigrahy, “Computing Shortest Paths with Uncertainty”, Proc 20th STAC, LNCS 2607, 355–366.

    Google Scholar 

  4. J. Basch, L. Guibas and J. Hershberger, “Data Structures for Mobile Data”, Proc 8th ACM-SIAM SODA.

    Google Scholar 

  5. S. Kahan, “A Model for Data in Motion”, STOC 91, 267–277.

    Google Scholar 

  6. S. Khanna and W.-C. Tan, “On Computing Functions with Uncertainty”, Proc 20th ACM PODS, 171–182.

    Google Scholar 

  7. C. Olston and J. Widom, “Offering a Precision-Performance Tradeoff for Aggregation Queries over Replicated Data”, Proc 26th VLDB, Morgan Kempmann, 144–155.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2003 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Bruce, R., Hoffmann, M., Krizanc, D., Raman, R. (2003). Efficient Update Strategies for Geometric Computing with Uncertainty. In: Petreschi, R., Persiano, G., Silvestri, R. (eds) Algorithms and Complexity. CIAC 2003. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 2653. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-44849-7_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-44849-7_9

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-40176-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-44849-5

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics