Skip to main content

Customized Corneal Treatments for Refractive Errors

  • Chapter
Cataract and Refractive Surgery

Part of the book series: Essentials in Ophthalmology ((ESSENTIALS))

  • 1084 Accesses

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Aizawa D, et al. Clinical outcomes of wavefront-guided laser in situ keratomileusis: 6-month follow-up. J Cataract Refract Surg 2003;29(8):1507–1513.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Ambrosio RJ, Wilsom S. LASIK vs. LASEK vs. PRK; advantages and indications. Semin Ophthalmol 2003;29:661–668.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Awwad ST, et al. Wavefront-guided laser in situ keratomileusis with the Alcon CustomCornea and the VISX CustomVue: three-month results. J Refract Surg 2004;20(5):S606–S613.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Battat L, et al. Effects of laser in situ keratomileusis on tear production, clearance, and the ocular surface. Ophthalmology 2001;108(7):1230–1235.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Cano D, Barbero S, Marcos S. Comparison of real and computer-simulated outcomes of LASIK refractive surgery. J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis 2004;21(6):926–936.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Cantu R, et al. Objective quality of vision in presbyopic and non-presbyopic patients after pseudoaccommodative advanced surface ablation. J Refract Surg 2005;21(5 Suppl):S603–S605.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Chayet A, Bains H. Clinical results with the Nidek NAVEX platform. In: Krueger R, MacRae S, Applegate R, eds. Wavefront Customized Visual Correction: The Quest for Super Vision II. Thorofare, NJ: SLACK, 2004;265–270.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Cobo-Soriano R, et al. Thin flap laser in situ keratomileusis: analysis of contrast sensitivity, visual, and refractive outcomes. J Cataract Refract Surg 2005;31(7):1357–1365.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. DePaolis M, Aquavella J. Refractive surgery update: how to respond to common questions. Contact Lens Spectrum 1993;8(12):36.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Dupps WJ Jr, Roberts C. Effect of acute biomechanical changes on corneal curvature after photokeratectomy. J Refract Surg 2001;17(6):658–669.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Durrie DS, Stahl JE, Schwendeman F. Alcon LADARWave CustomCornea Retreatments. J Refract Surg 2005;21:S804–S807.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. El Danasoury M, et al. Comparison of photorefractive keratectomy with excimer laser in situ keratomileusis in correcting low myopia (from −2.00 to −5.00 diopters). A randomized study. Ophthalmology 1999;106:411–420.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Febbraro JL, Buzard KA, Friedlander MH. Reoperations after myopic laser in situ keratomileusis. J Cataract Refract Surg 2000;26(1):41–48.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Gimbel HV, et al. Wavefront-guided multipoint (segmental) custom ablation enhancement using the Nidek NAVEX platform. J Refract Surg 2003;19(2 Suppl):S209–S216.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Guirao A, Cox IG, Willliams DR. Method for optimizing the correction of the eye’s higherorder aberrations in the presence of decentrations. J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis 2002;19(1):126–128.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Guirao A, Williams DR, MacRae SM. Effect of beam size on the expected benefit of customized laser refractive surgery. J Refract Surg 2003;19(1):15–23.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Hersh PS, Fry KL, Bishop DS. Incidence and associations of retreatment after LASIK. Ophthalmology 2003;110(4):748–754.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Huang D. Physics of customized corneal ablation. In: Krueger R, Applegate R, MacRae S, eds. Wavefront Customized Visual Correction: Quest for Super Vision II. Thorofare, NJ: SLACK, 2004;171–180.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Huang D, Arif M. Spot size and quality of scanning laser correction of higher-order wavefront aberrations. J Cataract Refract Surg 2002;28(3):407–416.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Huang D, Tang M, Shekhar R. Mathematical model of corneal surface smoothing after laser refractive surgery. Am J Ophthalmol 2003;135(3):267–278.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Kastube N, et al. Biomechanical response of the cornea to phototherapeutic keratectomy when treated as a fluid-filled porous material. J Refract Surg 2002;18(5):S593–S597.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Kohnen T, et al. Ten-year follow-up of a ciliary sulcus-fixated silicone phakic posterior chamber intraocular lens. J Cataract Refract Surg 2004;30:2431–2434.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Krueger RR. Technology requirements for customized corneal ablation. In: MacRae S, Krueger SS, Applegate RA, eds. Thorofare, NJ: SLACK, 2001;133–147.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Krueger RR, Applegate RA, MacRae S. Wavefront Customized Visual Correction: The Quest for Super Vision II. Thorofare, NJ: SLACK, 2004;127–161.

    Google Scholar 

  25. L’Esperance FJ, et al. Human excimer laser keratectomcorneal surgery: preliminary report (presented at American Ophthalmological Society Meeting, Hot Springer, Ark). Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc 1988;86:208–275.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Liang J, et al. Objective measurement of wave aberrations of the human eye with the use of a Hartmann-Shack wave-front sensor. J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis 1994;11(7):1949–1957.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Liang J, Williams DR, Miller DT. Supernormal vision and high-resolution retinal imaging through adaptive optics. J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis 1997;14(11):2884–2892.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Liang J, Koch D. Customized ablation using the VISX WaveScan system and the VISX S4 Active-Trak Excimer Laser. In: Krueger R, Applegate R, MacRae S, eds. Wavefront Customized Visual Correction: Quest for Super Vision II. Thorofare, NJ: SLACK, 2001;227–233.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Machat J, Slade S, Probst L. The Art of Lasik, 2nd edn. Thorofare, NJ: SLACK, 1998;50–53.

    Google Scholar 

  30. MacRae S. Excimer ablation design and elliptical transition zones. J Cataract Refract Surg 1999;25:1191–1197.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. MacRae S, Cox I. Comparison of customized LASEK to conventional LASIK using the Bausch and Lomb 217z Technolaz Laser (abstract). Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  32. MacRae S, Krueger RR, Applegate RA. Customized Corneal Ablation: The Quest for SuperVision. Thorofare, NJ: Slack, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  33. MacRae S, Applegate R, Krueger R. An introduction to wavefront-guided correction. In: Wavefront Customized Visual Correction: Quest for Super Vision II. Thorofare, NJ: SLACK, 2001;3–7.

    Google Scholar 

  34. MacRae S, et al. Customised ablation using the Bausch & Lomb Zyopitx System. In: MacRae S, Krueger R, Applegate R, eds. Thorofare, NJ: SLACK 2001;235–241.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Maldonado MJ, et al. Optical coherence tomography evaluation of the corneal cap and stromal bed features after laser in situ keratomileusis for high myopia and astigmatism. Ophthalmology 2000;107(1):81–87; discussion 88.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Mantry S, Yeung I, Shah S. Aspheric ablation with the Nidek EC-5000 CX II with OPD-Scan objective analysis. J Refract Surg 2004;20(5 Suppl):S666–S668.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Marcos S, Cano D, Barbero S. Increase in corneal asphericity after standard laser in situ keratomileusis for myopia is not inherent to the Munnerlyn algorithm. J Refract Surg 2003;19(5):S592–S596.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Martinez CE, et al. Effect of pupil dilation on corneal optical aberrations after photorefractive keratectomy. Arch Ophthalmol 1998;116:1053–1062.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Mrochen M, Seiler T. Influence of corneal curvature on calculation of ablation patterns used in photorefractive laser surgery. J Refract Surg 2001;17(5):S584–S587.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Mrochen M, et al. Principles of Tscherning aberrometry. J Refract Surg 2000;16(5):S570–S571.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Mrochen M, Kaemmerer M, Seiler T. Wavefrontguided laser in situ keratomileusis: early results in three eyes. J Refract Surg 2000;16(2):116–121.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Pallikaris IG, et al. Laser in situ keratomileusis. Lasers Surg Med 1990;10(5):463–468.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Pallikaris IG, et al. Photorefractive keratectomy with a small spot laser and tracker. J Refract Surg 1999;15(2):137–144.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Pallikaris IG, et al. Induced optical aberrations following formation of a laser in situ keratomileusis flap. J Cataract Refract Surg 2002;28(10):1737–1741.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Pallikaris IG, et al. Epi-LASIK: preliminary clinical results of an alternative surface ablation procedure. J Cataract Refract Surg 2005;31(5):879–885.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Petit G, et al. Customized ablation using the Alcon CustomCornea Platform. In: Krueger R, Mac-Rae S, Applegate R, eds. Thorofare, NJ: SLACK, 2001;217–225.

    Google Scholar 

  47. Pineda-Fernandez A, et al. Phakic posterior chamber intraocular lens for high myopia. J Cataract Refract Surg 2004;30(11):2277–2283.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Porter J, et al. Monochromatic aberrations of the human eye in a large population. J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis 2001;18(8):1793–1803.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Porter J, et al. Separate effects of the microkeratome incision and laser ablation on the eye’s wave aberration. Am J Ophthalmol 2003;136(2):327–337.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Porter J, et al. Aberrations induced by pupil center decentrations in customized laser refractive surgery. IOVS 2004;45:ARVO E-Abstract 212.

    Google Scholar 

  51. Potgieter FJ, et al. Prediction of flap response. J Cataract Refract Surg 2005;31(1):106–114.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Rajan M, et al. A long-term study of photorefractive keratectomy: 12 year followup. Ophthalmology 2004;111:1813–1824.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Reinstein D, et al. Customized corneal ablation using the Carl Zeiss Meditec Platform: CRS-Master, WASCA, TOSCA, MEL70, and MEL80 Excimer Lasers. In: Krueger R, MacRae S, Applegate R, eds. Wavefront Customized Visual Correction: Quest for Super Vision II. Thorofare, NJ: SLACK, 2001;243–258.

    Google Scholar 

  54. Roberts C. The cornea is not a piece of plastic. J Refract Surg 2000;16(4):407–413.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  55. Roberts C. Biomechanics of the cornea and wavefron-guided laser refractive surgery. J Refract Surg 2002;18(5):S589–S592.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Roberts C, Dupps W. Corneal biomechanics and their role in corneal ablative procedures. In: Mac-Rae S, Krueger R, Applegate R, eds. Customized Corneal Ablation: The Quest for Super Vision. Thorofare, NJ: SLACK, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  57. Rodriguez P, et al. Accuracy and reproducibility of Zywave, Tracey, and experimental aberrometers. J Refract Surg 2004;20(6):810–817.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Seiler T, et al. Excimer laser keratectomy for correction of astigmatism. Am J Ophthalmol 1988;105(2):117–124.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  59. Seiler T, et al. Ocular optical aberrations after photorefractive keratectomy for myopia and myopic astigmatism. Arch Ophthalmol 2000;118:17–21.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  60. Subbaram M, et al. Role of spherical aberration on refractive outcome after custom LASIK procedure. IOVS 2005;46:E-Abstract 4362.

    Google Scholar 

  61. Subbaram M, MacRae SM. Customized LASIK treatment for myopia: the Rochester nomogram, submitted for publication.

    Google Scholar 

  62. Sutton H, Reinstein D, Holland S. Anatomy of the flap in LASIK very high frequency ultrasound scanning. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1998;39:S244.

    Google Scholar 

  63. Telandro A. Pseudo-accommodative cornea: a new concept for correction of presbyopia. J Refract Surg 2004;20(5 Suppl):S714–S717.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Tran DB, et al. Randomized prospective clinical study comparing induced aberrations with IntraLase and Hansatome flap creation in fellow eyes: potential impact on wavefront-guided laser in situ keratomileusis. J Cataract Refract Surg 2005;31(1):97–105.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. Waheed S, et al. Flap-reduced and laser-induced ocular aberrations in a two-step LASIK procedure. J Refract Surg 2005;21(4):346–352.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. Yoon G, et al. Causes of spherical aberration induced by laser refractive surgery. J Cataract Refract Surg 2005;31(1):127–135.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2006 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

MacRae, S.M., Subbaram, M.V. (2006). Customized Corneal Treatments for Refractive Errors. In: Kohnen, T., Koch, D.D. (eds) Cataract and Refractive Surgery. Essentials in Ophthalmology. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg . https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-30796-6_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-30796-6_5

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-30795-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-30796-9

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics