Abstract
The representation problem based on factoring gives rise to alternative solutions to a lot of cryptographic protocols in the literature. Fischlin applies the problem to identification and (blind) signatures. Here we show some flaw of Fischlin’s schemes and present the revision.
Supported by President’s Foundation of Graduate School of CAS (yzjj2003010).
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Bellare, M., Fischlin, M., Glodwasser, S., Micali, S.: Indentification protocols secure against reset attacks. In: Pfitzmann, B. (ed.) EUROCRYPT 2001. LNCS, vol. 2045, pp. 495–511. Springer, Heidelberg (2001)
Bellare, M., Rogaway, P.: Random oracle are practical: a paradigm for designing efficient protocols. In: First ACM conference on Computer and Communication Security, pp. 62–73. ACM Press, New York (1993)
Boneh, D., Venkatesan, R.: Breaking RSA may not be equivalent to factoring. In: Nyberg, K. (ed.) EUROCRYPT 1998. LNCS, vol. 1403, pp. 59–71. Springer, Heidelberg (1998)
Di Crescenzo, G., Katz, J., Ostrovsky, R., Smith, A.: Efficient and non-interactive non-malleable commitment. In: Pfitzmann, B. (ed.) EUROCRYPT 2001. LNCS, vol. 2045, pp. 40–59. Springer, Heidelberg (2001)
Dolev, D., Dwork, C., Noar, M.: Non-malleable cryptography. SIAM J. on Computing 30(2), 391–437 (2000)
Fiat, A., Shamir, A.: How to prove yourself: practical solutions to identification and signature schemes. In: Odlyzko, A.M. (ed.) CRYPTO 1986. LNCS, vol. 263, pp. 186–194. Springer, Heidelberg (1987)
Fischlin, M., Fischlin, R.: Efficient non-malleable commitment schemes. In: Bellare, M. (ed.) CRYPTO 2000. LNCS, vol. 1880, pp. 414–432. Springer, Heidelberg (2000)
Fischlin, M., Fischlin, R.: The representation problem based on factoring. In: Preneel, B. (ed.) CT-RSA 2002. LNCS, vol. 2271, pp. 96–113. Springer, Heidelberg (2002)
Okamoto, T.: Provable secure and practical identification schemes and corresponding signature schemes. In: Brickell, E.F. (ed.) CRYPTO 1992. LNCS, vol. 740, pp. 31–53. Springer, Heidelberg (1993)
Pointcheval, D., Stern, J.: Security arguments for digital signatures and blind signatures. J. of Cryptology 13(3), 361–396 (2000)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2005 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Lv, K. (2005). Revised Fischlin’s (Blind) Signature Schemes. In: Hao, Y., et al. Computational Intelligence and Security. CIS 2005. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 3802. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/11596981_14
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/11596981_14
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-30819-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-31598-8
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)