Abstract
Host bird species of the Eurasian Cuckoo, Cuculus canorus, often display egg-discrimination behaviour but chick-rejection behaviour has never been reported. In this paper, we analyse a host-cuckoo association in which both population dynamics and evolutionary dynamics are explored in a discrete-time model. We introduce four host types, each with their own defence behaviour, displaying either egg or chick rejection, neither or both, We also introduce fitness functions for each of these host types. Although we can characterize the long term behaviour in many cases by a simple heuristic argument which is in accordance with common views in ecology, there are a number of other phenomena that are not explained within this framework: we describe stable oscillatory behaviour and coexistence of two defensive host types. We analyse the scenarios in which chick rejection may establish itself and give a first explanation as to why this defence trait has never been recorded in nature. We find that chick rejectors generally are at an intrinsic disadvantage with respect to a host type that rejects eggs. Hosts benefit more from rejecting cuckoo eggs than cuckoo chicks, and our model suggests that this is chiefly responsible for the absence of chick rejection. Moreover, even though it seems that chick rejection must be useful as an extra defence, it is shown that hosts with both defence strategies are less likely to establish themselves in competition with egg-rejectors than hosts which reject chicks only. These results provide insight in the extent to which adaptations may be perfected by natural selection.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Arrowsmith, D. K. and C. H. Place (1990). Introduction to Dynamical Systems, Cambridge University Press.
Brooke, M. de L. and N. B. Davies (1989). Provisioning of nestling cuckoos Cuculus canorus by reed warbler Acrocephalus scirpaceus hosts. Ibis 131, 630–632.
Brooker, L. C., M. G. Brooker and A. M. H. Brooker (1990). An alternative population/genetic model for the evolution of egg mimesis, and egg crypsis in cuckoos. J. Theor. Biol. 146, 123–143.
Cramp, S. (1988). Handbook of the Birds of Europe, the Middle East and North Africa, Vol. V, New York: Oxford University Press.
Cramp, S. and D. J. Brooks (1992). Handbook of the Birds of Europe, the Middle East and North Africa, Vol. VI, New York: Oxford University Press.
Davies, N. B. (2000). Cuckoos, Cowbirds and Other Cheats, London: T. & A. D. Poyser.
Davies, N. B. and M. de L. Brooke (1988). Cuckoos versus reed warblers: adaptations and counteradaptations. Anim. Behav. 36, 262–284.
Davies, N. B. and M. de L. Brooke (1989). An experimental study of co-evolution between the cuckoo, Cuculus canorus, and its hosts. II. Host egg markings, chick discrimination and genera, discussion. J. Anim. Ecol. 58, 225–236.
Davies, N. B., R. M. Kilner and D. G. Noble (1998). Nestling cuckoos Cuculus canorus exploit hosts with begging calls that mimic a brood. Proc. R. Soc. Lond B 265, 673–678.
Dawkins, R. and J. R. Krebs (1979). Arms races between and within species. Proc. R. Soc. Lond B 205, 489–511.
Futuyma, D. J. (1979). Evolutionary Biology, Sunderland, MA: Sinauer Associates.
Gilbert, L. E. (1980). Food web organization and the conservation of neotropical diversity, in Conservation Biology, M. E. Soulé and B. A. Wilcox (Eds), Sunderland, MA: Sinauer Associates, pp. 11–33.
Kelly, C. (1987). A model to explore the rate of spread of mimicry and rejection in hypothetical populations of cuckoos and their hosts. J. Theor. Biol. 125, 283–299.
Lotem, A. (1993). Learning to recognize nestlings is maladaptive for cuckoo Cuculus canorus hosts. Nature 362, 743–745.
Marchetti, K. (1992). Costs to defence and the persistence of parasitic cuckoos. Proc. R. Soc. Lond B 248, 41–45.
May, R. M. (1973). Stability and Complexity in Model Ecosystems, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
May, R. M. and S. K. Robinson (1985). The population dynamics of avian brood parasitism. Am. Nat. 126, 475–494.
Moksnes, A., E. Røskaft and A. T. Braa (1991). Rejection behavior by common cuckoo hosts towards artificial brood parasite eggs. Auk 108, 348–354.
Nakamura, H. (1990). Brood parasitism by the cuckoo Cuculus canorus in Japan and the start of new parasitism on the azure-winged magpie Cyanopica cyana. Japan. J. Orn. 39, 1–18.
Nicholson, A. J. and V. A. Bailey (1935). The balance of animal populations, i. Proc. Zool. Soc. Lond. 1, 551–598.
Rohwer, S., C. D. Spaw and E. Røskaft (1989). Costs to northern orioles of puncture-ejecting parasitic cowbird eggs from their nests. Auk 106, 734–738.
Røskaft, E., G. H. Orians and L. D. Beletsky (1990). Why do red-winged blackbirds accept eggs of brown-headed cowbirds? Evol. Ecol. 4, 35–42.
Rothstein, I. (1975). Evolutionary rates and host defenses against avian brood parasitism. Am. Nat. 109, 161–176.
Rothstein, S. I. (1990). A model system for coevolution: avian brood parasitism. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 21, 481–508.
Rothstein, S. I. (2000). Relic behaviours, coevolution and the retention versus loss of host defences after episodes of avian brood parasitism. Anim. Behav. 61, 95–107.
Rothstein, S. I. and S. K. Robinson (1998). Major unresolved questions in the study of avian brood parasitism, in Brood-parasites and their Hosts, S. I. Rothstein and S. K. Robinson (Eds), Oxford University Press, pp. 419–425.
Soler, M., J. J. Soler, J. G. Martinez and A. P. Møller (1995). Chick recognition and acceptance: a weakness in magpies exploited by the parasitic great spotted cuckoo. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 37, 243–248.
Takasu, F. (1998). Why do all host species not show defense against avian brood parasitism: evolutionary lag or equilibrium? Am. Nat. 151, 193–205.
Takasu, F., K. Kawasaki, H. Nakamura, J. E. Cohen and N. Shigesada (1993). Modeling the population dynamics of a cuckoo-host association and the evolution of host defences. Am. Nat. 142, 819–839.
Winfree, R. (1999). Cuckoos, cowbirds and the persistence of brood parasitism. Trends Ecol. Evol. 14, 338–343.
Zahavi, A. (1979). Parasitism and nest predation. Am. Nat. 113, 157–159.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Planqué, R., Britton, N.F., Franks, N.R. et al. The adaptiveness of defence strategies against cuckoo parasitism. Bull. Math. Biol. 64, 1045–1068 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1006/bulm.2002.0311
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1006/bulm.2002.0311