Skip to main content
Log in

The adaptiveness of defence strategies against cuckoo parasitism

  • Published:
Bulletin of Mathematical Biology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Host bird species of the Eurasian Cuckoo, Cuculus canorus, often display egg-discrimination behaviour but chick-rejection behaviour has never been reported. In this paper, we analyse a host-cuckoo association in which both population dynamics and evolutionary dynamics are explored in a discrete-time model. We introduce four host types, each with their own defence behaviour, displaying either egg or chick rejection, neither or both, We also introduce fitness functions for each of these host types. Although we can characterize the long term behaviour in many cases by a simple heuristic argument which is in accordance with common views in ecology, there are a number of other phenomena that are not explained within this framework: we describe stable oscillatory behaviour and coexistence of two defensive host types. We analyse the scenarios in which chick rejection may establish itself and give a first explanation as to why this defence trait has never been recorded in nature. We find that chick rejectors generally are at an intrinsic disadvantage with respect to a host type that rejects eggs. Hosts benefit more from rejecting cuckoo eggs than cuckoo chicks, and our model suggests that this is chiefly responsible for the absence of chick rejection. Moreover, even though it seems that chick rejection must be useful as an extra defence, it is shown that hosts with both defence strategies are less likely to establish themselves in competition with egg-rejectors than hosts which reject chicks only. These results provide insight in the extent to which adaptations may be perfected by natural selection.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Arrowsmith, D. K. and C. H. Place (1990). Introduction to Dynamical Systems, Cambridge University Press.

  • Brooke, M. de L. and N. B. Davies (1989). Provisioning of nestling cuckoos Cuculus canorus by reed warbler Acrocephalus scirpaceus hosts. Ibis 131, 630–632.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brooker, L. C., M. G. Brooker and A. M. H. Brooker (1990). An alternative population/genetic model for the evolution of egg mimesis, and egg crypsis in cuckoos. J. Theor. Biol. 146, 123–143.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cramp, S. (1988). Handbook of the Birds of Europe, the Middle East and North Africa, Vol. V, New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cramp, S. and D. J. Brooks (1992). Handbook of the Birds of Europe, the Middle East and North Africa, Vol. VI, New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davies, N. B. (2000). Cuckoos, Cowbirds and Other Cheats, London: T. & A. D. Poyser.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davies, N. B. and M. de L. Brooke (1988). Cuckoos versus reed warblers: adaptations and counteradaptations. Anim. Behav. 36, 262–284.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davies, N. B. and M. de L. Brooke (1989). An experimental study of co-evolution between the cuckoo, Cuculus canorus, and its hosts. II. Host egg markings, chick discrimination and genera, discussion. J. Anim. Ecol. 58, 225–236.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davies, N. B., R. M. Kilner and D. G. Noble (1998). Nestling cuckoos Cuculus canorus exploit hosts with begging calls that mimic a brood. Proc. R. Soc. Lond B 265, 673–678.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dawkins, R. and J. R. Krebs (1979). Arms races between and within species. Proc. R. Soc. Lond B 205, 489–511.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Futuyma, D. J. (1979). Evolutionary Biology, Sunderland, MA: Sinauer Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert, L. E. (1980). Food web organization and the conservation of neotropical diversity, in Conservation Biology, M. E. Soulé and B. A. Wilcox (Eds), Sunderland, MA: Sinauer Associates, pp. 11–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelly, C. (1987). A model to explore the rate of spread of mimicry and rejection in hypothetical populations of cuckoos and their hosts. J. Theor. Biol. 125, 283–299.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lotem, A. (1993). Learning to recognize nestlings is maladaptive for cuckoo Cuculus canorus hosts. Nature 362, 743–745.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marchetti, K. (1992). Costs to defence and the persistence of parasitic cuckoos. Proc. R. Soc. Lond B 248, 41–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • May, R. M. (1973). Stability and Complexity in Model Ecosystems, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • May, R. M. and S. K. Robinson (1985). The population dynamics of avian brood parasitism. Am. Nat. 126, 475–494.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moksnes, A., E. Røskaft and A. T. Braa (1991). Rejection behavior by common cuckoo hosts towards artificial brood parasite eggs. Auk 108, 348–354.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nakamura, H. (1990). Brood parasitism by the cuckoo Cuculus canorus in Japan and the start of new parasitism on the azure-winged magpie Cyanopica cyana. Japan. J. Orn. 39, 1–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nicholson, A. J. and V. A. Bailey (1935). The balance of animal populations, i. Proc. Zool. Soc. Lond. 1, 551–598.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rohwer, S., C. D. Spaw and E. Røskaft (1989). Costs to northern orioles of puncture-ejecting parasitic cowbird eggs from their nests. Auk 106, 734–738.

    Google Scholar 

  • Røskaft, E., G. H. Orians and L. D. Beletsky (1990). Why do red-winged blackbirds accept eggs of brown-headed cowbirds? Evol. Ecol. 4, 35–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rothstein, I. (1975). Evolutionary rates and host defenses against avian brood parasitism. Am. Nat. 109, 161–176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rothstein, S. I. (1990). A model system for coevolution: avian brood parasitism. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 21, 481–508.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rothstein, S. I. (2000). Relic behaviours, coevolution and the retention versus loss of host defences after episodes of avian brood parasitism. Anim. Behav. 61, 95–107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rothstein, S. I. and S. K. Robinson (1998). Major unresolved questions in the study of avian brood parasitism, in Brood-parasites and their Hosts, S. I. Rothstein and S. K. Robinson (Eds), Oxford University Press, pp. 419–425.

  • Soler, M., J. J. Soler, J. G. Martinez and A. P. Møller (1995). Chick recognition and acceptance: a weakness in magpies exploited by the parasitic great spotted cuckoo. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 37, 243–248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Takasu, F. (1998). Why do all host species not show defense against avian brood parasitism: evolutionary lag or equilibrium? Am. Nat. 151, 193–205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Takasu, F., K. Kawasaki, H. Nakamura, J. E. Cohen and N. Shigesada (1993). Modeling the population dynamics of a cuckoo-host association and the evolution of host defences. Am. Nat. 142, 819–839.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Winfree, R. (1999). Cuckoos, cowbirds and the persistence of brood parasitism. Trends Ecol. Evol. 14, 338–343.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zahavi, A. (1979). Parasitism and nest predation. Am. Nat. 113, 157–159.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nicholas F. Britton.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Planqué, R., Britton, N.F., Franks, N.R. et al. The adaptiveness of defence strategies against cuckoo parasitism. Bull. Math. Biol. 64, 1045–1068 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1006/bulm.2002.0311

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1006/bulm.2002.0311

Keywords

Navigation