Skip to main content
Log in

Fertility assurance through extrapair fertilization, and male parental effort

  • Published:
Bulletin of Mathematical Biology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Extrapair paternity (EPP) has been observed in many formally monogamous species. Male pursuit of extrapair fertilizations (EPF) is explained by the advantages of having offspring that receive essential paternal care from other males. Because females are capable of exercising a degree of control over the post-copulatory sperm competition, EPP’s persistence indicates that females benefit from EPF. Thus, EPP involves cooperation between mated females and extrapair males. On the other hand, mated males exhibit a spectrum of anti-cuckolding strategies. Hence, extrapair attributes of diverse species and populations reported in the literature are particular solutions of evolutionary games involving gender-specific cuckolding/anti-cuckolding strategies. Here we use game theoretical methods to study the effect of male paternal effort conserving strategies in situations where females seek EPF for reasons of genetic compatibility and/or in pursuit of genetic diversity for their offspring. Our results indicate that in these circumstances pursuit of EPF is the only evolutionary stable female strategy. Males, on the other hand, have two, mutually exclusive, evolutionary stable strategies: males that restrict parental care regardless of their mate’s fidelity, and males that never restrict parental care. That is, when females seek EPF for reasons of fertility assurance and/or genetic diversity, the conditional male strategy—therein the male’s parental efforts are based on his certainty of paternity—loses in competition with the unconditional strategies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Birkhead, T. R. and A. P. Møller (1992). Sperm Competition in Birds: Evolutionary Causes and Consequences, New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Birkhead, T. R. and A. P. Møller (1993). Female control of paternity. Trend. Ecol. Evolut. 8, 100–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burke, T. (1989). DNA fingerprinting and other methods for the study of mating success. Trends Ecol. Evolut. 4, 139–144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cézilly, F. and R. G. Nager (1995). Comparative evidence for a positive association between divorce and extra-pair paternity in birds. Proc. R. Soc. London Ser. B 262, 7–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cressman, R. and A. T. Dash (1991). Strong stability and evolutionary stable strategies with two types of players. J. Math. Biol. 30, 89–99.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Currie, D. R., T. Burke, R. L. Whitney and D. B. A. Thompson (1998). Male and female behaviour and extra-pair paternity in the wheatear. Anim. Behav. 55, 689–703.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davies, N. (1991). Mating systems, in Behavioural Ecology, 3rd edn, J. R. Krebs and N. B. Davies (Eds), Blackwell Science, pp. 263–294.

  • Dixon, A., D. Ross, S. L. C. O’Malley and T. Burke (1994). Paternal investment inversely related to degree of extrapair paternity in the reed bunting. Nature 371, 698–700.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dunn, P. O., A. D. Afton, M. L. Gloutney and R. T. Alisauskas (1999). Forced copulation results in few extrapair fertilizations in Ross’s and lesser snow geese. Anim. Behav. 57, 1071–1081.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ewen, J. G. and D. P. Armstrong (2000). Male provisioning is negatively correlated with attempted extrapair copulation frequency in the stitchbird (or hihi). Anim. Behav. 60, 429–433.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jeffreys, A. J., V. Wilson and S. L. Thein (1985). Hypervariable ‘minisatellite’ regions in human DNA. Nature 314, 67–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jennions, M. D. and M. Petrie (2000). Why do females mate multiply? A review of the genetic benefits. Biol. Rev. 75, 21–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, K., E. DuVal, M. Kielt and C. Hughes (2000). Male mating strategies and the mating system of great-tailed grackles. Behav. Ecol. 11, 132–141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kempenaers, B. and B. C. Sheldon (1996). Why do male birds not discriminate between their own and extra-pair offspring? Anim. Behav. 51, 1165–1173.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kempenaers, B. and B. C. Sheldon (1997). Studying paternity and paternal care: pitfalls and problems. Anim. Behav. 53, 423–427.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kempenaers, B., G. R. Verheyren and A. A. Dhondt (1997). Extra-pair paternity in the blue tit (Parus caeruleus): female choice, male characteristics, and offspring quality. Behav. Ecol. 8, 481–492.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kempenaers, B., R. B. Lanctot and R. J. Robertson (1998). Certainty of paternity and paternal investment in eastern bluebirds and tree swallows. Anim. Behav. 55, 845–860.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kempenaers, B., B. Congdon, P. Boag and R. J. Robertson (1999). Extrapair paternity and egg hatchability in tree swallows: evidence for the genetic compatibility hypothesis? Behav. Ecol. 10, 304–311.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krokene, C., K. Rigstad, M. Dale and J. T. Lifjeld (1998). The function of extrapair paternity in blue tits and great tits: good genes or fertility insurance? Behav. Ecol. 9, 649–656.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Møller, A. P. and J. V. Briskie (1995). Extra-pair paternity, sperm competition and the evolution of testis size in birds. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 46, 357–365.

    Google Scholar 

  • Møller, A. P. (2000). Male parental care, female reproductive success, and extrapair paternity. Behav. Ecol. 11, 161–168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Møller, A. P. and J. J. Cuervo (2000). The evolution of paternity and paternal care in birds. Behav. Ecol. 11, 472–485.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peterson, K. A., K. J. Thusius, L. A. Whittingham and P. O. Dunn (2001). Allocation of male parental care in relation to paternity within and among broods of the common yellowthroat (Geothlypis trichas). Ethology 107, 573–586.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Petrie, M. and B. Kempenaers (1998). Extrapair paternity in birds: explaining variation between species and populations. Trends Ecol. Evol. 13, 52–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Selten, R. (1980). A note on evolutionarily stable strategies in asymmetrical animal conflicts. J. Theor. Biol. 84, 93–101.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Sheldon, B. C., K. Rasanen and P. C. Dias (1997). Certainty of paternity and paternal effort in the collared flycatcher. Behav. Ecol. 8, 421–428.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strohbach, S., E. Curio, A. Bathen, J. T. Epplen and T. Lubjuhn (1998). Extrapair paternity in the great tit (Parus major): a test of the “good genes” hypothesis. Behav. Ecol. 9, 388–396.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stutchbury, B. J. M. (1998). Extra-pair mating effort of male hooded warblers Wilsonia citrina. Anim. Behav. 55, 553–561.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trivers, R. L. (1972). Parental investment and sexual selection, in Sexual Selection and the Descent of Man, B. Campbell (Ed.), Aldine.

  • Wagner, R. H., M. D. Schug and E. S. Morton (1996). Confidence of paternity, actual paternity and parental effort by purple martins. Anim. Behav. 52, 123–132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weibull, J. W. (1996). Evolutionary Game Theory, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whittingham, L. A. and J. T. Lifjeld (1995). High parental investment in unrelated young—extra-pair paternity and male-parental care in house martins. Behav. Ecol. Socbiol. 37, 103–108.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yezerinac, S. M., P. J. Weatherhead and P. T. Boag (1996). Cuckoldry and lack of parentage-dependent paternal care in yellow warblers: a cost-benefit approach. Anim. Behav. 52, 821–832.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zeh, J. A. and D. W. Zeh (1996). The evolution of polyandry. 1. Intragenomic conflict and genetic incompatibility. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. Ser. B 263, 1711–1717.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zeh, J. A. and D. W. Zeh (1997). The evolution of polyandry. 2. Post copulatory defenses against genetic incompatibility. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. Ser. B 264, 69–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michael A. Fishman.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Fishman, M.A., Stone, L. Fertility assurance through extrapair fertilization, and male parental effort. Bull. Math. Biol. 64, 809–823 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1006/bulm.2002.0301

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1006/bulm.2002.0301

Keywords

Navigation