Abstract
Extrapair paternity (EPP) has been observed in many formally monogamous species. Male pursuit of extrapair fertilizations (EPF) is explained by the advantages of having offspring that receive essential paternal care from other males. Because females are capable of exercising a degree of control over the post-copulatory sperm competition, EPP’s persistence indicates that females benefit from EPF. Thus, EPP involves cooperation between mated females and extrapair males. On the other hand, mated males exhibit a spectrum of anti-cuckolding strategies. Hence, extrapair attributes of diverse species and populations reported in the literature are particular solutions of evolutionary games involving gender-specific cuckolding/anti-cuckolding strategies. Here we use game theoretical methods to study the effect of male paternal effort conserving strategies in situations where females seek EPF for reasons of genetic compatibility and/or in pursuit of genetic diversity for their offspring. Our results indicate that in these circumstances pursuit of EPF is the only evolutionary stable female strategy. Males, on the other hand, have two, mutually exclusive, evolutionary stable strategies: males that restrict parental care regardless of their mate’s fidelity, and males that never restrict parental care. That is, when females seek EPF for reasons of fertility assurance and/or genetic diversity, the conditional male strategy—therein the male’s parental efforts are based on his certainty of paternity—loses in competition with the unconditional strategies.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Birkhead, T. R. and A. P. Møller (1992). Sperm Competition in Birds: Evolutionary Causes and Consequences, New York: Academic Press.
Birkhead, T. R. and A. P. Møller (1993). Female control of paternity. Trend. Ecol. Evolut. 8, 100–104.
Burke, T. (1989). DNA fingerprinting and other methods for the study of mating success. Trends Ecol. Evolut. 4, 139–144.
Cézilly, F. and R. G. Nager (1995). Comparative evidence for a positive association between divorce and extra-pair paternity in birds. Proc. R. Soc. London Ser. B 262, 7–12.
Cressman, R. and A. T. Dash (1991). Strong stability and evolutionary stable strategies with two types of players. J. Math. Biol. 30, 89–99.
Currie, D. R., T. Burke, R. L. Whitney and D. B. A. Thompson (1998). Male and female behaviour and extra-pair paternity in the wheatear. Anim. Behav. 55, 689–703.
Davies, N. (1991). Mating systems, in Behavioural Ecology, 3rd edn, J. R. Krebs and N. B. Davies (Eds), Blackwell Science, pp. 263–294.
Dixon, A., D. Ross, S. L. C. O’Malley and T. Burke (1994). Paternal investment inversely related to degree of extrapair paternity in the reed bunting. Nature 371, 698–700.
Dunn, P. O., A. D. Afton, M. L. Gloutney and R. T. Alisauskas (1999). Forced copulation results in few extrapair fertilizations in Ross’s and lesser snow geese. Anim. Behav. 57, 1071–1081.
Ewen, J. G. and D. P. Armstrong (2000). Male provisioning is negatively correlated with attempted extrapair copulation frequency in the stitchbird (or hihi). Anim. Behav. 60, 429–433.
Jeffreys, A. J., V. Wilson and S. L. Thein (1985). Hypervariable ‘minisatellite’ regions in human DNA. Nature 314, 67–73.
Jennions, M. D. and M. Petrie (2000). Why do females mate multiply? A review of the genetic benefits. Biol. Rev. 75, 21–64.
Johnson, K., E. DuVal, M. Kielt and C. Hughes (2000). Male mating strategies and the mating system of great-tailed grackles. Behav. Ecol. 11, 132–141.
Kempenaers, B. and B. C. Sheldon (1996). Why do male birds not discriminate between their own and extra-pair offspring? Anim. Behav. 51, 1165–1173.
Kempenaers, B. and B. C. Sheldon (1997). Studying paternity and paternal care: pitfalls and problems. Anim. Behav. 53, 423–427.
Kempenaers, B., G. R. Verheyren and A. A. Dhondt (1997). Extra-pair paternity in the blue tit (Parus caeruleus): female choice, male characteristics, and offspring quality. Behav. Ecol. 8, 481–492.
Kempenaers, B., R. B. Lanctot and R. J. Robertson (1998). Certainty of paternity and paternal investment in eastern bluebirds and tree swallows. Anim. Behav. 55, 845–860.
Kempenaers, B., B. Congdon, P. Boag and R. J. Robertson (1999). Extrapair paternity and egg hatchability in tree swallows: evidence for the genetic compatibility hypothesis? Behav. Ecol. 10, 304–311.
Krokene, C., K. Rigstad, M. Dale and J. T. Lifjeld (1998). The function of extrapair paternity in blue tits and great tits: good genes or fertility insurance? Behav. Ecol. 9, 649–656.
Møller, A. P. and J. V. Briskie (1995). Extra-pair paternity, sperm competition and the evolution of testis size in birds. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 46, 357–365.
Møller, A. P. (2000). Male parental care, female reproductive success, and extrapair paternity. Behav. Ecol. 11, 161–168.
Møller, A. P. and J. J. Cuervo (2000). The evolution of paternity and paternal care in birds. Behav. Ecol. 11, 472–485.
Peterson, K. A., K. J. Thusius, L. A. Whittingham and P. O. Dunn (2001). Allocation of male parental care in relation to paternity within and among broods of the common yellowthroat (Geothlypis trichas). Ethology 107, 573–586.
Petrie, M. and B. Kempenaers (1998). Extrapair paternity in birds: explaining variation between species and populations. Trends Ecol. Evol. 13, 52–58.
Selten, R. (1980). A note on evolutionarily stable strategies in asymmetrical animal conflicts. J. Theor. Biol. 84, 93–101.
Sheldon, B. C., K. Rasanen and P. C. Dias (1997). Certainty of paternity and paternal effort in the collared flycatcher. Behav. Ecol. 8, 421–428.
Strohbach, S., E. Curio, A. Bathen, J. T. Epplen and T. Lubjuhn (1998). Extrapair paternity in the great tit (Parus major): a test of the “good genes” hypothesis. Behav. Ecol. 9, 388–396.
Stutchbury, B. J. M. (1998). Extra-pair mating effort of male hooded warblers Wilsonia citrina. Anim. Behav. 55, 553–561.
Trivers, R. L. (1972). Parental investment and sexual selection, in Sexual Selection and the Descent of Man, B. Campbell (Ed.), Aldine.
Wagner, R. H., M. D. Schug and E. S. Morton (1996). Confidence of paternity, actual paternity and parental effort by purple martins. Anim. Behav. 52, 123–132.
Weibull, J. W. (1996). Evolutionary Game Theory, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Whittingham, L. A. and J. T. Lifjeld (1995). High parental investment in unrelated young—extra-pair paternity and male-parental care in house martins. Behav. Ecol. Socbiol. 37, 103–108.
Yezerinac, S. M., P. J. Weatherhead and P. T. Boag (1996). Cuckoldry and lack of parentage-dependent paternal care in yellow warblers: a cost-benefit approach. Anim. Behav. 52, 821–832.
Zeh, J. A. and D. W. Zeh (1996). The evolution of polyandry. 1. Intragenomic conflict and genetic incompatibility. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. Ser. B 263, 1711–1717.
Zeh, J. A. and D. W. Zeh (1997). The evolution of polyandry. 2. Post copulatory defenses against genetic incompatibility. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. Ser. B 264, 69–75.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Fishman, M.A., Stone, L. Fertility assurance through extrapair fertilization, and male parental effort. Bull. Math. Biol. 64, 809–823 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1006/bulm.2002.0301
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1006/bulm.2002.0301