Skip to main content
Log in

Self-organization, scale and stability in a spatial predator-prey interaction

  • Published:
Bulletin of Mathematical Biology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Simple predator-prey models often predict extreme instability in interactions where the prey are depressed well below their carrying capacity. Although the behaviour of some laboratory systems conforms to this pattern, field and mesocosm studies generally show prolonged co-existence of prey and predator. Prominent among the possible causes of this discrepancy are the effects of spatial heterogeneity. In this paper we show that both discrete and continuous representations of the spatial Rosenzweig-McArthur model with immobile prey can be stabilized by self-organized prey heterogeneity. This concordance of behaviour closely parallels that which we have previously established in the context of invasion waves. We use the continuous model variant to calculate the characteristic spatial scales of the self-organized structures. The discrete variant forms the basis of a simulation study demonstrating the variety of stable structures and elucidating their relation to the history of the system. We note that all stable prey distributions take the form of a network of occupied patches separated by prey-free regions, and liken the process which generates such assemblages to the formation of a landscape mozaic.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • De Roos, A. M., E. McCauley and W. G. Wilson (1998). Pattern formation and the spatial scale of interactions between predators and their prey. Theor. Pop. Biol. 53, 108–130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gause, G. F. (1934). The Struggle for Existence, New York: Hafner.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilpin, M. E. (1972). Enriched predator-prey systems: theoretical stability. Science 177, 902–904.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gurney, W. S. C. and R. M. Nisbet (1975). The regulation of inhomogeneous populations. J. Theor. Biol. 52, 441–457.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gurney, W. S. C. and R. M. Nisbet (1976). Spatial pattern and the mechanism of population regulation. J. Theor. Biol. 59, 361–370.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gurney, W. S. C. and R. M. Nisbet (1998). Ecological Dynamics, New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 162–163.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gurney, W. S. C., A. R. Veitch, I. Cruickshank and G. McGeachin (1998). Circles and spirals: population persistence in a spatially explicit predator-prey model. Ecology 79, 2516–2530.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huffaker, C. B. (1958). Experimental studies on predation: dispersion factors and predator-prey oscillations. Hilgardia 27, 343–383.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jansen, V. A. A. (1994). Theoretical aspects of metapopulation dynamics, PhD thesis, University of Leiden, Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jansen, V. A. A. (1995). Regulation of predator-prey systems through spatial interactions: a possible solution to the paradox of enrichment. Oikos 74, 384–390.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jansen, V. A. A. and A. M. de Roos (1998). Predator-prey dynamics across spatial scales: the role of space in reducing population cycles, in The Geometry of Ecological Interactions: Simplifying Spatial Complexity, O. Diekmann, R. Law and A. J. Metz (Eds), Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCauley, E. and W. W. Murdoch (1987). Cyclic and stable populations—plankton as a paradigm. Am. Naturalist 129, 97–121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCauley, E. and W. W. Murdoch (1990). Predator-prey dynamics in environments rich and poor in nutrients. Nature 343, 455–457.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCauley, E., W. G. Wilson and A. M. de Roos (1996). Dynamics of age structured predator-prey populations in space: asymmetrical effects of mobility in juvenile and adult predators. Oikos 76, 485–497.

    Google Scholar 

  • McLaughlin, J. F. and J. Roughgarden (1991). Pattern & stability in predator-prey communities: how diffusion in spatially variable environments affects the Lotka-Volterra model. Theor. Pop. Biol. 40, 148–172.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • McLaughlin, J. F. and J. Roughgarden (1992). Predation across spatial scales in heterogeneous environments. Theor. Pop. Biol. 41, 277–299.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murdoch, W. W., R. M. Nisbet, E. McCauley, A. M. de Roos and W. S. C. Gurney (1998). Plankton abundance and dynamics across nutrient levels: tests of hypotheses. Ecology 79, 1339–1356.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenzweig, M. L. (1971). The paradox of enrichment: the destabilisation of exploitation ecosystems in ecological time. Science 171, 385–387.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gurney, W.S.C., Veitch, A.R. Self-organization, scale and stability in a spatial predator-prey interaction. Bull. Math. Biol. 62, 61–86 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1006/bulm.1999.0130

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1006/bulm.1999.0130

Keywords

Navigation