Skip to main content
Log in

Size hierarchy and stability in competitive plant populations

  • Published:
Bulletin of Mathematical Biology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A neighbourhood-based competition model for plant individuals is studied to evaluate how a hierarchical structure related to size may emerge in plant communities. It is shown by numerical simulations and linear stability analysis that many stable states exist in the hierarchical structure when both the total number of individuals and the degree of asymmetry of competition are high. When the hierarchical structures are self-organized by the dynamic instability of the homogeneous state due to non-linearity of competition, it is proved that these states are always locally stable. The relevance of the results to size structures in real plant communities (boreal forests vs tropical and temperate forests) is discussed. This is suggested to be the mechanism responsible for the coexistence of species in plant communities.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aikman, D. P. and A. R. Watkinson (1980). A model for growth and self-thinning in evenaged monocultures of plants. Ann. Bot. 45, 419–427.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chesson, P. and N. Huntly (1989). Short-term instabilities and long-term community dynamics. Trends Ecol. Evol. 4, 293–298.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ellison, A. M. and D. Rabinowitz (1989). Effects of plant morphology and emergence timeon size hierarchy formation in experimental populations of two varieties of cultivated peas (Pisum sativum). Am. J. Bot. 76, 427–436.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Firbanks, L. G. and A. R. Watkinson (1985). A model of interference within plant monocultures. J. Theor. Biol. 116, 291–311.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fowler, N. L. (1988). What is a safe site?: neighbor, litter, germination date and patch effects. Ecology 69, 947–961.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gates, D. J., A. J. O’Connor and M. Westcott (1979). Partitioning the union of disks in plant competition models. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. Ser. A. 367, 59–79.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Hara, T. (1988). Dynamics of size structure in plant populations. Trends Ecol. Evol. 3, 129–133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hara, T., M. Kimura and K. Kikuzawa (1991). Growth patterns of tree height and stem diameter in populations of Abies veitchii, A. mariesii and Betula ermanii. J. Ecol. 79, 1085–1098.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harper, J. L. (1977). Population Biology of Plants, London: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartgerink, A. P. and F. A. Bazzaz (1984). Seedling-scale environmental heterogeneity influences individual fitness and population structure. Ecology 65, 198–206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hozumi, K. (1975). Studies on the frequency distribution of the weight of individual trees in a forest stand V. The Mw diagram for various types of forest stands. Jpn J. Ecol. 25, 123–131.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keddy, P. A. and B. Shipley (1989). Competitive hierarchies in herbaceous plant communities. Oikos 54, 234–241.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kikuzawa, K. and K. Umeki (1996). Effect of canopy structure on degree of asymmetry of competition in two forest stands in northern Japan. Ann. Bot. 77, 565–571.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kohyama, T. (1993). Size-structured tree populations in gap-dynamic forest—the forest architecture hypothesis for the stable coexistence of species. J. Ecol. 81, 131–143.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lundqvist, L. (1994). Growth and competition in partially cut sub-alpine Norway spruce forests in northern Sweden. For. Ecol. Manage. 65, 115–122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • May, R. M. (1972). Will a large complex system be stable? Nature 238, 413–414.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richards, P. W. (1976). The Tropical Rain Forest: An Ecological Study?, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ross, M. A. and J. L. Harper (1972). Occupation of biological space during seedling establishment. J. Ecol. 64, 77–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sakaguchi, H. (1994). Hierarchical structures in Lotka—Volterra type equations. Phys. Lett. A196, 38–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwinning, S. and G. A. Fox (1995). Population dynamic consequences of competitive symmetry in annual plants. Oikos 72, 422–432.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwinning, S. and J. Weiner (1998). Mechanisms determining the degree of size asymmetry in competition among plants. Oecologia 113, 447–455.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Solbrig, O. T. (1981). Studies on the population biology of the genus Viola. II. The effect of plant size on fitness in Viola sororia. Evolution 35, 1080–1093.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stoll, P., J. Weiner and B. Schmid (1994). Growth variation in a naturally established population of Pinus sylvestris. Ecology 75, 660–670.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, S. C. and F. A. Bazzaz (1993). The genetic component in plant size hierarchies: norms of reaction to density in Polygonum species. Ecol. Monogr. 63, 231–249.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turner, D. M. and D. Rabinowitz (1983). Factors affecting frequency distribution of plant mass: the absence of dominance and suppression in competing monocultures of Festuca paradoxa. Ecology 64, 469–475.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wall, R. and M. Begon (1985). Competition for fitness. Oikos 44, 356–360.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waltman, P. (1983). Competition Models in Population Biology, Philadelphia: Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Warner, R. R. and P. L. Chesson (1985). Coexistence by recruitment fluctuations: a field guide to the storage effect. Am. Nat. 125, 769–787.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weiner, J. (1990). Asymmetric competition in plant populations. Trends Ecol. Evol. 5, 360–364.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weiner, J. and S. C. Thomas (1986). Size variability and competition in plant monocultures. Oikos 47, 211–222.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wyszomirski, T. (1986). Growth, competition and skewness in a population of one-dimensional individuals. Ecol. Pol. 34, 615–641.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yodzis, P. (1987). Competition for Space and the Structure of Ecological Communities, Berlin: Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yokozawa, M. and T. Hara (1992). A canopy photosynthesis model for the dynamics of size structure and self-thinning in plant populations. Ann. Bot. 70, 305–316.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yokozawa, M. and T. Hara (1995). Foliage profile, size structure and stem diameter—plant height relationship in crowded plant populations. Ann. Bot. 76, 271–285.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yokozawa, M. and T. Hara (1999). Global versus local coupling models and theoretical stability analysis of size-structure dynamics in plant populations. Ecol. Model. 118, 61–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yokozawa, M., Y. Kubota and T. Hara (1996). Crown architecture and species coexistence in plant communities. Ann. Bot. 78, 437–447.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yokozawa, M., Y. Kubota and T. Hara (1998). Effects of competition mode on spatial pattern dynamics in plant communities. Ecol. Model. 106, 1–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zobel, M. (1992). Plant species coexistence—the role of historical, evolution and ecological factors. Oikos 65, 314–320.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Yokozawa, M. Size hierarchy and stability in competitive plant populations. Bull. Math. Biol. 61, 949–961 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1006/bulm.1999.0120

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1006/bulm.1999.0120

Keywords

Navigation