Skip to main content
  • 214 Accesses

Abstract

To be supported, corporate conservation must have value both locally and globally. A corporate conservation program must be able to show value to the company and its stakeholders. It should also have demonstrable habitat or ecosystem value. A locally relevant conservation action should be able to be recognized as an example of globally significant corporate citizenship. An individual site-based effort like a grassland restoration project that also acts as an outdoor classroom for a local school will be seen as “more valuable” if it contributes toward a strategic corporate conservation objective. But how is value calculated? How can those with a stake in the success of the effort know that they are on the right road? Calculating value is a challenge across the entire conservation community, where the subject of biodiversity metrics and indicators bedevils conservation practitioners and academics alike. This challenge is also at the core of mainstreaming conservation into the private sector, which is needed in order to fully engage business in the global biodiversity goals of the Convention of Biological Diversity (CBD).

If you don’t know where you are going, any road can take you there.

—LEWIS CARROLL, ALICE IN WONDERLAND

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    David Lindenmayer et al., “Improving Biodiversity Monitoring,” Austral Ecology 37 (2011): 285–94, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1442-9993.2011.02314.x.

  2. 2.

    Dirk S. Schmeller et al., “Advantages of Volunteer-Based Biodiversity Monitoring in Europe,” Conservation Biology 23 (2009): 307–16, https://doi.org10.1111/j.1523-1739.2008.01125.x.

  3. 3.

    Pierre Yves Henry et al., “Integrating Ongoing Biodiversity Monitoring: Potential Benefits and Methods,” Biodiversity and Conservation 17 (2008): 33–57, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-008-9417-1.

  4. 4.

    Jesús Jiménez López and Margarita Mulero-Pázmány, “Drones for Conservation in Protected Areas: Present and Future,” Drones 3, no. 10 (2019).

  5. 5.

    Samantha L. L. Hill et al., “Reconciling Biodiversity Indicators to Guide Understanding and Action,” Conservation Letters 9 (2016): 405–12, https://doi.org/10.1111/conl.12291.

  6. 6.

    Philip Bubb et al., National Indicators, Monitoring, and Reporting for the Strategy for Biodiversity 2011–2020 (Cambridge, UK: UNEP-WCMC, 2011).

  7. 7.

    Henrique M. Pereira and H. David Cooper, “Towards the Global Monitoring of Biodiversity Change,” Trends in Ecology and Evolution 21, no. 3 (2006): 123–29, ISSN 0169-5347, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2005.10.015.

  8. 8.

    UNEP-WCMC and the Proteus Partnership, Biodiversity Indicators for Extractive Companies: An Assessment of Needs, Current Practices, and Potential Indicator Models (New York: United Nations Environment Programme, 2017).

  9. 9.

    Scott Bearer et al., “Environmental Reviews and Case Studies: Evaluating the Scientific Support of Conservation Best Management Practices for Shale Gas Extraction in the Appalachian Basin,” Environmental Practice 14, no. 4 (2012): 308–19, https://doi.org/10.1017/S1466046612000385.

  10. 10.

    Peter W. Roberts and Grahame R. Dowling, “Corporate Reputation and Sustained Superior Financial Performance, Strategic Management Journal 23 (2002): 1077–93, https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.274.

  11. 11.

    Steven A. Melnyk et al., “Assessing the Impact of Environmental Management Systems on Corporate and Environmental Performance,” Journal of Operations Management 21, no. 3 (2003): 329–51, ISSN 0272-6963, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0272-6963(02)00109-2.

  12. 12.

    Haitao Yin and Peter J. Schmeidler, “Why Do Standardized ISO 14001 Environmental Management Systems Lead to Heterogeneous Environmental Outcomes?” Business Strategy and the Environment 18 (2009): 469–86, https://doi.org10.1002/bse.629.

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Margaret O’Gorman

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

O’Gorman, M. (2020). Monitoring, Metrics, and Recognition. In: Strategic Corporate Conservation Planning. Island Press, Washington, DC. https://doi.org/10.5822/978-1-61091-941-8_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics