Abstract
With this broad framework of our legal system, the aims of wildlife law, and the concepts of state ownership and public interest all in place, we turn now to some of the elements of wildlife law that most directly apply to citizens as they interact with animals. Our inquiry starts by considering the main ways in which people gain ownership rights in wild animals, through the well-known rule of capture. We shall explore what actions qualify as lawful capture and then turn to questions involving private land. What rights do landowners have to exclude outside hunters, and who owns animals killed by trespassers? We will similarly look at what happens when a capture takes place in violation of game laws. Assuming a capture is lawful and that a hunter gains rights in an animal, what are those legal rights, how long do they last, and what danger is there that lawmakers might redefine property rights in wildlife after capture has occurred? In chapter 8, we further develop many of these issues by looking at the special legal problems posed by contemporary game ranches.
Notes
- 1.
3 Cai. 175 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 1805).
- 2.
Ghen v. Rich, 8 F. 159 (D. Mass. 1881).
- 3.
Liesner v. Wanie, 145 N.W. 374 (Wis. 1914).
- 4.
State v. Shaw, 65 N.E. 875 (Ohio 1902).
- 5.
People v. Sanders, 696 N.E.2d 1144 (Ill. 1988).
- 6.
Commonwealth v. Haagensen, 900 A.2d 468 (Pa. Commw. 2006).
- 7.
9 S.C.L. (2 Mill.) 244 (S.C. Const. App. 1818).
- 8.
Frame of Government of Pennsylvania § XXII (1683), reprinted in William F. Swinder, ed., Sources and Documents of United States Constitutions, vol. 8 (Dobbs Ferry, NY: Oceana Publications, 1979), 263, 266.
- 9.
VT. CONST. OF 1793/6 CH. II, §40, reprinted in William F. Swinder, ed., Sources and Documents of United States Constitutions, vol. 9 (Dobbs Ferry, NY: Oceana Publications, 1979), 507, 514.
- 10.
John Woods, Two Years’ Residence on the English Prairie of Illinois (Longman, Hurst, Reesa, Orme & Brown, 1822), 284–285.
- 11.
William Elliott, Carolina Sports by Land & Water, Including the Incidents of Devil-Fishing (New York: Arno Press 1967), 166–172.
- 12.
Brian Sawers, Property Law as Labor Control in the Postbellum South, 33 Law and History Review 361 (2015).
- 13.
Or. Rev. Stat. §498.120.
- 14.
State v. Kimble, 237 P.3d 871 (Or. Ct. App. 2010).
- 15.
N.H. Rev. Stat. § 207: 22-a.
- 16.
State v. Brandborg, 857 N.W.2d 83, 85 (N.D. 2014).
- 17.
Alaska. Stat. §11.46.350.
- 18.
Idaho Code §36-1603.
- 19.
Ind. Code § 14-22-10-1.
- 20.
Ohio Rev. Code Ann. §1533.17 (West 2018).
- 21.
State v. Spurlock, 2009 Mont. Dist. LEXIS 559 (Mont. Dist. Ct. 2009).
- 22.
State v. McGregor, 398 P.3d 241, 244 (2017).
- 23.
Rosenthal-Brown Fur Co. v. Jones-Frere Fur Co., 110 So. 630 (La. 1926).
- 24.
Ind. Code §14-22-10-1.
- 25.
19 A. 160 (Me. 1889).
- 26.
211 F.3d 166 (1st Cir. 2000).
- 27.
State ex rel. Visser v. State Fish & Game Commission, 437 P.2d 373 (Mont. 1968).
- 28.
Goff v. Kilts, 15 Wend. 550 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 1836).
- 29.
53 N.Y.S. 781 (App. Div. 1898).
- 30.
Andrus v. Allard, 444 U.S. 51 (1979).
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Eric T. Freyfogle, Dale D. Goble, and Todd A. Wildermuth
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Freyfogle, E., Goble, D.D., Wildermuth, T.A. (2019). Capturing and Owning. In: Wildlife Law. Island Press, Washington, DC. https://doi.org/10.5822/978-1-61091-915-9_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5822/978-1-61091-915-9_3
Publisher Name: Island Press, Washington, DC
Print ISBN: 978-1-64283-098-9
Online ISBN: 978-1-61091-915-9
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)