Advertisement

Whitewash pp 169-187 | Cite as

Uproar in Europe

Chapter
  • 637 Downloads

Abstract

To some, the suggestion seemed more than a little unusual: members of the European Parliament, who were deep into a debate over the risks and rewards of glyphosate in the spring of 2016, should take a close look inside themselves before voting on whether or not to ban the controversial pesticide—literally. The Green Party, whose platform backs environmentally sustainable policies, pushed the idea of a “pee test,” as the press called it, in hopes of demonstrating the pervasiveness of the chemical’s reach and underscoring the very real personal implication of the political decisions being debated. Though some dismissed the idea as a political stunt—a “pissing contest”—48 of the 751 parliament members agreed to submit their urine for scrutiny by researchers at Bio-Check, a diagnostic laboratory located in the German city of Leipzig, Saxony. They handed over their samples in April and awaited the results, though not necessarily with eagerness.

Keywords

European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) International Agency For Research On Cancer (IARC) Joint FAO/WHO Meeting On Pesticide Residues (JMPR) Glyphosate Residues Polyethoxylated Tallow Amine (POEA) 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Copyright information

© Carey Gillam 2017

Authors and Affiliations

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations