Skip to main content

Is The Restoration of Urban Streams Possible?

  • Chapter
Restoring Neighborhood Streams
  • 843 Accesses

Abstract

“It’s just an urban stream,” said the engineering consultant, responding to my request to vegetate the channel rather than line it with plastic geogrid. We are taught that restoring ecologically functioning urban streams and rivers is not possible, based on the belief that urban watersheds are too degraded and their landscapes too altered to support naturally functioning systems. Restoring urban streams and rivers is also not possible, we are told, because it is prohibitively expensive to practice ecological restoration in a setting where land is expensive and other land uses are valued more highly than streams. Restoration is not possible, the argument continues, because the public will not accept the flood and erosion hazards associated with uncontrolled dynamic natural streams in the interiors of cities.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Belden, Edward. 2008. SWIM Site Indicators, San Gabriel Rivers Watershed. Prepared by Aquatic Bioassay and Consulting for the Los Angeles–San Gabriel Watershed Council.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernhardt, Emily S., and Margaret A. Palmer. 2007. “Restoring Streams in an Urbanizing World.” Freshwater Biology 52:738–751.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chin, Anne. 2006. “Urban Transformation of River Landscapes in a Global Context.” Geomorphology 79:460–487.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clayton, Richard. 2000. “Assessing the Potential for Urban Watershed Restoration.” Article 142 in The Practice of Watershed Protection, edited by Thomas R. Schueler and Heather K. Holland, 705–711. Ellicott City, MD: Center for Watershed Protection.

    Google Scholar 

  • Council for Watershed Health. 2014. “Ecology of the Los Angeles River Watershed.” WatershedWise 15 (4):1–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friends of the Los Angeles River. 1995. Proposed Flood Control Strategy for the Los Angeles and San Gabriel River System. Los Angeles: Friends of the Los Angeles River.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garrett, K. L., ed. 1993. The Biota of the Los Angeles River. Los Angeles: Ornithology Department, Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hammer, Thomas R. 1972. “Stream Channel Enlargement due to Urbanization.” RSRI discussion paper series, no 55. Philadelphia: Regional Science Research Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leopold, Luna, Reed Huppman, and Andrew Miller. 2005. “Geomorphic Effects of Urbanization in Forty-One Years of Observation.” American Philosophical Society 149 (3):349–371.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacAdams, Lewis. 2013. “A River Again in Los Angeles.” Los Angeles: Friends of the Los Angeles River.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Neill, Thomas, and Gary Hymel. 1994. All Politics Is Local, and Other Rules of the Game. New York: Times Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riley, A. L. 2009. “Putting a Price on Riparian Corridors as Water Treatment Facilities.” Oakland: California Regional Water Quality Control Board, San Francisco Bay Region.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schumm, S. A., M. D. Harvey, and C. C. Watson. 1984. Incised Channels: Morphology, Dynamics and Control. Littleton, CO: Water Resources Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon, A. 1989. “A Model of Channel Response in Disturbed Alluvial Channels.” Earth Surface Processes and Land Forms 14:11–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stein, E. D., S. Dark, T. Longcore, N. Hall, M. Beland, R. Grossinger, J. Casanova, and M. Sutula. 2007. “Historical Ecology and Landscape Change of the San Gabriel River and Floodplain.” Southern California Coastal Water Research Project Technical Report No. 499, Los Angeles.

    Google Scholar 

  • Surface Water Ambient Monitoring Program. 2008. Water Quality Monitoring of S.F. Bay Area Streams. Oakland: California Regional Water Quality Control Board, San Francisco Bay Region.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watershed Project and Codornices Creek Watershed Council. 2007. “Outreach Plan for the Codornices Creek Watershed.” Final Report, February. Richmond, CA: Watershed Project.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Ann Riley

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Riley, A.L. (2016). Is The Restoration of Urban Streams Possible?. In: Restoring Neighborhood Streams. Island Press, Washington, DC. https://doi.org/10.5822/978-1-61091-741-4_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics