Historical and Projected Climates as a Basis for Climate Change Exposure and Adaptation Potential across the Appalachian Landscape Conservation Cooperative
Global temperatures have risen over the last few decades, and even the most conservative climate models project these trends to continue over the next eighty-five years (IPCC 2013). As climate changes, flora and fauna will be forced to adapt or migrate (Aitken et al. 2008). Many species have been able to adapt to past changes in climate, moving south during glacial periods and north during interglacial periods. However, anthropogenic climate change in most areas is occurring much faster than previous climatic shifts. Flora, in particular, may be unable to adapt or disperse quickly enough to track suitable climate conditions (Corlett and Westcott 2013). Understanding historical and projected future trends in temperature, precipitation, and other climate variables is important for evaluating the current context and likely consequences of climate changes in national parks, and in developing effective strategies for climate adaptation.
KeywordsInternal Climate Variability Great Smoky Mountain Hemlock Woolly Adelgid Great Smoky Mountain National Park Downscaled Climate Projection
- Daly, C., M. Halbleib, J. I. Smith, W. P. Gibson, M. K. Doggett, G. H. Taylor, J. Curtis, and P. P. Pasteris. 2008. Physiographically sensitive mapping of climatological temperature and precipitation across the conterminous United States. International Journal of Climatology 28:2031–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- IPCC. 2013. Summary for policymakers. In Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis, edited by T. F. Stocker, D. Qin, G.-K. Plattner, M. Tignor, S. K. Allen, J. Boschung, A. Nauels, Y. Xia, V. Bex, and P. M. Midgley. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Klausmeyer, K. R., M. R. Shaw, J. B. MacKenzie, and D. R. Cameron. 2011. Landscape-scale indicators of biodiversity’s vulnerability to climate change. Ecosphere 2.Google Scholar
- Leibensperger, E. M., L. J. Mickley, D. J. Jacob, W. T. Chen, J. H. Seinfeld, A. Nenes, P. J. Adams, D. G. Streets, N. Kumar, and D. Rind. 2012. Climatic effects of 1950–2050 changes in US anthropogenic aerosols. Part 2: Climate response. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics 12:3349–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Li, L., W. Li, and Y. Deng. 2013. Summer rainfall variability over the southeastern United States and its intensification in the 21st century as assessed by CMIP5 models. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres 118:340–54.Google Scholar
- Monahan, W. B., and N. A. Fisichelli. 2014. Climate exposure of US national parks in a new era of change. PLOS ONE 9: e101302.Google Scholar
- Mora, C., A. G. Frazier, R. J. Longman, R. S. Dacks, M. M. Walton, E. J. Tong, J. J. Sanchez, L. R. Kaiser, Y. O. Stender, J. M. Anderson, C. M. Ambrosino, I. Fernandez-Silva, L. M. Giuseffi, and T. W. Giambelluca. 2013. The projected timing of climate departure from recent variability. Nature 502:183–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- NOAA (National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration). 2015. National Centers for Environmental Information. http://www.ncei.noaa.gov.
- Robinson, W. A., R. Reudy, and J. E. Hansen. 2002. General circulation model simulations of recent cooling in the east-central United States. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres 107.Google Scholar
- Stein, B. A., P. Glick, N. Edelson, and A. Staudt. 2014. Climate-Smart Conservation: Putting Adaptation Principles into Practice. Washington, DC: National Wildlife Federation.Google Scholar