Abstract
SHOULD CONSERVATION TARGETS, such as the proportion of a region to be placed in protected areas, be socially acceptable from the start? Or should they be based unapologetically on the best available science and expert opinion, then address issues of practicality later? Such questions strike to the philosophical core of conservation. Ambitious targets are often considered radical and value laden, whereas modest targets are ostensibly more objective and reasonable. The personal values of experts are impossible to escape in either case. Conservation professionals of a biocentric bent might indeed err on the side of protecting too much. Anthropocentric bias, however, more commonly affects target setting. The pro-growth norms of global society foster timidity among conservation professionals, steering them toward conformity with the global economic agenda and away from acknowledging what is ultimately needed to sustain life on Earth.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Notes
- 1.
M. R. W. Rands et al., “Biodiversity Conservation: Challenges Beyond 2010,” Science 329 (2010): 1298–1303.
- 2.
C. Perrings et al., “Ecosystem Services for 2020,” Science 330 (2010): 323–24.
- 3.
Convention on Biological Diversity, Strategic Plan for Biodiversity 2011–2020 and the Aichi Targets (Montreal, Canada: Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity, 2010), http://www.cbd.int/doc/strategic-plan/2011-2020/Aichi-Targets-EN.pdf (accessed April 2011).
- 4.
R. F. Noss and A. Y. Cooperrider, Saving Nature’s Legacy: Protecting and Restoring Biodiversity (Washington, D.C.: Island Press, 1994).
- 5.
R. A. Croker, Pioneer Ecologist: The Life and Work of Victor Ernest Shelford 1877–1968 (Washington, D.C.: Smithsonian Institution Press, 1991).
- 6.
Brundtland Commission, Our Common Future: Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development (Oxford, U.K.: Oxford University Press, 1987).
- 7.
Millennium Ecosystem Assessment, Current State and Trends Assessment, Millennium Assessment Report, 2005. Available from http://www.maweb.org/en/ (accessed April 2011).
- 8.
M. Parry, O. Canziani, J. Palutikof, P. van der Linden, and C. Hanson, eds., Climate Change 2007: Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability (Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Working Group 2, 2007).
- 9.
International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN). IUCN Red List of Threatened Species, Version 2010.1 (Gland, Switzerland: IUCN, 2010). Available from http://www.iucnredlist.org/ (accessed April 2011).
- 10.
R. F. Noss, “Protected Areas: How Much Is Enough?” in National Parks and Protected Areas: Their Role in Environmental Protection, ed. R. G. Wright (Cambridge, MA: Blackwell, 1996), pp. 91–120.
- 11.
L. K. Svancara, R. Brannon, J. M. Scott, C. R. Groves, R. F. Noss, and R. L. Pressey, “Policy-Driven vs. Evidence-Based Conservation: A Review of Political Targets and Biological Needs,” Biological Sciences 55 (2005): 989–95.
- 12.
H. Andrén, “Effects of Habitat Fragmentation on Birds and Mammals in Landscapes with Different Proportions of Suitable Habitat: A Review,” Oikos 71 (1994): 355–66.
- 13.
J. Berger, “The Longest Mile: How to Sustain Long Distance Migration in Mammals,” Conservation Biology 18 (2004): 320–32.
- 14.
J. F. Franklin and D. B. Lindenmayer, “Importance of Matrix Habitats in Maintaining Biological Diversity,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 106 (2009): 349–50.
- 15.
New South Wales Government, Great Eastern Ranges Initiative (Sydney: New South Wales Government, 2010). Available from http://www.environment.nsw.gov.au/ger/index.htm (accessed April 2011).
- 16.
Yellowstone to Yukon Conservation Initiative, Yellowstone to Yukon: A Blueprint for Wildlife Conservation (Canmore, Alberta: Yellowstone to Yukon Conservation Initiative, 2010). Available from http://www.y2y.net/data/1/rec_docs/675_A_Blueprint_for_Wildlife_Conservation_reduced.pdf (accessed April 2011).
- 17.
W. Jetz, D. S. Wilcove, and A. P. Dobson, “Projected Impacts of Climate and Land-Use Change on the Global Diversity of Birds,” PLoS Biology (2007). doi:10.1371/journal.pbio0050157.
- 18.
D. E. Bunker, F. DeClerck, J. C. Bradford, R. K. Colwell, I. Perfecto, O. L. Phillips, M. Sankaran, and S. Naeem, “Species Loss and Above-ground Carbon Storage in a Tropical Forest,” Science 310 (2005): 1029–31.
- 19.
Rands et al., “Biodiversity Conservation: Challenges Beyond 2010,” 1298–1303.
- 20.
Happy Planet Index, The Happy Planet Index: Version 2.0 (London: Happy Planet Index, 2010). Available from http://www.happyplanetindex.org/ (accessed April 2011).
- 21.
M. E. Soulé and J. Terborgh, eds., Continental Conservation: Scientific Foundations of Regional Reserve Networks (Washington, D.C.: Island Press, 1999).
- 22.
R. A. Croker, Pioneer Ecologist: The Life and Work of Victor Ernest Shelford 1877–1968.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 by the Foundation for Deep Ecology
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Noss, R.F. et al. (2015). Bolder Thinking for Conservation. In: Wuerthner, G., Crist, E., Butler, T. (eds) Protecting the Wild. Island Press, Washington, DC. https://doi.org/10.5822/978-1-61091-551-9_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5822/978-1-61091-551-9_2
Publisher Name: Island Press, Washington, DC
Print ISBN: 978-1-59726-111-1
Online ISBN: 978-1-61091-551-9
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)