Skip to main content
  • 6478 Accesses

Abstract

At the outset of any redesign or reconstruction, designers set forth key criteria that govern the ensuing design of the street. These parameters, referred to here as “design controls,” critically shape design decisions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

Design Speed

  • Ashton, S.J. and G.M. MacKay. “Some characteristics of the population who suffer trauma as pedestrians when hit by cars and some resulting implications.” Accident Research Unit: Department of Transportation and Environmental Planning, University of Birmingham, England, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bartmann, A, W. Spijkers, and M. Hess. “Street Environment, Driving Speed and Field of Vision.” In Vision in Vehicles III, edited by A.G. Gale et al, 281–389. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science Publishers B.V., 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosén E., J.E. Kallhammer, D. Eriksson, M. Nentwich, R. Fredriksson, and K. Smith. “Pedestrian injury mitigation by autonomous braking.” Accident; Analysis and Prevention 42 (2010): 1949–1957.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosén E., H. Stigson, and U. Sander. “Literature review of pedestrian fatality risk as a function of car impact.” Accident; Analysis and Prevention 43 (2011): 25–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Performance Measures

  • The following references correspond to the list of alternative performance measures on p. 166:

    Google Scholar 

  • Dowling, Richard. Multimodal Level of Service Analysis for Urban Streets: Users Guide, Appendix D to Contractor’s Final Report for NCHRP Project 3–70. Oakland: National Cooperative Highway Research Program, 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Research Council (U.S.). Highway Capacity Manual. Washington, D.C.: Transportation Research Board, National Research Council (2000): Ch. 13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gehl, Jan. Cities for People. Washington, D.C.: Island Press, 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sanders, Rebecca, Elizabeth Macdonald, and Alia Anderson. “Performance Measures for Complete, Green Streets: A Proposal for Urban Arterials in California.” Paper presented at the Transportation Research Board 88th Annual Meeting, Washington, D.C., January 11–15, 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sanders, Rebecca, Elizabeth Macdonald, Alia Anderson, David R. Ragland, Jill F. Cooper. Performance Measures for Complete, Green Streets: Initial Findings for Pedestrian Safety along a California Corridor. Berkeley: Safe Transportation Research & Education Center, 2011

    Google Scholar 

  • UCLA Center for Occupational and Environmental Health. Walkability & Pedestrian Safety in Boyle Heights Using the Pedestrian Environmental Quality Index (PEQI) Los Angeles: University of California Los Angeles, 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sprinkle Consulting Inc. Bicycle Level of Service Applied Model. Tampa: 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bicycle Compatibility Index. Washington, D.C.: USDOT Federal Highway Administration.

    Google Scholar 

  • Similar to the Pedestrian Environmental Quality Index, BEQI was developed by the San Francisco Department of Public Health: San Francisco Department of Public Health. “Bicycle Environmental Quality Index.” Accessed June 3, 2013. http://www.sfphes.org/elements/24-elements/tools/102-bicycle-environmental-quality-index.

  • National Research Council (U.S.). Highway Capacity Manual. Washington, D.C.: Transportation Research Board, National Research Council (2000).

    Google Scholar 

  • Texas Transportation Institute. 2012 Urban Mobility Report. College Station: Texas Transportation Institute, 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  • American Public Transportation Association. 2011 Public Transportation Fact Book. Washington, D.C.: American Public Transportation Association, 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindquist, Kathy, Michel Wendt, and James Holbrooks. Transit Farebox Recovery and US and International Transit Subsidization. Olympia: WSDOT, 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  • AASHTO. A Policy on Geometric Design of Highways and Streets. Washington, D.C.: American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, 2011. Section 2–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • ITE. Designing Walkable Urban Thoroughfares: A Context Sensitive Approach. Washington, D.C.: Institute of Transportation Engineers, 2010.

    Google Scholar 

Functional Classification

  • Forbes, Gerry. “Urban Roadway Classification: Before the Design Begins.” Paper presented at the Urban Street Symposium, TRB Circular E-C019, Dallas, Texas, June 28–30, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marshall, Stephen, Peter Jones, and Ian Plowright. A Framework for Classification and Assessment of Arterial Streets. London: University of Westminster, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Consortia

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 National Association of City Transportation Officials

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

NACTO. (2013). Design Controls. In: Urban Street Design Guide. Island Press, Washington, DC. https://doi.org/10.5822/978-1-61091-534-2_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics