Skip to main content

Methods for Generating Land suitability Maps: A Comparative Evaluation

Journal of the American Planning Association (1977)

  • Chapter
The Ecological Design and Planning Reader

Abstract

Land resource inventories to determine land suitabilities have become a standard part of planning analysis at many scales. Any attempt to review, compare, evaluate, or improve upon the myriad of case studies, many only partially documented and in limited circulation, suffers from the lack of reference to a common framework. This article develops a general statement of the purpose and character of land suitability analysis, a taxonomy of existing methods for identifying homogeneous areas and rating them as to suitability for specific uses, and a comparative evaluation of these methods.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Alexander, Christopher. Notes on the Synthesis of Form. Vol. 5. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1964.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alexander, Christopher, and Marvin L. Manheim. “The Use of Diagrams in Highway Route Location: An Experiment.” Research Report R62-3. Cambridge, MA: Department of Civil Engineering, MIT, 1962.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barlowe, Raleigh. Land Resource Economics. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brandes, Charles. Methods of Synthesis for Ecological Planning. Master’s thesis, Department of Landscape Architecture and Regional Planning, University of Pennsylvania, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buyhoff, G., P. Miller, J. Roach, D. Zhou, and L. Fuller. “An Artificial Intelligence Methodology for Landscape Visual Assessment.” Artifical Intelligence Applications Journal 8, no. 1 (1994): 1–2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carmone, Frank J., and Paul E. Green. Multidimensional Scaling and Related Techniques in Marketing Analysis. Boston: Allyn and Bacon, 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  • Durfee, R. C. The Use of Factor and Cluster Analysis in Regional Modeling. ORNL-TM-3720. Oak Ridge, TN: Oak Ridge National Laboratory, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fabos, Julius Gy, and Stephanie J. Caswell. “Composite Landscape Assessment.” Research Bulletin no. 637. Amherst: Massachusetts Agricultural Experiment Station, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, Myrick. “Project Design and Evaluation with Multiple Objectives.” In Public Expenditures and Policy Analysis, edited by Robert H. Haveman and Julius Margolis. Chicago: Markham, 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gold, Andrew J. “Design with Nature: A Critique.” Journal of the American Institute of Planners 40, no. 4 (1974): 284–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hill, Morris, and Yigal Tzamir. “Multidimensional Evaluation of Regional Plans Serving Multiple Objectives.” Papers in Regional Science 29, no. 1 (1972): 139–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hills, G. Angus. The Ecological Basis for Land-Use Planning. Ontario Department of Lands and Forests, Research Branch, 1961.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hopkins, Lewis D. “Design Method Evaluation—An Experiment with Corridor Selection.” Socio-Economic Planning Sciences 7, no. 5 (1973): 423–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hopkins, Lewis D., R. Bruce Wood, Debra Brochmann, and Louis Messina. Environmental Impact Statements: A Handbook for Writers and Reviewers. No. IIEQ-73-8. Illinois Institute for Environmental Quality. Report no. PB 226 276/AS. Springfield, VA: National Technical Information Service, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ingmire, Thomas J., and Tito Patri. “An Early Warning System for Regional Planning.” Journal of the American Institute of Planners 37, no. 6 (1971): 403–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Juneja, Narendra. Medford, Performance Requirements for the Maintenance of Social Values Represented by the Natural Environment of Medford Township, NJ. Center for Ecological Research in Planning and Design, Department of Landscape Architecture and Regional Planning, University of Pennsylvania, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kiefer, Ralph W. “Land Evaluation for Land Use Planning.” Building Sciences 1, no. 2 (1965): 109–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Landscape Architecture Research Office. The Interaction between Urbanization and Land: Quality and Quantity in Environmental Plannin and Design—Progress Report for Years One, Two and Three, Proposal for Year Four. Cambridge, MA: Gradaute School of Design, Harvard University, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, Philip H. “Ecology: The Inland Water Tree.” Journal of the American Institute of Architects 51, no. 8 (1969): 59–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lyle, John, and Mark Von Wodtke. “An Information System for Environmental Planning.” Journal of the American Institute of Planners 40, no. 6 (1974): 394–413.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacDougall, E. Bruce, and Charles E. Brandes. “A Selected Annotated Bibliography on Land Resource Inventory and Analysis for Planning.” Harrisburg, PA: Department of Environmental Resources, Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, 1974

    Google Scholar 

  • Maranell, Gary Michael. Scaling: A Sourcebook for Behavioral Scientists. Chicago: Aldine, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  • McHarg, Ian L. Design with Nature. New York: American Museum of Natural History, 1969.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murray, Timothy, Peter Rogers, David Sinton, Carl Steinitz, Richard Toth, and Douglas Way. Honey Hill: A Systems Analysis for Planning the Multiple Use of Controlled Water Areas. 2 vols. Report nos. AD 736343 and AD 736344. Springfield, VA: National Technical Information Service, 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patri, Tito, David C. Streatfield, and Thomas J. Ingmire. The Santa Cruz Mountains Regional Pilot Study: Early Warning System. Berkeley: Deparment of Landscape Architecture, University of California, 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rice Center for Community Design and Research. An Approach to Natural Environmental Analysis. Houston: The Center, 1974

    Google Scholar 

  • Schlager, Kenneth J. “A Land Use Plan Design Model.” Journal of the American Institute of Planners 31, no. 2 (1965): 103–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simon, Herbert A. The Sciences of the Artificial. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. 1969.

    Google Scholar 

  • Southeastern Wisconsin Regional Planning Commission. A Land Use Plan Design Model: Volume 1; Model Development: Volume 2; Model Test: Volume 3: Final Report. Waukesha WI: Southeastern Wisconsin Regional Planning Commission, 1968, 1969, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steinitz, Carl, Paul Parker, and Lawrie Jordan. “Hand-Drawn Overlays: Their History and Prospective Uses.” Landscape Architecture 66, no. 5 (1976): 444–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Storie, R. Earl. “An Index for Rating the Agricultural Value of Soils.” Bulletin 556. Berkeley: California Agricultural Experiment Station, 1933.

    Google Scholar 

  • Voelker, A. H. Indices: A Technique for Using Large Spatial Databases. ORNL/RUS-15. Oak Ridge, TN: Oak Ridge National Laboratory, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallace-McHarg Associates. Technical Report on the Plan for the Valleys. 2 vols. Philadelphia: Wallace-McHarg Associates, 1964.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ward, Wesley, and Donald P. Grant. “A Computer-Aided Spatial Allocation Technique.” In Proceedings of the Kentucky Workshop on Computer Applications to Environmental Design, edited by Michael Kennedy. Lexington, KY: College of Architecture, University of Kentucky, 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitman, Ira L. “Design of an Environmental Evaluation System.” National Technical Information Service, no. PB 201 (1971): 743.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Forster O. Ndubisi

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Hopkins, L.D. (2014). Methods for Generating Land suitability Maps: A Comparative Evaluation. In: Ndubisi, F.O. (eds) The Ecological Design and Planning Reader. Island Press, Washington, DC. https://doi.org/10.5822/978-1-61091-491-8_30

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics