Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Biogeochemical Responses to Tidal Restoration

  • Chapter
Tidal Marsh Restoration

Part of the book series: The Science and Practice of Ecological Restoration ((SPER))

Abstract

Restoration of tides to a tide-restricted marsh sets into motion significant changes in the biogeochemistry of the marsh. These biogeochemical changes affect the suitability of the marsh for different species of vegetation, nekton, and birds, and set the context for the long-term development of the marsh. In turn, changes in vegetation and nekton can substantially modify the biogeochemistry of the marsh.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Andrews, J. E., D. Burgess, R. R. Cave, E. G. Coombes, T. D. Jickells, D. J. Parkes, and R. K. Turner. 2006. “Biogeochemical Value of Managed Realignment, Humber Estuary, UK.” Science of the Total Environment 371:19–30.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Andrews, J. E., G. Samways, and G. B. Shimmield. 2008. “Historical Storage Budgets of Organic Carbon, Nutrient and Contaminant Elements in Saltmarsh Sediments: Biogeochemical Context for Managed Realignment, Humber Estuary, UK.” Science of the Total Environment 405:1–13.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Anisfeld, S. C., and G. Benoit. 1997. “Impacts of Flow Restrictions on Salt Marshes: An Instance of Acidification.” Environmental Science & Technology 31:1650–57.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Anisfeld, S. C., M. J. Tobin, and G. Benoit. 1999. “Sedimentation Rates in Flow-Restricted and Restored Salt Marshes in Long Island Sound.” Estuaries 22:231–44.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bakker, J. P., P. Esselink, K. S. Dijkema, W. E. van Duin, and D. J. de Jong. 2002. “Restoration of Salt Marshes in the Netherlands.” Hydrobiologia 478:29–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blackwell, M. S. A., D. V. Hogan, and E. Maltby. 2004. “The Short-Term Impact of Managed Realignment on Soil Environmental Variables and Hydrology.” Estuarine Coastal and Shelf Science 59:687–701.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Boumans, R. M. J., D. M. Burdick, and M. Dionne. 2002. “Modeling Habitat Change in Salt Marshes after Tidal Restoration.” Restoration Ecology 10:543–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burdick, D. M., M. Dionne, R. M. Boumans, and F. T. Short. 1997. “Ecological Responses to Tidal Restorations of Two Northern New England Salt Marshes.” Wetlands Ecology and Management 4:129–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cahoon, D. R., J. C. Lynch, B. C. Perez, B. Segura, R. D. Holland, C. Stelly, G. Stephenson, and P. Hensel. 2002. “High-Precision Measurements of Wetland Sediment Elevation, II: The Rod Surface Elevation Table.” Journal of Sedimentary Research 72:734–39.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chang, Y. H., M. D. Scrimshaw, C. L. Macleod, and J. N. Lester. 2001. “Flood Defence in the Blackwater Estuary, Essex, UK: The Impact of Sedimentological and Geochemical Changes on Salt Marsh Development in the Tollesbury Managed Realignment Site.” Marine Pollution Bulletin 42:470–81.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cornu, C. E., and S. Sadro. 2002. “Physical and Functional Responses to Experimental Marsh Surface Elevation Manipulation in Coos Bay's South Slough.” Restoration Ecology 10:474–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Craft, C., J. Reader, J. N. Sacco, and S. W. Broome. 1999. “Twenty-five Years of Ecosystem Development of Constructed Spartina alterniflora (Loisel) Marshes.” Ecological Applications 9:1405–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Craft, C., P. Megonigal, S. Broome, J. Stevenson, R. Freese, J. Cornell, L. Zheng, and J. Sacco. 2003. “The Pace of Ecosystem Development of Constructed Spartina alterniflora Marshes.” Ecological Applications 13:1417–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dent, D. L., E. J. B. Downing, and H. Rogaar. 1976. “Changes in Structure of Marsh Soils following Drainage and Arable Cultivation.” Journal of Soil Science 27:250–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • French, P. W. 2006. “Managed Realignment: The Developing Story of a Comparatively New Approach to Soft Engineering.” Estuarine Coastal and Shelf Science 67:409–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frenkel, R. E., and J. C. Morlan. 1991. “Can We Restore Our Salt Marshes? Lessons from the Salmon River, Oregon.” Northwest Environmental Journal 7:119–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartig, E. K., V. Gornitz, A. Kolker, F. Mushacke, and D. Fallon. 2002. “Anthropogenic and Climate-Change Impacts on Salt Marshes of Jamaica Bay, New York City.” Wetlands 22:71–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). 2007. “Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change.” Climate Change 2007: Synthesis Report. Geneva: IPCC. www.ipcc.ch/publications_and_data/ar4/syr/en/contents.html.

  • Konisky, R. A., D. M. Burdick, M. Dionne, and H. A. Neckles. 2006. “A Regional Assessment of Salt Marsh Restoration and Monitoring in the Gulf of Maine.” Restoration Ecology 14:516–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Macleod, C. L., M. D. Scrimshaw, R. H. C. Emmerson, Y. H. Chang, and J. N. Lester. 1999. “Geochemical Changes in Metal and Nutrient Loading at Orplands Farm Managed Retreat Site, Essex, UK (April 1995–1997).” Marine Pollution Bulletin 38:1115–25.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Maris, T., T. Cox, S. Temmerman, P. De Vleeschauwer, S. Van Damme, T. De Mulder, E. Van den Bergh, and P. Meire. 2007. “Tuning the Tide: Creating Ecological Conditions for Tidal Marsh Development in a Flood Control Area.” Hydrobiologia 588:31–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, P. A., and F. T. Short. 2002. “Using Functional Trajectories to Track Constructed Salt Marsh Development in the Great Bay Estuary, Maine/New Hampshire, USA.” Restoration Ecology 10:461–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neckles, H. A., M. Dionne, D. M. Burdick, C. T. Roman, R. Buchsbaum, and E. Hutchins. 2002. “A Monitoring Protocol to Assess Tidal Restoration of Salt Marshes on Local and Regional Scales.” Restoration Ecology 10:556–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paquette, C. H., K. L. Sundberg, R. M. J. Boumans, and G. L. Chmura. 2004. “Changes in Saltmarsh Surface Elevation due to Variability in Evapotranspiration and Tidal Flooding.” Estuaries 27:82–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pethick, J. 2002. “Estuarine and Tidal Wetland Restoration in the United Kingdom: Policy versus Practice.” Restoration Ecology 10:431–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Portnoy, J. W. 1991. “Summer Oxygen Depletion in a Diked New England Estuary.” Estuaries 14:122–29.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Portnoy, J. W. 1999. “Salt Marsh Diking and Restoration: Biogeochemical Implications of Altered Wetland Hydrology.” Environmental Management 24:111–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Portnoy, J. W., and J. R. Allen. 2006. “Effects of Tidal Restrictions and Potential Benefits of Tidal Restoration on Fecal Coliform and Shellfish-Water Quality.” Journal of Shellfish Research 25:609–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Portnoy, J. W., and A. E. Giblin. 1997a. “Effects of Historic Tidal Restrictions on Salt Marsh Sediment Chemistry.” Biogeochemistry 36:275–303.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Portnoy, J. W., and A. E. Giblin. 1997b. “Biogeochemical Effects of Seawater Restoration to Diked Salt Marshes.” Ecological Applications 7:1054–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Portnoy, J. W., and I. Valiela. 1997. “Short-Term Effects of Salinity Reduction and Drainage on Salt-Marsh Biogeochemical Cycling and Spartina (cordgrass) Production.” Estuaries 20:569–78.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Roman, C. T., R. W. Garvine, and J. W. Portnoy. 1995. “Hydrologic Modeling as a Predictive Basis for Ecological Restoration of Salt Marshes.” Environmental Management 19:559–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rotman, R., L. Naylor, R. McDonnell, and C. MacNiocaill. 2008. “Sediment Transport on the Freiston Shore Managed Realignment Site: An Investigation Using Environmental Magnetism.” Geomorphology 100:241–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rozsa, R. 1995. “Tidal Wetland Restoration in Connecticut.” Pp. 51–65 in Tidal Marshes of Long Island Sound: Ecology, History and Restoration, edited by G. D. Dreyer and W. A. Niering. New London, CT: Connecticut College Arboretum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Short, F. T., D. M. Burdick, C. A. Short, R. C. Davis, and P. Morgan. 2000. “Developing Success Criteria for Restored Eelgrass, Salt Marsh and Mud Flat Habitats.” Ecological Engineering 15:239–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Soukup, M. A., and J. W. Portnoy. 1986. “Impacts from Mosquito Control-Induced Sulphur Mobilization in a Cape Cod Estuary.” Environmental Conservation 13:47–50.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Spencer, K. L., A. B. Cundy, S. Davies-Hearn, R. Hughes, S. Turner, and C. L. MacLeod. 2008. “Physicochemical Changes in Sediments at Orplands Farm, Essex, UK following 8 Years of Managed Realignment.” Estuarine Coastal and Shelf Science 76:608–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turner, R. E. 2004. “Coastal Wetland Subsidence Arising from Local Hydrologic Manipulations.” Estuaries 27:265–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Warren, R. S., P. E. Fell, R. Rozsa, A. H. Brawley, A. C. Orsted, E. T. Olson, V. Swamy, and W. A. Niering. 2002. “Salt Marsh Restoration in Connecticut: 20 Years of Science and Management.” Restoration Ecology 10:497–513.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, P. B., and M. K. Orr. 2002. “Physical Evolution of Restored Breached Levee Salt Marshes in the San Francisco Bay Estuary.” Restoration Ecology 10:527–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zedler, J. B., and J. C. Callaway. 1999. “Tracking Wetland Restoration: Do Mitigation Sites Follow Desired Trajectories?” Restoration Ecology 7:69–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This chapter was greatly improved by the comments, suggestions, and edits of David Burdick and two anonymous reviewers.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Yale University School of Forestry and Environmental Studies, USA

    Shimon C. Anisfeld (senior lecturer and research scientist)

Authors
  1. Shimon C. Anisfeld
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. University of Rhode Island’s Graduate School of Oceanography, USA

    Charles T. Roman (professor-in-residence) (professor-in-residence)

  2. Department of Natural Resources and the Jackson Estuarine Laboratory, University of New Hampshire, USA

    David M. Burdick (associate professor) (associate professor)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Island Press

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Anisfeld, S.C. (2012). Biogeochemical Responses to Tidal Restoration. In: Roman, C.T., Burdick, D.M. (eds) Tidal Marsh Restoration. The Science and Practice of Ecological Restoration. Island Press, Washington, DC. https://doi.org/10.5822/978-1-61091-229-7_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation