The Use and Misuse of Species-Area Relationships in Predicting Climate-Driven Extinction

  • John Harte
  • Justin Kitzes
Chapter

Abstract

Thomas et al. (2004) pioneered the estimate of extinction risk due to climate change by coupling species range-loss simulations from species distribution models with species-loss estimates from the species-area relationships (SARs). Unfortunately, numerous conceptual and practical problems permeate this seemingly solid and straightforward approach. Chapter 4 explored developments in climate envelope modeling. Here we focus on the challenges associated with applying a SAR approach to climate-driven extinction estimates and propose a novel application of recent Maximum Entropy (MaxEnt) theory in ecology that may help to address some of them.

References

  1. Diamond, Jared. 1975. “The island dilemma: Lessons of modern biogeographic studies for the design of natural reserves.” Biological Conservation 7: 129-146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Donoghue, Michael J. 2008. “A phylogenetic perspective on the distribution of plant diversity.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 105 (Supplement 1): 11549-11555.Google Scholar
  3. Drakare, Stina, Jack J. Lennon, and Helmut Hillebrand. 2006. “The imprint of the geographical, evolutionary and ecological context on species-area relationships.” Ecology Letters 9 (2): 215-227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Dunne, Jennifer A., Richard J. Williams, and Neo D. Martinez. 2002. “Network structure and biodiversity loss in food webs: Robustness increases with connectance.” Ecology Letters 5 (4): 558-567.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Harte, John, and Ann P. Kinzig. 1997. “On the implications of species-area relationships for endemism, spatial turnover, and food web patterns.” Oikos 80 (3): 417-427.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Harte, John, Sarah McCarthy, Kevin Taylor, Ann Kinzig, and Marc L. Fischer. 1999. “Estimating species-area relationships from plot to landscape scale using species spatial-turnover data.” Oikos 86 (1): 45-54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Harte, John, Annette Ostling, Jessica L. Green, and Ann Kinzig. 2004. “Biodiversity conservation—Climate change and extinction risk.” Nature 430 (6995).Google Scholar
  8. Harte, J., T. Zillio, E. Conlisk, and A. B. Smith. 2008. “Maximum entropy and the state-variable approach to macroecology.” Ecology 89 (10): 2700-2711.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Harte, John, Adam B. Smith, and David Storch. 2009. “Biodiversity scales from plots to biomes with a universal species-area curve.” Ecology Letters 12 (8): 789-797.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. He, F., and P. Legendre. 2002. “Species diversity patterns derived from species-area models.” Ecology 83 (5): 1185-1198.Google Scholar
  11. He, F., and S. P. Hubbell. 2011. “Species-area relationships always overestimate extinction rates from habitat loss.” Nature 473: 368-371.Google Scholar
  12. Hubbell, Stephen P. 2001. The Unified Neutral Theory of Biodiversity and Biogeography. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Kinzig, Ann P., and John Harte. 2000. “Implications of endemics-area relationships for estimates of species extinctions.” Ecology 81 (12): 3305-3311.Google Scholar
  14. Kunin, William E. 1997. “Sample shape, spatial scale and species counts: Implications for reserve design.” Biological Conservation 82 (3): 369-377.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Kuussaari, Mikko, Riccardo Bommarco, Risto K. Heikkinen, Aveliina Helm, Jochen Krauss, Regina Lindborg, Erik Ockinger, et al. 2009. “Extinction debt: A challenge for biodiversity conservation.” Trends in Ecology & Evolution 24 (10): 564-571.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Lomolino, Mark V 2001. “The species-area relationship: New challenges for an old pattern.” Progress in Physical Geography 25 (1-21): 1.Google Scholar
  17. May, Robert M. 1975. “Patterns of species abundance and diversity.” In Ecology and Evolution of Communities. Edited by Martin L. Cody and Jared M. Diamond. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  18. Ney-Nifle, Muriel, and Marc Mangel. 2000. “Habitat loss and changes in the species-area relationship.” Conservation Biology 14 (3): 893-898.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Plotkin, Joshua B., Matthew D. Potts, Douglas W. Yu, Sarayudh Bunyavejchewin, Richard Condit, Robin Foster, Stephen Hubbell, et al. 2000a. “Predicting species diversity in tropical forests.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 97 (20): 10850-10854.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Plotkin, Joshua B., Matthew D. Potts, Nandi Leslie, N. Manokaran, James LaFrankie, and Peter S. Ashton. 2000b. “Species-area curves, spatial aggregation, and habitat specialization in tropical forests.” Journal of Theoretical Biology 207 (1): 81-99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Preston, Frank W. 1962. “The canonical distribution of commonness and rarity: Part I.” Ecology 43 (2): 185-215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Rosenzweig, Michael L. 1995. Species Diversity in Space and Time. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Soule, Michael E. 1986. Conservation Biology: The Science of Scarcity and Diversity. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer Associates.Google Scholar
  24. Soule, Michael E., Bruce A. Wilcox, and Claire Holtby. 1979. “Benign neglect: A model of faunal collapse in the game reserves of East Africa.” Biological Conservation 15 (4): 259-272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Srinivasan, U. Thara, Jennifer A. Dunne, John Harte, and Neo D. Martinez. 2007. “Response of complex food webs to realistic extinction sequences.” Ecology 88 (3): 671-682.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Thomas, Chris D., Alison Cameron, Rhys E. Green, Michel Bakkenes, Linda J. Beaumont, Yvonne C. Collingham, Barend F. N. Erasmus, et al. 2004. “Extinction risk from climate change.” Nature 427 (6970): 145-148.Google Scholar
  27. Tilman, David, Robert M. May, Clarence L. Lehman, and Martin A. Nowak. 1994. “Habitat destruction and the extinction debt.” Nature 371 (6492): 6566.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Island Press 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • John Harte
    • 1
  • Justin Kitzes
    • 1
  1. 1.University of California-BerkeleyBerkeleyUSA

Personalised recommendations