Restoration and Stewardship Volunteerism

Part of the Society for Ecological Restoration book series (SPER)


Recent scholars writing on the topic of ecological restoration propose a holistic view of ecosystem restoration wherein both ecosystem needs and human needs must be considered in the design and implementation of restoration projects. Such a view suggests that both ecosystems and restoration practitioners benefit from restoration projects (Higgs 2003; Clewell and Aronson 2006, 2007; Light 2008). Within this reciprocal relationship, humans contribute ecological knowledge, techniques, participation, and commitment that benefit degraded ecosystems (see chap. 18, this volume). Conversely, involvement in restoration projects contributes to human well-being in a variety of ways including restoring ecosystem values, such as biodiversity and natural capital. Such actions also provide participants with psychological, physiological, economic and spiritual benefits, including learning new things, connecting with the natural environment, earning a living, doing something worthwhile, making amends for human-caused environmental damage, and realizing personally renewing experiences (Miles, Sullivan, and Kuo 2000; Clewell and Aronson 2006; chap. 16, this volume). Geist and Galatowitsch (1999) among others suggest that, while critical to successful ecological restoration, scientific knowledge alone cannot ensure success. Ongoing human participation and commitment are critical to ensuring the long-term success and sustainability of restoration projects.


  1. Ajzen, I. 1991. “The Theory of Planned Behavior.” Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 50: 179–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ajzen, I., and M. Fishbein. 1980. Understanding Attitudes and Predicting Social Behavior. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  3. Boldero, J. 1995. “The Prediction of Household Recycling of Newspapers: The Role of Attitudes, Intentions, and Situational Factors.” Journal of Applied Social Psychology 25 (5): 440–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bright, A. D., M. J. Manfredo, and D. C. Fulton. 2000. “Segmenting the Public: An Application of Value Orientations to Wildlife Planning in Colorado.” Wildlife Society Bulletin 28 (1): 218–26.Google Scholar
  5. Brown, E. 2000. “The Scope of Volunteer Activity and Public Service.” Law and Contemporary Problems 62 (4): 17–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Christie, J. 2004. “Volunteer Attitudes and Motivations: Research Findings and Their Application for Sustainable Community Involvement Programs in Natural Resource Management.” In Conference Proceedings of Effective Sustainability Education: What Works? Why? Where Next? Linking Research and Practice. Sydney, Australia, February 18–20, 2004,
  7. Clary, E. G., and M. Snyder. 1999. “The Motivations to Volunteer: Theoretical and Practical Considerations.” Current Directions in Psychological Science 9 (5): 156–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Clewell, A. F., and J. Aronson. 2006. “Motivations for the Restoration of Ecosystems.” Conservation Biology 20 (2): 420–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Clewell, A. F. 2007. Ecological Restoration: Principles, Values and Structure of an Emerging Profession. Washington, DC: Island Press.Google Scholar
  10. Corraliza, J. A., and J. Berenguer. 2000. “Environmental Values, Beliefs, and Actions: A Situational Approach.” Environment and Behavior 32 (6): 832–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Curtis, A., and T. DeLacy. 1998. “Landcare, Stewardship and Sustainable Agriculture in Australia.” Environmental Values 7: 59–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Donald, B. J. 1997. “Fostering Volunteerism in an Environmental Stewardship Group: A Report on the Task Force to Bring Back the Don, Toronto, Canada.” Journal of Environmental Planning and Management 40 (4): 483–505.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Fishbein, M., and I. Ajzen. 1975. Belief, Attitude, Intention, and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
  14. Fulton, D. C., M. J. Manfredo, and J. Lipscomb. 1996. “Wildlife Value Orientations: A Conceptual and Measurement Approach.” Human Dimensions of Wildlife 1: 24–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Geist, C., and S. M. Galatowitsch. 1999. “Reciprocal Model for Meeting Ecological and Human Needs in Restoration Projects.” Conservation Biology 13 (5): 970–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Gill, J. D., L. A. Crosby, and J. R. Taylor. 1986. “Ecological Concern, Attitudes, and Social Norms in Voting Behavior.” Public Opinion Quarterly 50: 537–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Gooch, M. 2004. “Volunteering in Catchment Management Groups: Empowering the Volunteer.” Australian Geographer 35 (2): 193–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Gotch, C., and T. Hall. 2004. “Understanding Nature-Related Behaviors among Children through a Theory of Reasoned Action Approach.” Environmental Education Research 10 (2): 21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Grese, R. E., R. Kaplan, R. L. Ryan, and J. Buxton. 2000. “Psychological Benefits of Volunteering in Stewardship Programs.” In Restoring Nature: Perspectives from the Social Sciences and Humanities, edited by P. H. Gobster and R. B. Hull, 265–80. Washington, DC: Island Press.Google Scholar
  20. Hale, J. L., B. J. Householder, and K. L. Greene. 2003. “The Theory of Reasoned Action.” In The Persuasion Handbook: Developments in Theory and Practice, edited by J. P. Dillard and M. Pfau, 259–86. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  21. Higgs, E. 2003. Nature by Design: People, Natural Process, and Ecological Restoration. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  22. Huang, H-P., and L. P. Yore. 2004. “A Comparative Study of Canadian and Taiwanese Grade 5 Children’s Environmental Behaviors, Attitudes, Concerns, Emotional Disposition, and Knowledge.” International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education 1: 419–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Jordan III, W. R. 2003. The Sunflower Forest: Ecological Restoration and the New Communion with Nature. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  24. Kantola, S. J., G. J. Syme, and N. A. Campbell. 1982. “The Role of Individual Differences and External Variables in a Test of the Sufficiency of Fishbein’s Model to Explain Behavioral Intention to Conserve Water.” Journal of Applied Social Psychology 12: 70–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Kellert, S. R. 1996. The Value of Life: Biological Diversity and Human Society. Washington, DC: Island Press.Google Scholar
  26. Leopold, A. 1949. A Sand County Almanac: And Sketches Here and There. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  27. Light, A. 2002. “Restoring Ecological Citizenship.” In Democracy and the Claims of Nature, edited by B. A. Minteer and B. P. Taylor, 153–72. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
  28. Light, A. 2008. “Restorative Relationships: From Artifacts to ‘Natural’ Systems.” In Healing Natures, Repairing Relationships: New Perspectives on Restoring Ecological Species and Consciousness, edited by R. L. France, 95–115. Sheffield, VT: Green Frigate Books.Google Scholar
  29. Luzar, E. J., and A. Diagne. 1999. “Participation in the Next Generation of Agriculture Conservation Programs: The Role of Environmental Attitudes.” Journal of Socio-Economics 28 (3): 335–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Manfredo, M. J., T. L. Teel, and A. D. Bright. 2004. “Applications of the Concept of Values and Attitudes in Human Dimensions of Natural Resources Research.” In Society and Natural Resources: A Summary of Knowledge, edited by M. J. Manfredo, J. J. Vaske, B. L. Bruyere, D. R. Field, and P. Brown, 271–82. Jefferson, MO: Modern Litho.Google Scholar
  31. McFarlane, B. L., and P. C. Boxall. 2003. “The Role of Social Psychological and Social Structural Variables in Environmental Activism: An Example of the Forest Sector.” Journal of Environmental Psychology 23 (2003): 79–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. McKinsey and Company. 2001. “Effective Capacity Building in Nonprofit Organizations.” Unpublished report prepared for Venture Philanthropy Partners, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  33. Merriam-Webster. 1998. Merriam-Webster’s Collegiate Dictionary. 10th ed. Springfield, MA: Merriam-Webster.Google Scholar
  34. Miles, I., W. C. Sullivan, and F. E. Kuo. 2000. “Psychological Benefits of Volunteering for Restoration Projects.” Ecological Restoration 18 (4): 218–27.Google Scholar
  35. Millar, H. 2003. “Successful Stewardship and Conservation Organizations: Case Studies and Best Practices.” Unpublished report prepared for the Land Trust Alliance of British Columbia, Salt Spring Island, British Columbia, Canada.Google Scholar
  36. Monroe, M. C. 2003. “Two Avenues for Encouraging Conservation Behaviors.” Human Ecology Review 10 (2): 113–25.Google Scholar
  37. Park, H. S., T. R. Levine, and W. F. Sharkey. 1998. “The Theory of Reasoned Action and Self-Construals: Understanding Recycling in Hawaii.” Communication Studies 49 (3): 196–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Ryan, R. L., R. Kaplan, and R. E. Grese. 2001. “Predicting Volunteer Commitment in Environmental Stewardship Programmes.” Journal of Environmental Planning and Management 44 (5): 629–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Salant, P., and D. A. Dillman. 1994. How to Conduct Your Own Survey. New York: John Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar
  40. Schroeder, H. W. 2000. “The Restoration Experience: Volunteers’ Motives, Values, and Concepts of Nature.” In Restoring Nature: Perspectives from the Social Sciences and Humanities, edited by P. H. Gobster and R. B. Hull, 247–64.Washington, DC: Island Press.Google Scholar
  41. Scott, D. 1994. “The Problematic Nature of Participation in Contract Bridge: A Qualitative Study of Group-Related Constraints.” Leisure Sciences 13: 321–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Shindler, B., P. List, and B. S. Steel. 1993. “Managing Federal Forests: Public Attutides in Oregon and Nationwide.” Journal of Forestry (July): 36–42.Google Scholar
  43. Stutzman, T. M., and S. B. Green. 1982. “Factors Affecting Energy Consumption: Two Field Tests of the Fishbein-Ajzen Model.” Journal of Social Psychology 117: 183–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Trumbo, C. W., and G. J. O’Keefe. 2005. “Intention to Conserve Water: Environmental Values, Reasoned Action, and Information Effects Across Time.” Society and Natural Resources 18: 573–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Van Liere, K. D., and R. E. Dunlap. 1980. “The Social Basis of Environmental Concern: A Review of Hypotheses, Explanations, and Empirical Evidence.” Public Opinion Quarterly 44: 181–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Vaske, J. J., and M. P. Donnelly. 1999. “A Value-Attitude-Behavior Model Predicting Wildland Preservation Voting Intentions.” Society and Natural Resources 12: 523–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Vaske, J. J., M. P. Donnelly, D. R. Williams, and S. Jonker. 2001. “Demographic Influences on Environmental Value Orientations and Normative Beliefs about National Forest Management.” Society and Natural Resources 14 (9): 761–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Westphal, L., and G. Childs. 1994. “Overcoming Obstacles: Creating Volunteer Partnerships.” Journal of Forestry 10: 28–32.Google Scholar
  49. Whittaker, D., J. J. Vaske, and M. J. Manfredo. 2006. “Specificity and Cognitive Hierarchy: Value Orientations and the Acceptability of Urban Wildlife Management Actions.” Society and Natural Resources 19: 515–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Island Press 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Northern Arizona UniversityFlagstaffUSA

Personalised recommendations