Skip to main content

Resource Policy, Adaptive Management, and Energy Development on Public Lands

  • Chapter
Energy Development and Wildlife Conservation in Western North America
  • 878 Accesses

Abstract

The challenge associated with integrating energy development and wildlife conservation on public lands is formidable. These pressures will continue, especially in the face of global climate change. Natural gas is viewed as an important bridge fuel to more renewable sources of energy (Roberts 2004). In addition to impacts associated with traditional oil and gas development, a host of new energy-related projects are emerging. Uranium mining is booming once again, and there are increasing pressures to develop energy transmission corridors, locate carbon capture and sequestration projects, and develop wind and solar facilities on public lands (U.S. Department of the Interior 2009a).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Beierle, T. C., and R. J. Long. 1999. Chilling collaboration: The Federal Advisory Committee Act and stakeholder involvement in environmental decisionmak-ing. Environmental Law Reporter 39:10406–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benson, M. H. 2009. Integrating adaptive management and oil and gas development: Existing obstacles and opportunities for reform. Environmental Law Reporter 39:10962–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caldwell, L. K., ed. 2002. The National Environmental Policy Act: Judicial misconstruction, legislative indifference, and executive neglect. College Station: Texas A & M University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeLuca, T. H., G. H. Aplet, and B. Wilmer. 2008. The unknown trajectory of forest restoration: A call for ecosystem monitoring. Washington, DC: The Wilderness Society.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doremus, H. 2001. Adaptive management, the Endangered Species Act, and the institutional challenges of “New Age” environmental protection. Washburn Law Journal 41:50–89.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dreher, R. G. 2005. NEPA under siege: The political assault on the National Environmental Policy Act. Washington, DC: Georgetown Environmental Law and Policy Institute, Georgetown University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischman, R. L. 2007. From words to action: The impact and legal status of the 2006 National Refuge System Management Policies. Stanford Environmental Law Journal 26:118–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haugrud, K. J. 2009. Perspectives on NEPA: Let’s bring a bit of substance to NEPA-making mitigation mandatory. Environmental Law Reporter 39:10638– 9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holling, C. S., ed. 1978. Adaptive environmental assessment and management. New York: Wiley and Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karkkainen, B. C. 2002. Toward a smarter NEPA: Monitoring and managing government’s environmental performance. Columbia Law Review 102:903–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, K. N. 1993. Compass and gyroscope: Integrating science and politics for the environment. Washington, DC: Island Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mandelker, D. 2009. Thoughts on NEPA at 40. Environmental Law Reporter 39:10640–1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Margoluis, R. A., N. Salafsky, and A. Balla. 1998. Measures of success: Designing, managing, and monitoring conservation and development projects. Washington, DC: Island Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ——. 2003. Cumulative environmental effects of oil and gas activities on Alaska’s north slope. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ——. 2008. The underappreciated role of regulatory enforcement in natural resource conservation. Policy Sciences 41:139–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rittel, H. W. J., and M. M. Webber. 1973. Dilemmas in a general theory of planning. Policy Sciences 4:155–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, P. D. 2004. The end of oil: On the edge of a perilous new world. New York: Houghton Mifflin.

    Google Scholar 

  • 2005. The disconnect between environmental assessment and adaptive management. Trends 36:6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sansonetti, T. L., and W. R. Murray. 1990. A primer on the Federal Onshore Oil and Gas Leasing Reform Act of 1987 and its regulations. Land and Water Law Review 25:375–416.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thrower, J. 2006. Adaptive management and NEPA: How a non-equilibrium view of ecosystems mandates flexible regulation. Ecology Law Quarterly 3:871–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Institute for Environmental Conflict Resolution. 2005. National Environmental Conflict Resolution Advisory Committee final report. Tucson, AZ: Morris K. Udall Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walters, C. J., and C. S. Holling. 1990. Large-scale management experiments and learning by doing. Ecology 71:2060–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, B. K., R. C. Szaro, and C. D. Shapiro. 2009. Adaptive management: The U.S. Department of the Interior Technical Guide. Washington, DC: Adaptive Management Working Group, U.S. Department of the Interior.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

David E. Naugle

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Island Press

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Benson, M.H. (2011). Resource Policy, Adaptive Management, and Energy Development on Public Lands. In: Naugle, D.E. (eds) Energy Development and Wildlife Conservation in Western North America. Island Press, Washington, DC. https://doi.org/10.5822/978-1-61091-022-4_11

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Societies and partnerships