Advertisement

Eastern Old-Growth Forests under Threat: Changing Dynamics due to Invasive Organisms

  • John S. Gunn
  • David A. Orwig
Chapter

Abstract

One of the most serious threats facing forests in North America is the introduction of plants, pests, and pathogens from other countries (Dukes et al. 2009). This chapter will discuss the mechanisms and impacts of the invasion of these organisms into old forest stands and summarize the stand and landscape factors that make old-growth forests susceptible to these threats. Due to increases in the global movement of products around the world, introductions of plants, pests, and pathogens are increasing and can significantly alter the structure, composition, function, and aesthetics of forests and the habitat they provide (Lovett et al. 2016). Many introduced species pose little or no threat to forested ecosystems, but there is a growing number of species that have already caused serious damage or pose serious threats to our old-growth forests (tables 12-1 and 12-2). While we recognize that native pests and pathogens also exist and can negatively impact forests, we focus here on introduced species that will or could directly impact eastern old-growth forests and the common tree species found therein.

References

  1. Allen, J. M., T. J. Leininger, J. D. Hurd, D. L. Civco, A. E. Gelfand, and J. A. Silander. 2013. “Socioeconomics drive woody invasive plant richness in New England, USA through forest fragmentation” Landscape Ecology28: 1671–1686. doi:10.1007/s10980-013-9916-7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Barlow, K. M., D. A. Mortensen, P. J. Drohan, and K. M. Averill. 2017. “Unconventional gas development facilitates plant invasions” Journal of Environmental Management202: 208–216. doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2017.07.005.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Burnham, K. M., and T. D. Lee. 2010. “Canopy gaps facilitate establishment, growth, and reproduction of invasive Frangula alnus in a Tsuga canadensis dominated forest” Biological Invasions12: 1509–1520. doi:10.1007/s10530-009-9563-8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cale, J. A., S. A. Teale, M. T. Johnston, G. L. Boyer, K. A. Perri, and J. D. Castello. 2015. “New ecological and physiological dimensions of beech bark disease development in aftermath forests” Forest Ecology and Management336: 99–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Chapman, J. I., A. L. Myers, A. J. Burky, and R. W. McEwan. 2015. “Edge effects, invasion, and the spatial pattern of herb-layer biodiversity in an old-growth deciduous forest fragment” Natural Areas Journal35: 439–451. doi:10.3375/043.035.0307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Dale, V. H., L. A. Joyce, S. Mcnulty, R. P. Neilson, M. P. Ayres, M. D. Flannigan, P. J. Hanson, et al. 2001. “Climate change and forest disturbances.” BioScience51. doi:10.1641/0006-3568(2001)051[0723:CCAFD]2.0.CO;2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Davis, M. A., J. P. Grime, and K. E. N. Thompson. 2000. “Fluctuating resources in plant communities : a general theory of invasibility” Journal of Ecology88: 528–534.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Davis, M. B., ed. 1996. Eastern Old-Growth Forests: Prospects for Rediscovery and Recovery. Washington, DC: Island Press.Google Scholar
  9. DeSantis, R. D., W. K. Moser, D. D. Gormanson, M. G. Bartlett, and B. Vermunt. 2013. “Effects of climate on emerald ash borer mortality and the potential for ash survival in North America.” Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 178–179: 120–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Dodds, K. J., and D. A. Orwig. 2011. “An invasive urban forest pest invades natural environments—Asian longhorned beetle in northeastern US hardwood forests.” Canadian Journal of Forest Research 41: 1729–1742.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Dukes, J. S., J. Pontius, D. Orwig, J. R. Garnas, V. L. Rodgers, N. Brazee, B. Cooke, et al. 2009. “Responses of insect pests, pathogens, and invasive plant species to climate change in the forests of northeastern North America: what can we predict? Canadian Journal of Forest Research39: 231–248. doi:10.1139/X08-171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Ellison, A. M., M. S. Bank, B. D. Clinton, E. A. Colburn, K. Elliott, C. R. Ford, D. R. Foster, et al. 2005. “Loss of foundation species: consequences for the structure and dynamics of forested ecosystems” Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment3: 479–486.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Eyre, D., and R. A. Haack, 2017. “Invasive cerambycid pests and biosecurity measures.” In Cerambycidae of the World: Biology and Pest Management, edited by Q. Wang, 563–607. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.Google Scholar
  14. Flory, S. L. 2010. “Non-native grass invasion suppresses forest succession” Oecologia164: 1029–1038. doi:10.1007/s00442-010-1697-y.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Flory, S. L., and K. Clay. 2006. “Invasive shrub distribution varies with distance to roads and stand age in eastern deciduous forests in Indiana, USA” Plant Ecology184: 131–141. doi:10.1007/s11258-005-9057-4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Forrester, J. A., G. G. McGee, and M. J. Mitchell. 2003. “Effects of beech bark disease on aboveground biomass and species composition in a mature northern hardwood forest, 1985 to 2000” The Journal of the Torrey Botanical Society130: 70–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Frappier, B., T. D. Lee, K. F. Olson, and R. T. Eckert. 2003. “Small-scale invasion pattern, spread rate, and lag-phase behavior of Rhamnus Frangula L” Forest Ecology and Management186: 1–6. doi:10.1016/S0378-1127(03)00274-3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Garnas, J. R., M. P. Ayres, A. M. Liebhold, and C. Evans. 2011. “Subcontinental impacts of an invasive tree disease on forest structure and dynamics” Journal of Ecology99: 532–541.Google Scholar
  19. Gonzales, E. K., and S. E. Gergel. 2007. “Testing assumptions of cost surface analysis—a tool for invasive species management” Landscape Ecology22: 1155–1168. doi:10.1007/s10980-007-9106-6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Griffin, J. M., G. M. Lovett, M. A. Arthur, and K. C. Weathers. 2003. “The distribution and severity of beech bark disease in the Catskill Mountains, N.Y” Canadian Journal of Forest Research33: 1754–1760.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Gunn, J. S., M. J. Ducey, and A. A. Whitman. 2014. “Late-successional and old-growth forest carbon temporal dynamics in the northern forest (northeastern USA)” Forest Ecology and Management312: 40–46. doi:10.1016/j.foreco.2013.10.023.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Houston, D. 1994. “Major new tree disease epidemics: beech bark disease” Annual Review of Phytopathology32: 75–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Ibáñez, I., J. A. Silander, J. M. Allen, S. A. Treanor, and A. Wilson. 2009. “Identifying hotspots for plant invasions and forecasting focal points of further spread” Journal of Applied Ecology46: 1219–1228. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2664.2009.01736.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Johnson, V. S., J. A. Litvaitis, T. D. Lee, and S. D. Frey. 2006. “The role of spatial and temporal scale in colonization and spread of invasive shrubs in early successional habitats” Forest Ecology and Management228: 124–134. doi:10.1016/j.foreco.2006.02.033.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Knight, K. S., J. P. Brown, and R. P. Long. 2013. “Factors affecting the survival of ash (Fraxinus Spp.) trees infested by emerald ash borer (Agrilus planipennis)” Biological Invasions15: 371–383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Kurtz, C.M., and M. H. Hansen. 2013. “An assessment of multiflora rose in northern U.S. Forests.” Vol. Res. Note NRS-182. https://www.fs.fed.us/nrs/pubs/rn/rn_nrs182.pdf.
  27. Lee, T., S. Eisenhaure, and I. Gaudreau. 2016. “Pre-logging treatment of invasive glossy buckthorn (Frangula alnus Mill.) promotes regeneration of eastern white pine (Pinus strobus L.).” Forests 8: 16. doi:10.3390/f8010016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Leicht, S. A. 2005. “The comparative ecology of an invasive bittersweet species (Celastrus orbiculatus) and its native congener (C. scandens).” PhD diss.. Storrs, CT: University of Connecticut. http://digitalcommons.uconn.edu/dissertations/AAI3193727.Google Scholar
  29. Leicht, S. A., and J. A Silander. 2006. “Differential responses of invasive Celastrus orbiculatus (Celastraceae) and native C. scandens to changes in light quality” American Journal of Botany93: 972–977. doi:10.3732/ajb.93.7.972.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Leppanen, C., and D. Simberloff. 2016. “Implications of early production in an invasive forest pest” Agricultural and Forest Entomology19: 217–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Liebhold, A. M., D. G. McCullough, L. M. Blackburn, S. J. Frankel, B. Von Holle, and J. E. Aukema. 2013. “A highly aggregated geographical distribution of forest pest invasions in the USA” Diversity and Distributions19: 1208–1216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Liendo, D., I. Biurrun, J. A. Campos, M. Herrera, J. Loidi, and I. García-Mijangos. 2015. “Invasion patterns in riparian habitats: the role of anthropogenic pressure in temperate streams” Plant Biosystems149: 289–297. doi:10.1080/11263504.2013.822434.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Lodge, D. M. 1993. “Biological invasions: lessons for ecology” Trends in Ecology and Evolution8: 133–137. doi:10.1016/0169-5347(93)90025-K.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Lorimer, C. G. 1980. “Age structure and disturbance history of a southern Appalachian virgin forest.” Ecology61: 1169–1184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Lovett, G. M., C. D. Canham, M. A. Arthur, K. C. Weathers, and R. D. Fitzhugh. 2006. “Forest ecosystem responses to exotic pests and pathogens in eastern North America” Bioscience56: 395–405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Lovett, G. M., M. Weiss, A. M. Liebhold, T. P. Holmes, B. Leung, K. F. Lambert, D. A. Orwig, et al. 2016. “Nonnative forest insects and pathogens in the United States: impacts and policy options” Ecological Applications26: 1437–1455.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Martin, P. H., C. D. Canham, and P. L. Marks. 2009. “Why forests appear resistant to exotic plant invasions: intention introductions, stand dynamics and the role of shade tolerance” Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment7: 142–148. doi:10.1890/070096.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. McCarthy, B. C., C. J. Small, and D. L. Rubino. 2001. “Composition, structure and dynamics of Dysart Woods, an old-growth mixed mesophytic forest of southeastern Ohio” Forest Ecology and Management140: 193–213. doi:10.1016/S0378-1127(00)00280-2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. McClure, M. S. 1987. “Biology and control of hemlock wooly adelgid.” Bulletin 851. New Haven, CT: The Connecticut Agricultural Experiment Station.Google Scholar
  40. McClure, M. S. 1990. “Role of wind, birds, deer, and humans in the dispersal of hemlock woolly adelgid (Homoptera: Adelgidae)” Environmental Entomology19: 36–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. McDonald, R. I., G. Motzkin, and D. R. Foster. 2008. “Assessing the influence of historical factors, contemporary processes, and environmental conditions on the distribution of invasive species.” Journal of the Torrey Botanical Society 135: 260–271. doi 10.3159/08-Ra-012.1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Merow, C., S. T. Bois, J. M. Allen, Y. Xie, and J. A. Silander. 2017. “Climate change both facilitates and inhibits invasive plant ranges in New England” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America114: E3276–284. doi:10.1073/pnas.1609633114.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  43. Oliver, C. D., and B. C. Larson. 1996. Forest Stand Dynamics. Updated Edition. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  44. Orwig, D. A., A. A. B. Plotkin, E. A. Davidson, H. Lux, K. E. Savage, and A. M. Ellison. 2013. “Foundation species loss affects vegetation structure more than ecosystem function in a northeastern USA Forest.” PeerJ1: e41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Orwig, D. A., J. R. Thompson, N. A. Povak, M. Manner, D. Niebyl, and D. R. Foster. 2012. “A foundation tree at the precipice: Tsuga canadensis health after the arrival of Adelges tsugae in central New England.” Ecosphere 3: art10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Parendes, L. A., and J. A. Jones. 2000. “Role of light availability and dispersal in exotic plant invasion along roads and streams in the H. J. Andrews Experimental Forest, Oregon” Conservation Biology14: 64–75. doi:10.1046/j.1523-1739.2000.99089.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Poland, T. M., and D. G. McCullough. 2006. “Emerald ash borer: invasion of the urban forest and the threat to North America’s ash resource.” Journal of Forestry 104: 118–124.Google Scholar
  48. Prati, D., and O. Bossdorf. 2004. “Allelopathic inhibition of germination by Alliaria petiolata (Brassicaceae).” American Journal of Botany 91: 285–288. doi:10.3732/ajb.91.2.285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Rodewald, A. D., and P. Arcese. 2016. “Direct and indirect interactions between landscape structure and invasive or overabundant species.” Current Landscape Ecology Reports. doi:10.1007/s40823-016-0004-y.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Schulz, B. K., and A. N. Gray. 2013. “The new flora of northeastern USA: quantifying introduced plant species occupancy in forest ecosystems” Environmental Monitoring and Assessment185: 3931–3957. doi:10.1007/s10661-012-2841-4.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. Skinner, M., B. L. Parker, S. Gouli, and T. Ashikaga. 2003. “Regional responses of hemlock woolly adelgid (Homoptera: Adelgidae) to low temperatures” Environmental Entomology32: 523–528.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Smith, M. T., J. J. Turgeon, P. De Groot, and B. Gasman. 2009. “Asian longhorned beetle Anoplophora glabripennis (Motschulsky): lessons learned and opportunites to improve the process of eradication and management.” American Entomologist 55: 21–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Snyder, C. D., J. A. Young, D. P. Lemarié, and D. R. Smith. 2002. “Influence of eastern hemlock (Tsuga canadensis) forests on aquatic invertebrate assemblages in headwater streams.” Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 59: 262–275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Stotz, G. C., G. J. Pec, and J. F. Cahill. 2016. “Is biotic resistance to invaders dependent upon local environmental conditions or primary productivity? a meta-analysis” Basic and Applied Ecology17: 377–837. doi:10.1016/j.baae.2016.04.001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Tingley, M. W., D. A. Orwig, R. Field, and G. Motzkin. 2002. “Avian response to removal of a forest dominant: consequences of hemlock woolly adelgid infestations.” Journal of Biogeography 29: 1505–1516.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Vilà, M., J. L. Espinar, M. Hejda, P. E. Hulme, V. Jarošík, J. L. Maron, J. Pergl, U. Schaffner, Y. Sun, and P. Pyšek. 2011. “Ecological impacts of invasive alien plants: a meta-analysis of their effects on species, communities and ccosystems” Ecology Letters14: 702–708. doi:10.1111/j.1461-0248.2011.01628.x.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. Wagner, D. L., K. J. Metzler, S. A. Leicht-Young, and G. Motzkin. 2014. “Vegetation composition along a New England transmission line corridor and its implications for other trophic levels” Forest Ecology and Management327: 231–239. doi:10.1016/j.foreco.2014.04.026.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Ward, J. S., M. E. Montgomery, C. A. S-J. Cheah, B. P. Onken, and R. S. Cowles. 2004. “Eastern hemlock forests: guidelines to minimize the impacts of hemlock woolly adelgid.” Technical Bulletin NA-TP-03-04. Northeastern Area State & Private Forestry. Morgantown, WV: USDA Forest Service.Google Scholar
  59. Watkins, R. Z., J. Chen, J. Pickens, and K. D. Brosofske. 2003. “Effects of forest roads on understory plants in a managed hardwood landscape” Conservation Biology17: 411–419. doi:10.1046/j.1523-1739.2003.01285.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Andrew M. Barton and William S. Keeton 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • John S. Gunn
  • David A. Orwig

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations