Skip to main content

The Emergence of Watershed and Forest Collaboratives

  • Chapter
People, Forests, and Change

Abstract

Recent decades have seen the emergence of collaborative organizations for forest governance in landscape-scale management. A collaborative is defined as an organized collection of landowners, stakeholders, resource agencies, tribes, or other organizations that come together to address common issues and resolve problems through deliberation, consensus building, and cooperative learning (Goldstein and Butler 2010). Collaboratives are designed to be transparent, diverse, and inclusive (Wondolleck and Yaffee 2003). Although some collaboratives are community driven or place based, with the goal of protecting local interests or access, others are sparked by land managers who seek integrated solutions to multiple interests and objectives.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Literature Cited

  • Asah, S. T., D. N. Bengston, K. Wendt, and K. C. Nelson. 2012a. Diagnostic reframing of intractable environmental problems: Case of a contested public land-use conflict. Journal of Environmental Management 108:108–119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Asah, S. T., D. N. Bengston, K. Wendt, and L. DeVaney. 2012b. Prognostic framing of stakeholders’ subjectivities: A case of all-terrain vehicle management on state public lands. Environmental Management 49:192–206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bergman, W. J., R. R. Bliss, C. A. Johnson, and G. G. Kaufman. 2004. Netting, financial contracts, and banks: The economic implications. Working Paper No. 2004-02. Chicago: Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berkes, F. 2009. Evolution of co-management: Role of knowledge generation, bridging organizations and social learning. Journal of Environmental Management 90:1692–1702.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Conley, A., and M. A. Moote. 2003. Evaluating collaborative natural resource management. Society & Natural Resources 16:371–386.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis, E. J., L. K. Cerveny, M. Nuss, and D. Seesholtz. 2015. Oregon’s forest collaboratives: A rapid assessment. Oregon State University Scholar’s Archive. http://ir.library.oregonstate.edu/xmlui/handle/1957/55791.

    Google Scholar 

  • FEMAT (Forest Ecosystem Management Assessment Team). 1993. Forest ecosystem management: An ecological, economic, and social assessment. Report of the Forest Ecosystem Management Assessment Team. Portland, OR: US Department of Agriculture; US Department of the Interior [and others].

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischer, A. P., and S. Charnley. 2012. Risk and cooperation: Managing hazardous fuel in mixed ownership landscapes. Environmental Management 49: 1192–1207.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fischer, A. P., K. Vance-Borland, L. Jasny, K. E. Grimm and S. Charnley. 2016. A network approach to assessing social capacity for landscape planning: The case of fire-prone forests in Oregon, USA. Landscape and Urban Planning 147:18–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flitcroft, R. L., D. C. Dedrick, C. L. Smith, C. A. Thieman, and J. P. Bolte. 2009. Social infrastructure to integrate science and practice: The experience of the Long Tom Watershed Council. Ecology and Society 14(2):36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldstein, B. E., and W. H. Butler. 2010. Expanding the scope and impact of collaborative planning: Combining multi-stakeholder collaboration and communities of practice in a learning network. Journal of the American Planning Association 76:238–249.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kershner, J. L., and B. B. Roper. 2010. An evaluation of management objectives used to assess stream habitat conditions on federal lands within the Interior Columbia Basin. Fisheries 35:269–278.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lauber, T. B., D. J. Decker, and B. A. Knuth. 2008. Social networks and community-based natural resource management. Environmental Management 42:677–687.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McDermott, M. H., M. A. Moote, and C. Danks. 2011. Effective collaboration. Pp. 81–111 in Community-based collaboration: Bridging socio-ecological research and practice. Edited by E. F. Dukes, K. E. Firehock, and J. E. Birkhoff. Charlottesville and London: University of Virginia Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McLain, R., K. Wright, and L. K. Cerveny. 2014. Who is at the forest restoration table? Final report on the Blue Mountains Forest Stewardship Network, Phase I. Portland, OR: Portland State University. https://www.pdx.edu/sustainability/sites/www.pdx.edu.sustainability/files/BluesReport_online.pdf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oregon Solutions. 2013. Oregon forest collaboratives statewide inventory. http://orsolutions.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/08/OFCSI_Draft_February_20131.pdf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reed, M. G., and S. Bruyneel. 2010. Rescaling environmental governance, rethinking the state: A three-dimensional review. Progress in Human Geography 35: 646–653.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • USDA (US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service). 2012. National Forest System land management planning. Final rule and record of decision. 36 CFR Part 219. Federal Register 77:21162–21267. http://www.fs.usda.gov/Internet/FSE_DOCUMENTS/stelprdb5362536.pdf.

    Google Scholar 

  • USDA (US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service). 2016. Eastside restoration. http://www.fs.usda.gov/detail/r6/landmanagement/resourcemanagement/?cid=stelprdb5423597.

    Google Scholar 

  • USDA and USDI (US Department of Agriculture and US Department of the Interior). 1994. Record of decision for amendments to Forest Service and Bureau of Land Management planning documents within the range of the northern spotted owl [plus Attachment A: Standards and Guides]. [Place of publication unknown]: US Department of Agriculture and US Department of the Interior. http://www.reo.gov/library/reports/newroda.pdf.

  • USDA and USDI (US Department of Agriculture and US Department of the Interior). 2015. 20 year reports for the Northwest Forest Plan. Interagency Regional Monitoring Program. http://www.reo.gov/monitoring/reports/20yr-report/.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wondolleck, J. M., and S. L. Yaffee. 2003. Collaborative ecosystem planning processes in the United States: Evolution and challenges. Environments 31(2):59.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Island Press

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Flitcroft, R.L., Cerveny, L.K., Bormann, B.T., Smith, J.E., Asah, S.T., Fischer, A.P. (2017). The Emergence of Watershed and Forest Collaboratives. In: Olson, D.H., Van Horne, B. (eds) People, Forests, and Change. Island Press, Washington, DC. https://doi.org/10.5822/978-1-61091-768-1_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics