Advertisement

Climate Choices for a Sustainable Southwest

  • Diana Liverman
  • Susanne C. Moser
  • Paul S. Weiland
  • Lisa Dilling
  • Maxwell T. Boykoff
  • Heidi E. Brown
  • Eric S. Gordon
  • Christina Greene
  • Eric Holthaus
  • Deb A. Niemeier
  • Stephanie Pincetl
  • W. James Steenburgh
  • Vincent C. Tidwell
  • Jennifer Hoffman
Part of the NCA Regional Input Reports book series (NCARIR)

Abstract

This chapter provides an integrated overview of solutions and choices for responding to climate change in ways that reduce risks and support sustainable development in the Southwest. The goal is to illustrate the range of choices for responding to climate change, along with some of the relevant trade-offs and opportunities, to inform policy options and decisions. In the context of climate change, risk reduction includes: reducing global GHG emissions to limit global changes; limiting activities locally or regionally (e.g. land use choices) that increase unwanted local or regional climatic changes; taking action now to accommodate and adapt to climate changes to date; and increasing capacity to respond effectively and adapt to future changes.

Keywords

Emission Reduction Adaptation Planning Renewable Portfolio Standard Stakeholder Engagement Process Energy Star Program 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Amundsen, H., F. Berglund, and H. Westskog. 2010. Overcoming barriers to climate change adaptation - a question of multilevel governance? Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy 28:276–289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Archie, K. M., L. Dilling, J. B. Milford, and F. C. Pampel. 2012. Climate Change and Western Public Lands: a Survey of U.S. Federal Land Managers on the Status of Adaptation Efforts. Ecology and Society 17 (4):C7-20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Averyt, K., J. Fisher, A. Huber-Lee, A. Lewis, J. Macknick, N. Madden, J. Rogers, and S. Tellinghuisen. 2011. Freshwater use by U.S. power plants: Electricity’s thirst for a precious resource. A report of the Energy and Water in a Warming World Initiative. Cambridge, MA: Union of Concerned Scientists.Google Scholar
  4. Barsugli, J., C. Anderson, J. B. Smith, and J. M. Vogel. 2009. Options for improving climate modeling to assist water utility planning for climate change. N.p.: Water Utility Climate Alliance.Google Scholar
  5. Berck, P. and L. Xie. 2011. A policy model for climate change in California. Journal of Natural Resources Policy Research 3:37–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Biesbroek, G. R., R. J. Swart, and W. G. M. van der Knaap. 2009. The mitigation-adaptation dichotomy and the role of spatial planning. Habitat International 33:230–237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Blate, G. M., L. A. Joyce, J. S. Littell, S. G. McNulty, C. I. Millar, S. C. Moser, R. P. Neilson, et al. 2009. Adapting to climate change in United States national forests. Unasylva 60:57–62.Google Scholar
  8. Boden, T., G. Marland, and B. Andres. 2011. Global CO2 emissions from fossil-fuel burning, cement manufacture, and gas flaring: 1751–2008. Oak Ridge, TN: Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Carbon Dioxide Information Analysis Center. http://cdiac.ornl.gov/ftp/ndp030/global.1751_2008.ems.Google Scholar
  9. Borel, V. 2009. Rain gardens. N.p.: California Sea Grant Extension / University of California Cooperative Extension. Green Sheet Series No. 3. http://www-csgc.ucsd.edu/BOOKSTORE/Resources/GS3%20Rain%20Gardens_8-10-09.pdf.Google Scholar
  10. Burch, S. 2010. Transforming barriers into enablers of action on climate change: Insights from three municipal case studies in British Columbia, Canada. Global Environmental Change 20:287–297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Caldeira, K., and D. W. Keith. 2010. The need for climate engineering research. Issues in Science and Technology 27:57–62.Google Scholar
  12. Carpe Diem West. 2011. Watershed investment programs in the American West. An updated look: Linking upstream watershed health and downstream security. Sausalito, CA: Carpe Diem West.Google Scholar
  13. Center for Climate and Energy Solutions. 2012. State adaptation plans. http://www.c2es.org/us-states-regions/policy-maps/adaptation.Google Scholar
  14. Chen, F., S. Miao, M. Tewari, J-W. Bao, and H. Kusaka. 2011. A numerical study of interactions between surface forcing and sea-breeze circulations and their effects on stagnation in the greater Houston area. Journal of Geophysical Research 116: D12105, doi:  10.1029/2010JD015533.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Chou, B. 2012. Ready or not: An evaluation of state climate and water preparedness planning. NRDC Issue Brief IB:12-03-A. Washington, DC: Natural Resources Defense Council.Google Scholar
  16. Clawson, M. 1983. The federal lands revisited. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  17. DeLaune, R. D., and J. R. White. 2011. Will coastal wetlands continue to sequester carbon in response to an increase in global sea level? A case study of the rapidly subsiding Mississippi river deltaic plain. Climatic Change 110:297–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Dilling, L. 2012. Climate adaptation barriers and opportunities in the United States: A focus on policy and decision making at the sub-national scale. Poster presented at Planet Under Pressure International Conference, London, United Kingdom, March 26–29, 2012. http://sciencepolicy.colorado.edu/news/announcements/2011-2012/dilling_pup_poster.pdf.Google Scholar
  19. Ekstrom, J. A., S. C. Moser, and M. Torn. 2011. Barriers to climate change adaptation: A diagnostic framework. Public Interest Energy Research (PIER) Program final project report CED-500-2011-004. Sacramento: California Energy Commission. http://www.energy.ca.gov/2011publications/CEC-500-2011-004/CEC-500-2011-004.pdf.Google Scholar
  20. Energy Star Program. N.d. Utah building energy efficiency strategies. http://www.energystar.gov/index.cfm?fuseaction=pt_awards.showAwardDetails&esa_id=4104 (accessed June 14, 2012).
  21. Engel, D., and D. M. Kammen. 2009. Green jobs and the clean energy economy. Copenhagen Climate Council, Thought Leadership Series No. 4. Copenhagen: Copenhagen Climate Council. Also available at: http://www.climatechange.ca.gov/eaac/documents/member_materials/Engel_and_Kammen_Green_Jobs_and_the_Clean_Energy_Economy.pdf.Google Scholar
  22. Farr, D. 2007. Sustainable urbanism: Urban design with nature. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  23. Fthenakis, V., J. E. Mason, and K. Zweibel. 2009. The technical, geographical, and economic feasibility for solar energy to supply the energy needs of the U.S. Energy Policy 37:387–399.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Franco, G., D. Cayan, A. Luers, M. Hanemann, and B. Croes. 2008. Linking climate change science with policy in California. Climatic Change 87 (Suppl. 1): S7-S20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Friedlingstein, P., R. A. Houghton, G. Marland, J. Hackler, T. A. Boden, T. J. Conway, J. G. Canadell, M. R. Raupach, P. Ciais, and C. Le Quéré. 2010. Update on CO2 emissions. Nature Geoscience 3:811–812.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Garde, A. M. 2004. New urbanism as sustainable growth? Journal of Planning Education and Research 24:154–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Garnaut, R. 2008. The Garnaut climate change review: Final report. Melbourne: Cambridge University Press. http://www.garnautreview.org.au/2008-review.html.Google Scholar
  28. Georgetown Law Center. N.d. State and local adaptation plans. http://www.georgetownclimate.org/adaptation/state-and-local-plans (accessed 1 October 2012).
  29. Gelman, R. S. 2010. 2010 Renewable energy data book. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Energy.Google Scholar
  30. Glenn, E. P., C. Lee, R. Felger, and S. Zengel. 1996. Effects of water management on the wetlands of the Colorado River Delta, Mexico. Conservation Biology 10:1175–1186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Gifford, R., C. Kormos, and A. McIntyre. 2011. Behavioral dimensions of climate change: Drivers, responses, barriers, and interventions. WIREs Climate Change 2:801–827.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Giridharan, R., S. S. Y. Lau, S. Ganesan, and B. Givoni. 2007. Urban design factors influencing heat island intensity in high-rise high-density environments of Hong Kong. Building and Environment 42:3669–3684.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Hardt, S. W. 1994. Federal land management in the twenty-first century: From wise use to wise stewardship. Harvard Environmental Law Review 18:345–403.Google Scholar
  34. Hart, J. F., P. Grifman, S. C. Moser, A. Abeles, M. Meyers, S. Schlosser, and J. A. Ekstrom 2012. Rising to the challenge: Results of the 2011 California coastal adaptation needs assessment. USCSG-TR-01-2012. Los Angeles: University of Southern California, Sea Grant.Google Scholar
  35. Hartman, C. L., E. R. Stafford, and S. Reategui. 2011. Harvesting Utah’s urban winds. Solutions 2 (3). http://www.thesolutionsjournal.com/node/930.
  36. Headwaters Economics. 2010. Clean energy leadership in the Rockies: Competitive positioning in the emerging green economy. Bozeman, MT: Headwaters Economics.Google Scholar
  37. Hundley, N., Jr. 1991. The Great American Desert transformed: Aridity, exploitation, and imperialism in the making of the modern American West. In Water and arid lands of the western United States, ed. M. El-Ahsry and D. Gibbons, 21–84. Cambridge: University of Cambridge Press.Google Scholar
  38. Jantarasami, L. C., J. J. Lawler, and C. W. Thomas. 2010. Institutional barriers to climate change adaptation in U.S. national parks and forests. Ecology and Society 15 (4): article 33. http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol15/iss4/art33.
  39. Jimenez, A., R. Gough, L. Flowers, and R. Taylor. 2009. Wind power across Native America: Opportunities, challenges, and status. Poster presented at Windpower 2009 Conference, May 4–7, 2009, Chicago, IL. http://www.nrel.gov/docs/fy09osti/45411.pdf.Google Scholar
  40. Jones, V. 2009. The green collar economy: How one solution can fix our two biggest problems. San Francisco: HarperOne.Google Scholar
  41. Kammen, D. M., K. Kapadia, and M. Fripp. 2004. Putting renewables to work: How many jobs can the clean energy industry generate? Report of the Renewable and Appropriate Energy Laboratory (RAEL). Berkeley: University of California, RAEL. http://rael.berkeley.edu/old-site/renewables.jobs.2006.pdf.Google Scholar
  42. Karlstrom, S. 2010. Fort Collins, Colorado: 2010 Smarter City - Energy. N.d.: National Resources Defense Council, Smarter Cities Project. http://smartercities.nrdc.org/topic/energy/fort-collins-co-2010-smarter-city-energy.Google Scholar
  43. Kates, R. W., W. R. Travis, and T. J. Wilbanks. 2012. Transformational adaptation when incremental adaptations to climate change are insufficient. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 109(19): 7156–7161, doi:  10.1073/pnas.1115521109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Larson, E. K., N. B. Grimm, P. Gober, and C. L. Redman. 2005. The paradoxical ecology and management of water in the Phoenix, USA metropolitan area. International Journal of Ecohydrology & Hydrobiology 5:287–296.Google Scholar
  45. Lempert, R. J., and D. G. Groves. 2010. Identifying and evaluating robust adaptive policy responses to climate change for water management agencies in the American West. Technology Forecasting and Social Change 77:960–974.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Lindenmayer, D. B., W. Steffen, A. A. Burbidge, L. Hughes, R. L. Kitching, W. Musgrave, M. Stafford Smith, and P. A. Werner. 2010. Conservation strategies in response to rapid climate change: Australia as a case study. Biological Conservation 143:1587–1593.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Lofman, D., M. Petersen, and A. Bower. 2002. Water, energy and environment nexus: The California experience. International Journal of Water Resources Development 18:73–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Loomis, J. 2002. Integrated public lands management. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  49. MacDonald, G. M. 2010. Water, climate change, and sustainability in the Southwest. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 107:21256–21262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. McKinsey & Company (McKinsey). 2007. Reducing US greenhouse gas emissions: How much at what cost? U.S. Greenhouse Gas Abatement Mapping Initiative, Executive Report. http://www.mckinsey.com/Client_Service/Sustainability/Latest_thinking/Reducing_US_greenhouse_gas_emissions.Google Scholar
  51. McMullen, C. P., and J. Jabbour, eds. 2009. Climate change science compendium 2009. N.p.: United Nations Environment Programme.Google Scholar
  52. McNeeley, S. 2012. Examining barriers and opportunities for sustainable adaptation to climate change in Interior Alaska. Climatic Change 111:835–857.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Means, E., M. Laugier, J. Daw, L. Kaatz, and M. Waage. 2010. Decision support planning methods: Incorporating climate change uncertainties into water planning. WUCA White Paper. San Francisco: Water Utility Climate Alliance.Google Scholar
  54. Measham, T., B. Preston, T. Smith, C. Brooke, R. Gorddard, G. Withycombe, and C. Morrison. 2011. Adapting to climate change through local municipal planning: Barriers and challenges. Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change 16:889–909.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Milly, P., J. Betancourt, M. Falkenmark, R. M. Hirsch, Z. W. Kundzewicz, D. P. Lettenmaier, and R. J. Stouffer. 2008. Stationarity is dead: Whither water management? Science 319:573–574.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Moser, S. C. 2012. Adaptation, mitigation, and their disharmonious discontents: An essay. Climatic Change 111:165–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Moser, S. C., and J. A. Ekstrom. 2010. A framework to diagnose barriers to climate change adaptation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 107:22026–22031.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Moser, S. C., and J. A. Ekstrom. 2012. Identifying and overcoming barriers to climate change adaptation in San Francisco Bay: Results from case studies. White Paper CEC-500-2012-034. Sacramento: California Climate Change Center.Google Scholar
  59. Nakićenović, N., and R. Swart, eds. 2000. IPCC Special report on emissions scenarios: A special report of Working Group III of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  60. National Research Council (NRC). 2010a. Adapting to the impacts of climate change. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.Google Scholar
  61. National Research Council (NRC). 2010b. Advancing the science of climate change. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.Google Scholar
  62. National Research Council (NRC). 2010c. Informing an effective response to climate change. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.Google Scholar
  63. National Research Council (NRC). 2010d. Limiting the magnitude of future climate change. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.Google Scholar
  64. Nisbet, M. C. 2009. Communicating climate change: Why frames matter for public engagement. Environment: Science and Policy for Sustainable Development 51:12–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Nobriga, M. L., F. Feyrer, R. D. Baxter, and M. Chotkowski. 2005. Fish community ecology in an altered river delta: Spatial patterns in species composition, life history strategies, and biomass. Estuaries 28:776–785.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Nowak, D. J., D. E. Crane, and J. C. Stevens 2006. Air pollution removal by urban trees and shrubs in the United States. Urban Forestry and Urban Greening 4:115–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. O’Brien, K. 2012. Global environmental change II: From adaptation to deliberate transformation. Progress in Human Geography 36:667–676.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Park, S., N. Marshall, E. Jakku, A. Dowd, S. Howden, E. Mendham, and A. Fleming. 2011. Informing adaptation responses to climate change through theories of transformation. Global Environmental Change 22:115–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Pataki, D. E., R. J. Alig, A. S. Fung, N. E. Golubiewski, C. A. Kennedy, E. G. McPherson, D. J. Nowak, R. V. Pouyat, and P. Romero Lankao. 2006. Urban ecosystems and the North American carbon cycle. Global Change Biology 12:2092–2102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Peters, G. P., G. Marland, C. Le Quéré, T. Boden, J. G. Canadell, and M. R. Raupach. 2011. Rapid growth in CO2 emissions after the 2008–2009 global financial crisis. Nature Climate Change 2:2–4,  doi:10.1038/nclimate1332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Pew Charitable Trusts. 2009. The clean energy economy: Repowering jobs, businesses and investments across America. http://www.pewcenteronthestates.org/uploadedFiles/Clean_Economy_Report_Web.pdf.Google Scholar
  72. Philip Williams and Associates (PWA). 2010. Preliminary study of the effect of sea level rise on the resources of the Hayward shoreline. Report for the Hayward Area Shoreline Planning Agency. PWA REF. 1955.00. San Francisco: PWA.Google Scholar
  73. Post, J. E., and B. W. Altman. 1994. Managing the environmental change process: Barriers and opportunities. Journal of Organizational Change Management 7:64–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Quay, R. 2010. Anticipatory governance: A tool for climate change adaptation. Journal of the American Planning Association 76:496–511.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Resource Media 2009. Water and climate change in the West: Polling and media analysis; March 2009. Carpe Diem—Western Water and Climate Change Project. San Francisco: Resource Media. http://www.carpediemwest.org/sites/carpediemwest.org/files/MediaAnalysis_0.pdf.Google Scholar
  76. Roland-Holst, D. 2008. Energy efficiency, innovation, and job creation in California. Research Papers on Energy, Resources, and Economic Sustainability. Berkeley: University of California, Center for Energy, Resources, and Economic Sustainability (CERES). http://www.next10.org/energy-efficiency-innovation-and-job-creation-california.Google Scholar
  77. Rosenzweig, C., S. Solecki, S. Hammer, and S. Mehrotra. 2010. Cities lead the way in climate-change action. Nature 467:909–911.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Ruhl, J. 2008. Climate change and the Endangered Species Act: Building bridges to the no-analog future. Boston University Law Review 88 (1); Florida State Univ. College of Law, Public Law Research Paper No. 275; FSU College of Law, Law and Economics Paper No. 07–18. http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1014184.
  79. Schultz, T. C., R. L. Shelby, and A. M. Agogino. 2010. Co-design of energy efficient housing with the Pinoleville-Pomo Nation. In Proceedings of the ASME 2010 4th International Conference on Energy Sustainability (ES2010), May 17–22, 2010, Phoenix, Arizona, USA, vol. 2, 925–934. Paper ES2010-90190. http://best.berkeley.edu/~aagogino/papers/ES2010-90190.pdf Google Scholar
  80. Scott, C. A., and M. J. Pasqualetti. 2010. Energy and water resources scarcity: Critical infrastructure for growth and economic development in Arizona and Sonora. Natural Resources Journal 50:645–682.Google Scholar
  81. Smith, J., Vogel, J., Carney, K. and C. Donovan. 2011. Adaptation case studies in the western United States: Intersection of federal and state authority for conserving the greater sage grouse and the Colorado River water supply. Washington, DC: Georgetown Climate Center.Google Scholar
  82. Smith, M. S., L. Horrocks, A. Harvey, and C. Hamilton. 2011. Rethinking adaptation for a 4°C world. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A 369:196–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Stokes, D. E. 1997. Pasteur’s quadrant: Basic science and technological innovation. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.Google Scholar
  84. Stokes, J., and A. Horvath. 2006. Life cycle energy assessment of alternative water supply systems. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment 11:335–343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Storbjörk, S. 2010. “It takes more to get a ship to change course”: Barriers for organizational learning and local climate adaptation in Sweden. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning 12:235–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Thorstensen, L., and S. Nourick. 2010. Getting prepared: Economic development in a transforming energy economy. Washington, DC: International Economic Development Council.Google Scholar
  87. U.S. Bureau of Reclamation (Reclamation). 2005. Water 2025: Preventing crises and conflict in the West. http://permanent.access.gpo.gov/lps77383/Water%202025-08-05.pdf.Google Scholar
  88. U.S. Department of Energy (DOE). 2006. Energy demands on water resources: Report to Congress on the interdependency of energy and water. Albuquerque: Sandia National Laboratories. http://www.sandia.gov/energy-water/congress_report.htm.Google Scholar
  89. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). 2012a. 2010 greenhouse gas emissions from large facilities. http://ghgdata.epa.gov/ghgp/main.do (data reported to EPA as of August 15, 2012).Google Scholar
  90. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). 2012b. Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program 2010: Reported data. http://www.epa.gov/ghgreporting/ghgdata/reported/index.html (last updated October 4, 2012).Google Scholar
  91. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). N.d. Climate change action plans: Utah. http://www.epa.gov/statelocalclimate/local/local-examples/action-plans.html#ut (accessed June 14, 2012).
  92. Verbruggen, A., M. Fischedick, W. Moomaw, T. Weir, A. Nadaï, L. J. Nilsson, J. Nyboer, and J. Sathaye. 2009. Renewable energy costs, potentials, barriers: Conceptual issues. Energy Policy 38:850–861.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. Victor, D. G., M. G. Morgan, F. Apt, and J. Steinbruner, J. 2009. The geoengineering option: A last resort against global warming. Foreign Affairs 88:64–76.Google Scholar
  94. Waterfall, P. H. 2006. Harvesting rainwater for landscape use. Tucson: University of Arizona, Cooperative Extension Service. http://ag.arizona.edu/pubs/water/az1052/harvest.html.Google Scholar
  95. Wei, M., S. Patadia, and D. M. Kammen. 2010. Putting renewables and energy efficiency to work: How many jobs can the clean energy industry generate in the US? Energy Policy 38:919–931.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. Westley, F., P. Olsson, C. Folke, T. Homer-Dixon, H. Vredenburg, D. Loorbach, J. Thompson, et al. 2011. Tipping toward sustainability: Emerging pathways of transformation. AMBIO: A Journal of the Human Environment 40:762–780.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. Wheeler, S. M. 2000. Planning for metropolitan sustainability. Journal of Planning Education and Research 20:133–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. Wiek, A., F. Farioli, K. Fukushi, and M. Yarime. 2012. Sustainability science: Bridging the gap between science and society. Sustainability Science 7 (Suppl. 1): 1–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. Wilkinson, C. F. 1992. Crossing the next meridian: Land, water, and the future of the West. Washington, DC: Island Press.Google Scholar
  100. Willson, R. W. and K. D. Brown. 2008. Carbon neutrality at the local level: Achievable goal or fantasy? Journal of the American Planning Association 74:497–504.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  101. Worster, D. 1992. Rivers of empire: Water, aridity, and the growth of the American West. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  102. Zimmerman, R., and C. Faris. 2011. Climate change mitigation and adaptation in North American cities. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability 3:181–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  103. Zweibel, K., J. Mason, and V. Fthenakis. 2008. A solar grand plan. Scientific American 298:64–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Institute of the Environment 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Diana Liverman
    • 1
  • Susanne C. Moser
    • 2
  • Paul S. Weiland
    • 3
  • Lisa Dilling
    • 4
  • Maxwell T. Boykoff
    • 4
  • Heidi E. Brown
    • 1
  • Eric S. Gordon
    • 4
  • Christina Greene
    • 1
  • Eric Holthaus
    • 1
  • Deb A. Niemeier
    • 5
  • Stephanie Pincetl
    • 6
  • W. James Steenburgh
    • 7
  • Vincent C. Tidwell
    • 8
  • Jennifer Hoffman
  1. 1.University of ArizonaUSA
  2. 2.Susanne Moser Research and Consulting, Stanford UniversityUSA
  3. 3.Nossaman Inc.USA
  4. 4.University of ColoradoUSA
  5. 5.University of CaliforniaDavisUSA
  6. 6.University of CaliforniaLos AngelesUSA
  7. 7.University of UtahUSA
  8. 8.Sandia National LaboratoriesUSA

Personalised recommendations