The ethics of consuming: community, agency, and participation in global food systems


It is easy enough to think about preparing food, growing food, and eating food as straight-forward affairs, or mere biological necessities. However, these processes are wrapped up in social relations, personal identities, and political power. Broadly critical frameworks can help pull apart the varying dimensions in this complex and dynamic relationship in order to provide guidance for reforming our relationship to the food we consume in a more democratic and participatory direction. To that end, we explore the normative implications of the current organization of the world food system from multiple perspectives in critical theory, the philosophy of science, and political philosophy. We offer ethical and political analyses at the levels of community activism, national food policy, and global consumerist capitalism to show how an approach that sees these multiple levels as interactive can provide concrete reasons for supporting certain effective solutions.


food safety local food movement critical theory and strong objectivity 


  1. Bordieu, P. (1984). Distinctions: a social critique of the judgment of taste. Routledge, London, UK.Google Scholar
  2. Center for Disease Control and Prevention (2011). CDC estimates of foodborne illness in the United States. Available at: Scholar
  3. Dahlberg, K.A. (1993). Regenerative food systems: broadening the scope and agenda of sustainability. In: Allen, P. (ed.) Food for the future: conditions and contradictions of sustainability. Wiley, New York, NY, USA.Google Scholar
  4. DeLind, L.B. (2011). Are local food and the local food movement taking us where we want to go? Or are we hitching our wagons to the wrong stars? Agriculture and Human Values 28: 273–283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Delind, L.B. and Howard, P.H. (2008). Safe at any scale? Food scares, food regulation, and scaled alternatives. Agriculture and Human Values 25: 301–317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Desmarais, A.A. (2008). The power of peasants: reflections on the meanings of La Vía Campesina. Journal of Rural Studies 24: 138–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Douglas, H. (2009). Science, policy, and the value-free ideal. University of Pittsburgh Press, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.Google Scholar
  8. Douglas, M. and Isherwood, B. (1996). The world of goods: towards an anthropology of consumption. Routledge, New York, NY, USA.Google Scholar
  9. Fiorino, D. (1990). Citizen participation and environmental risk: a survey of institutional mechanisms. Science, Technology, and Human Values 15: 226–243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Flora, C.B. (2011). Review: Schanbacher, W.D.: The politics of food: the global conflict between food security and food sovereignty. Journal of Agriculture and Environment Ethics 24: 545–547.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2003). Trade reforms and food security: conceptualizing the linkages. FAO, Rome, Italy.Google Scholar
  12. Food and Drug Administration (2011). Background on the FDA food safety modernization act. Available at: Scholar
  13. Guston, D. (2000). Between politics and science: assuring the integrity and productivity of research. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Guthman, J. (2004). Agrarian dreams: the paradox of organic farming in California. University California Press, Berkeley, CA, USA.Google Scholar
  15. Harding, S. (2008). Sciences from below: feminisms, postcolonialities, and modernities. Duke University Press, Durham, NC, USA.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hassanein, N. (2011). Matters of scale and the politics of the food safety modernization act. Agriculture and Human Values 28(4): 577–581.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Heffernan, W. (1999). Consolidation in the food and agriculture system. Report to the National Farmers Union. National Farmers Union, Denver, CO, USAGoogle Scholar
  18. Hrding, S. (2004). Rethinking standpoint epistemology: what is ‘strong objectivity? In: Harding, S. (ed.) The feminist standpoint theory reader: intellectual and political controversies. Routledge, New York, NY, USA.Google Scholar
  19. Izberk- Bilgin, E. (2010). An interdisciplinary review of resistance to consumption: Consumer movements, activism, and ideology. Consumption Markets and Culture 13(3): 299–325.Google Scholar
  20. Kuzma, J. and Meghani, Z. (2009). The public option. EMBO Reports 10(12): 1288–1293.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Lyson, T.A. (2004). Civic agriculture: reconnecting farm, food, and community. Tufts University Press, Medford, MA, USA.Google Scholar
  22. Mitchell, S. (2009). The corporate co-opt of local. The wire. Available at: Scholar
  23. Mount, P. (2012). Growing local food: Scale and local food systems governance. Agriculture and Human Values 29(1): 107–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Pollan, M. (2009). A defense of food: an eater’s manifesto. Penguin Press, New York, NY, USA.Google Scholar
  25. Pollan, M. (2010). The food movement, rising. The New York Review of Books, June.Google Scholar
  26. Pollan, M. (2011). Food rules: an eater’s manual. Penguin Press, New York, NY, USA.Google Scholar
  27. Rittel, H. and Webber, M. (1973). Dilemmas in a general theory of planning. Policy Sciences 4: 155–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Roberts, T. (2007). Willingness to pay estimates of the societal costs of US food-borne illness. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 89(5): 1183–1188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Schanbacher, W. (2010). The politics of food: the global conflict between food security and food sovereignty. Praeger, Santa Barbara, CA, USA.Google Scholar
  30. Schrader-Frechette, K. (1991). Risk and rationality: philosophical foundations for populist reforms. University California Press, Berkeley, CA, USA.Google Scholar
  31. Ulver-Sneistrup, S., Akergaard, S. and Kristensen, D.B. (2011). The new work ethics of consumption and the paradox of mundane brand resistance. Journal of Consumer Culture 11(2): 215–238.Google Scholar
  32. Whittman, H. (2010). Food sovereignty: reconnecting food, nature, and community. Food First Books, Oakland, CA, USA.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Wageningen Academic Publishers 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PhilosophyMichigan State UniversityEast LansingUSA

Personalised recommendations