Abstract
The aim of the current study was to describe the perspectives of stakeholders within the dairy industry on key issues affecting the welfare of dairy cattle. A secondary aim was to examine if these stakeholders believed that people outside of the industry should also have a voice in formulating solutions to these issues. Five heterogeneous focus groups were conducted during a dairy cattle industry meeting in Guelph, Canada in October 2012. Each group contained between 7–10 participants and consisted of a mix of dairy producers, veterinarians, researchers, students, and industry specialists. The 1-h facilitatorled discussions focused on participants’ perceptions of the key welfare issues and the role of different stakeholder groups in addressing these concerns. Discussions were audio-recorded and transcribed verbatim, and the resulting transcripts coded and the themes identified. Lameness was uniformly recognized as the most important welfare issue facing dairy cattle; cow comfort, painful procedures (like dehorning) and production diseases (like mastitis) were also commonly discussed. Participants had mixed views on the roles of different stakeholders in formulating solutions. Most felt that producers and others working within the dairy industry (particularly veterinarians) should be primarily responsible, but many participants acknowledged that the general public, as consumers and as citizens, also play an important role. Participants seemed to focus on a two-fold knowledge deficit - first between researchers and producers, and second between dairy industry groups and the public - and agreed that improved knowledge translation was required to develop solutions to welfare concerns. These results indicate that many people within the dairy industry see value in more inclusive engagement with non-industry stakeholders about dairy cattle welfare. Future work will assess perspectives of people outside of the dairy industry to identify areas of shared concern and provide a basis for policy solutions that better incorporate societal values.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Boogaard, B.K., Oosting, S.J. and Bock, B.B. (2008). Defining sustainability as a socio-cultural concept: citizen panels visiting dairy farms in the Netherlands. Livestock Science 117: 24–33.
Brom, F.W.A. 2000. Food, consumer concerns, and trust: food ethics for a globalizing market. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 12: 127–139.
Callon, M., Lascoumes, P. and Barthe, Y. (2009). Acting in an uncertain world: an essay on technical democracy. MIT Press, London, UK.
Castle, D. and Culver, K. (2006). Public engagement, public consultation, innovation and the market. Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management 6: 137–152.
Croney, C.C. (2010). Words matter: implications of semantics and imagery in framing animal-welfare issues. Journal of Veterinary Medical Education 37: 101–106.
Croney, C.C., Apley, M., Capper, J.L., Mench, J.A. and Priest, S. (2012). The ethical food movement: what does it mean for the role of science and scientists in current debates about animal agriculture? Journal of Animal Science 90: 1570–1582.
Ellis, K.A., Billington, K., McNeil, B. and McKeegan, D.E.F. (2009). Public opinion on UK milk marketing and dairy cow welfare. Animal Welfare 18: 267–282.
Lassen, J., Sandoe, P. and Forkman, B. (2006). Happy pigs are dirty! Conflicting perspectives on animal welfare. Livestock Sciemce 103: 221–230.
Rowe, G. and Frewer, L.J. (2005). A typology of public engagement mechanisms. Science Technology and Human Values 30: 251–290.
Schiele, B. (2008). On and about the deficit model in an age of free flow. In: Cheng, D., Claessens, M., Gascoigne, T., Metcalfe, J. Schiele, B. and Shi, S. (ed.) Communicating science in social contexts. Springer, Dortrecht, the Netherlands, p. 93–117.
Te Velde, H.T., Aarts, N. and Van Woerkum, C. (2002). Dealing with ambivalence: farmers’ and consumers’ perceptions of animal welfare in livestock breeding. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 15: 203–219.
Vanhonacker, F., Verbeke, W., Van Poucke, E. and Tuyttens, F.A.M. (2008). Do citizens and farmers interpret the concept of farm animal welfare differently? Livestock Science 116: 126–136.
Acknowledgements
We thank Ken and Barbara Leslie and Amy Stanton, without whose support these focus groups would not have occurred. Thanks also to our moderators who generously donated their time in order to train and execute the focus groups - we could not have carried out this project without them. Finally, many thanks especially to our wonderful participants who shared their time and their views with us.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2013 Wageningen Academic Publishers
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Ventura, B.A., von Keyserlingk, M.A.G., Weary, D.M. (2013). The welfare of dairy cattle: perspectives of industry stakeholders. In: Röcklinsberg, H., Sandin, P. (eds) The ethics of consumption. Wageningen Academic Publishers, Wageningen. https://doi.org/10.3920/978-90-8686-784-4_35
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3920/978-90-8686-784-4_35
Publisher Name: Wageningen Academic Publishers, Wageningen
Online ISBN: 978-90-8686-784-4
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)