Skip to main content

Employing the capability approach in assigning individual responsibility for sustainable development

  • Chapter
The ethics of consumption
  • 2789 Accesses

Abstract

The capability approach (CA) gives a static picture of how individual capabilities come about. Sustainable development (SD) deals with societal development, that is, a collective and temporal process. Employing the CA in re-conceptualizing SD thus necessitates accommodating that individual behavior individually and collectively creates feedbacks on natural and social conditions. Acknowledging negative feedbacks of individual behavior on natural conditions allows reasoning the necessity for changing individual behavior. However, since SD constitutes a societal challenge, assigning responsibility for SD to individuals alone overburdens individuals. This contribution argues that employing the CA in re-conceptualizing SD allows explaining the occurrence of such overburden and demonstrating how it can be alleviated.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Christen, M. and Schmidt, S. (2011). A formal framework for theories of sustainability. Sustainable Development 20(6): 400–410.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cripps, E. (2011). Climate change, collective harm and legitimate coercion. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 14(2): 171–193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dietrich, J. (2009). Zum Verhältnis von Ethik und Empirie: ein Ãœberblick am Beispiel der Schmerzmedizin. In: Vollmann, J. (ed.) Klinische Ethik. Aktuelle Entwicklungen in Theorie und Praxis. Campus, Frankfurt, Germany, pp. 225–239.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grunwald, A. (2010). Wider die Privatisierung der Nachhaltigkeit. Warum ökologisch korrekter Konsum die Umwelt nicht retten kann. Gaia 19(3): 178–182.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hourdequin, M. (2011). Climate change and individual responsibility: a reply to Johnson. Environmental Values 20(2): 157–162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Isaacs, T. (2011). Moral responsibility in collective contexts. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Parfit, D. (1984). Reasons and persons. Clarendon Press, Oxford, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schultz, E., Christen, M., Voget-Kleschin, L. and Burger, P. (2013). A sustainability-fitting interpretation of the capability approach: integrating the natural dimension by employing feedback loops. Journal of Human Development and Capabilities 14(1): 115–133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sen, A.K. (2007). Development as freedom. 13th ed. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen, A.K. (2009). The idea of justice. Allen Lane, London, UK.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to L. Voget-Kleschin .

Editor information

Helena Röcklinsberg Per Sandin

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Wageningen Academic Publishers

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Voget-Kleschin, L. (2013). Employing the capability approach in assigning individual responsibility for sustainable development. In: Röcklinsberg, H., Sandin, P. (eds) The ethics of consumption. Wageningen Academic Publishers, Wageningen. https://doi.org/10.3920/978-90-8686-784-4_13

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics