Crop and weed species recognition based on hyperspectral sensing and active learning

Conference paper

Abstract

In this paper, a new active learning method is proposed, which distinguishes between crop and weed based on their different spectral reflectances. A method comprising novel detection and incremental class augmentation was implemented. Novel detection was based on one class classifiers. Under field conditions, crop and weed species can be recognised successfully. Best results for the active learning were obtained for the one-class Mixture of Gaussians (MOG) and Self Organising Map (SOM) classifiers. The MOG and SOM performance in crop recognition was 100% and 96% respectively while the recognition for different weed species ranged from 31-98% (MOG) and 43-94% (SOM).

Keywords

spectrograph self-organizing map mixture of Gaussians one-class classifier 

References

  1. Borregaard, T., Nielsen, H., Norgaard, L. and Have, H. 2000. Crop-weed discrimination by line imaging spectroscopy. Journal of Agricultural Engineering Research. 75 (4) 389–400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Crupi, V., Guglielmino, E. and Millazo, G. 2004. Neural-Network-Based System for Novel Fault Detection in Rotating Machinery, Journal of Vibration and Control 10 1137–1150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Duda, R. and Hart, P. 1973. Pattern Classification and Scene Analysis. John Wiley & Sons, New York, 512 pp.Google Scholar
  4. Herrala, E., Okkonen, J., Hyvarinen, T., Aikio, M. and Lammasniemi, J. 1994. Imaging spectrometer for process industry applications SPIE 2248 33–40.Google Scholar
  5. Moshou, D., Vrindts, E., De Ketelaere, B., De Baerdemaeker, J., Ramon, H. 2001. A Neural Network based plant classifier. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture 31 (1) 5–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Moshou, D., Ramon, H., De Baerdemaeker, J. 2002. A weed species spectral detector based on neural networks. Precision Agriculture 3 (3) 209–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Saunders, R. and Gero, J. S. 2001. A Curious Design Agent: A Computational Model of Novelty-Seeking Behaviour in Design. In: (Eds.) Gero, J. S., Chase, S. and Rosenman, S., Proceedings of the Sixth Conference on Computer Aided Architectural Design Research in Asia (CAADRIA 2001). Key Centre of Design Computing and Cognition, University of Sydney, Sydney, pp 345–50.Google Scholar
  8. Søgaard, H.T. 2005. Weed classification by active shape models. Biosystems Engineering 91 271–281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Tarassenko, L., Hayton, P. and Brady, M. 1995. Novelty detection for the identification of masses in mammograms. In: Proceedings of the Fourth International IEE Conference on Artificial Neural Networks, volume 409, pp 442–447.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Wang, C., Zho, B. and Palm, H. L. 2008. Detecting Invasive Sericea Lespedeza (Lespedeza cuneata) in Mid-Missouri Pastureland Using Hyperspectral Imagery, Environmental Management 41 853–862.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Wageningen Academic Publishers The Netherlands 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • D. Moshou
    • 1
  • D. Kateris
    • 1
  • X-E. Pantazi
    • 1
  • I. Gravalos
    • 2
  1. 1.Agricultural Engineering LaboratoryAristotle University, School of AgricultureThessalonikiGreece
  2. 2.Department of Biosystems EngineeringTechnological Educational Institute of Larissa, School of Agricultural TechnologyLarissaGreece

Personalised recommendations