Fieldcopter: unmanned aerial systems for crop monitoring services

  • T. van der Wal
  • B. Abma
  • A. Viguria
  • E. Prévinaire
  • P. J. Zarco-Tejada
  • P. Serruys
  • E. van Valkengoed
  • P. van der Voet
Conference paper

Abstract

Satellite remote sensing is considered to be a good source of crop monitoring information. However, regions that experience significant cloud cover are often unable to acquire timely satellite imagery. FieldCopter addresses this problem and explores how unmanned aerial systems (UAS), suitably equipped with multispectral sensors, can provide an alternative, reliable and flexible information source on crop and soil status. Calculations from hourly meteorological data show that satellite-based remote sensing has a 20% probability of producing an adequate image. However, the probability of a usable image from a light-weight, weather sensitive UAS is 45% and over 70% for an all-weather UAS. FieldCopter demonstrates that, despite cloud cover and other adverse weather conditions, the UAS will complement and enhance the performance of any satellite remote sensing service to provide imagery essential for farmers engaged in precision agriculture.

Keywords

FieldCopter image acquisition cloud interference UAS 

References

  1. DMCii, 2011, Press release of DMC International Imaging, published 10/11/2011. www.technologynewsroom.com/press_releases/company_releases.aspx?story=1925.
  2. Hahn, C. J., Warren, S. G. and London, J. 1995. The effect of moonlight on observation of cloud cover at night, and application to cloud climatology. Journal of Climate 8.5 1429–1446.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Holland, D. and Marshall, P. 2004. Updating maps in a well-mapped country using high resolution satellite imagery. XX. Congress of International Society for Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing (ISPRS), Commission II, Working Group II/6. 2004. IAPRS, Vol. XXXV-B2, pp. 747–751. www.isprs.org/proceedings/XXXV/congress/comm2/papers/226.pdf Google Scholar
  4. Krischke, M. 2000. RapidEye: the Upcoming New Satellite Based GEO-Information System. In: Proceedings of the International Symposium GEOMARK 2000, European Space Agency, Paris, France. ESA Special Publications Vol. 458.Google Scholar
  5. Können, G. P. 1983. Het weer in Nederland. (Weather in the Netherlands). W.J. Thieme & Cie BV, Zutphen, the Netherlands, 143pp.Google Scholar
  6. Richter, R. 2008. Atmospheric/topographic correction for satellite imagery (ATCOR-2/3 User Guide, Version 6.1). German Aerospace Center, Wessling, Germany. DLR-1B 565–01.Google Scholar
  7. Zhang, C. and Kovacs, J. M. 2012. The application of small unmanned aerial systems for precision agriculture: a review. Precision Agriculture 13 (6) 693–712.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Wageningen Academic Publishers The Netherlands 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • T. van der Wal
    • 1
  • B. Abma
    • 1
  • A. Viguria
    • 2
  • E. Prévinaire
    • 3
  • P. J. Zarco-Tejada
    • 4
  • P. Serruys
    • 5
  • E. van Valkengoed
    • 6
  • P. van der Voet
    • 6
  1. 1.AeroVisionNaardenthe Netherlands
  2. 2.CATECLa Rinconada (Sevilla)Spain
  3. 3.Flying CamOupeyeBelgium
  4. 4.IAS-CSICCórdobaSpain
  5. 5.Aurea ImagingZaventemBelgium
  6. 6.TerraSphereAmsterdamthe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations