Abstract
More and more, animal production is questioned, not only by animal welfare organizations or vegans, but also in the context of climate change. Some even say that animals are the number one greenhouse gas emitters, not only directly (e.g. ruminants), but also indirectly by land use change, especially in South America. Others say that animals are a very inefficient way of food production, since feed conversion always means a certain loss. From a food production point of view, animal production can be divided into three groups. The first one is the group of extensive grazers. Since only a small percentage of the land surface is arable land, herbivores (especially ruminants) are the only way to produce on – from an anthropocentric point of view – ‘useless’ grounds. Also, one billion poor people in those regions are depending on animals for food, manure, draught or as ‘living bank’ in those harsh conditions. Animals are thus necessary to survive and everything produced by them can be seen as a net gain, increasing the land use efficiency. Secondly, animals can be used as converters of crop residues, especially meals from vegetable oil production for human consumption, chemistry or biofuels. Animals, especially ruminants, are very efficient in recycling energy and proteins which are not digestible or wanted as food by humans (or other animals). Probably, second generation biofuels shall replace at least for some part the use of animals as converters, depending on economics or policy. To balance the animals’ diet, also grains are needed to make sure the animals stay healthy. If you look at feed efficiency in this way, efficiency ratios for different animal species differ from the traditional feed conversion and for some species animal production even means an efficiency gain. The third group is the surplus group. Those animals are produced not because they use ‘useless’ land or energy and proteins, but because some people are wealthy enough to feed them with edible products. Although some of them have the best feed conversion ratios, this group of (mostly monogastric) animals produces animal products in an inefficient way from a human-animal-competition or ecological point of view. Only this group of animals could be considered as ethically problematic. It will become a pressing issue because of the increasing demand from upcoming economies for animal luxury products.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Coutand, M., Cyr, M., Deydier, E., Guilet, R. and Clastres, P. (2008). Characteristics of industrial and laboratory meat and bone meal ashes and their potential applications. Journal of Hazardous Materials 150: 522–532.
European Commission (EC) (2002). Laying down health rules concerning animal by-products not intended for human consumption. European Commission. 1774/2002/EC, 177 pp.
European Feed Manufacturers’ Federation (FEFAC) (2011). 54th FEFAC Annual General Meeting. Bruges, 8–9 June 2011.
European Union (2010). The TSE Road map 2: A Strategy paper on Transmissible Spongiform Encephalopathies for 2010–2015. European Commision, COM 384, 36 pp.
FAOSTAT (2009a). ResourceSTAT: Land [online]. FAOSTAT. Available on http://faostat.fao.org/site/377/default.aspx [consulted on 22 november 2011].
FAOSTAT (2009b). Production: Live animals [online] FAOSTAT. Available on http://faostat.fao.org/site/573/default.aspx#ancor [consulted on 24 december 2011]
Foley, J.A., Ramankutty, N., Brauman, K.A., Cassidy, E.S., Gerber, J.S., Johnston, M., Mueller, N.D., O’Connell, Ch, Ray, D.K., West, P.C., Balzer, C., Bennett, E.M., Carpenter, S.R., Hill, J., Monfreda, C., Polasky, S., Röckstrom, J., Sheehan, J., Siebert, S., Tilman, D. and Zaks, D.P. (2011). Solutions for a cultivated planet. Nature, 478: 337–342.
Food and Agricultural Organisation of the United Nations (FAO) (2010). The State of Food Insecurity in the World. FAO, Rome, 62 pp.
Keyzer, M.A., Merbis, M.D., Pavel, I.F.P.W. and Van Wesenbeeck, C.F.A. (2005). Diet shifts towards meat and the effects on cereal use: can we feed the animals in 2030? Ecological Economics 55: 187–202.
Mondini, C., Cayuela, M.L., Sinicco, T., Sánchez-Monedero, M.A., Bertolone, E. and Bardi, L. (2008). Soil application of meat and bone meal. Short-term effects on mineralization dynamics and soil biochemical and microbiological properties. Soil Biology and Biochemistr 40: 462–474.
Speedy, A.W. (2004). Overview of world feed proteins need and supply. In: Protein sources for the animal feed industry. FAO, Rome, pp. 9–28.
Srinivasan, C.S., Irz, X. and Shankar, B. (2006). An assessment of the potential consumption impacts of WHO dietary norms in OECD countries. Food Policy 31: 53–77.
Steinfeld, H., Gerber, P., Wassenaar, T., Castel, V., Rosales, M. and de Haan, C. (2006). Livestock’s Long Shadow. FAO, Rome. 390 p.
U.S. Census Bureau (2011). International Data Base [online]. U.S. Census Bureau. Available on http://www.census.gov/ population/international/data/idb/informationGateway.php [consulted on 14 november 2011].
UNDESA. United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs (2011). World Population Prospects: The 2010 Revision [on line]. United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs. Available on: http://esa.un.org/ unpd/wpp/Other-Information/Press_Release_WPP2010.pdf [date of consultation: 19 sept 2011].
Van Es, A.J.H. (1975). Heterotrofe productie bij dieren. In: Beukema, J.J., de Wit, C.T., Golterman, H.L., Gulati, R.D., Korringa, P., Pieters, G.A., Stouthamer, A.H., Van der Drift, J., Van Es, A.J.H., Vervelde, G.J., Wassink, E.C. and Woldendorp, J.W. (eds.) Productiviteit in biologische systemen. Verweij, Wageningen, the Netherlands, pp. 105–127.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2012 Wageningen Academic Publishers
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Boonen, R., Aerts, S., Meganck, M., De Tavernier, J., Lips, D., Decuypere, E. (2012). Feed efficiencies in animal production: a non-numerical analysis. In: Potthast, T., Meisch, S. (eds) Climate change and sustainable development. Wageningen Academic Publishers, Wageningen. https://doi.org/10.3920/978-90-8686-753-0_28
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3920/978-90-8686-753-0_28
Publisher Name: Wageningen Academic Publishers, Wageningen
Online ISBN: 978-90-8686-753-0
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)