Skip to main content

Proteomic analysis of cryoconserved bull sperm to enhance ERCR classification scores of fertility

  • Conference paper
  • 658 Accesses

Abstract

Breeding of dairy cattle for high production and the reproductive management of herd is the biggest problem and it accounts for a large part on costs of production. A negative association has been observed between the level of livestock production and fertility. This is linked both to genetic factors (inbreeding and high production) and physiological factors (metabolic by high production)1. A lot of resources have been used for enhancement of cattle fertility but few studies and interventions are reported to control and to enhance the effect on the bull reproductive efficiency. As the patterns of selection and reproductive management of dairy cattle is based on the use of artificial insemination (AI) it is easy to understand the importance of assessing the level of fertility of bull breeder. One method of evaluating relative sire fertility currently used is the estimated relative conception rate (ERCR). ERCR is the difference in conception rate (nonreturn rate at 56 day) of a sire compared with other AI sires used in the same herd2. In this work the nonreturn rate was estimated at 56 d for first insemination of lactating cows (www.anafi.it). At present, validation of genomic markers that are able to predict with high confidence high or low fertility of a given sire it is very difficult using population estimates of sire fertility. The reason is because these methods do not measure the bull ‘true fertility’3. To unravel the biological display of the bull genome, proteomics, that focus at the protein level could lead to the development of novel biomarkers that may allow for detection of bull fertility levels4,5. The aim of this study is to evaluate, through the differential proteome analysis, changes in protein expression profiles of spermatozoa from bulls with high fertility (high ERCR score) and low fertility (low ERCR score) in order to identify possible protein markers to be used as indices of fertility.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   69.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Bach, A., Valls, N., Solans, A. & Torrent, T. Associations between nondietary factors and dairy herd performance. J Dairy Sci 91, 3259–67 (2008).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Clay, J.S. & McDaniel, B.T. Computing mating bull fertility from DHI nonreturn data. J Dairy Sci 84, 1238–45 (2001).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Amann, R.P. & Dejarnette, J.M. Impact of genomic selection of AI dairy sires on their likely utilization and methods to estimate fertility: a paradigm shift. Theriogenology (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Tomar, A.K. et al. Differential proteomics of sperm: insights, challenges and future prospects. Biomark Med 4, 905–10 (2010).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Gaviraghi, A. et al. Proteomics to investigate fertility in bulls. Vet Res Commun 34 Suppl 1, S33-6 (2010).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Edwards, Y.H. & Grootegoed, J.A. A sperm-specific enolase. J Reprod Fertil 68, 305–10 (1983).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Martinez-Heredia, J., de Mateo, S., Vidal-Taboada, J.M., Ballesca, J.L. & Oliva, R. Identification of proteomic differences in asthenozoospermic sperm samples. Hum Reprod 23, 783–91 (2008).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Moura, A.A., Souza, C.E., Stanley, B.A., Chapman, D.A. & Killian, G.J. Proteomics of cauda epididymal fluid from mature Holstein bulls. J Proteomics 73, 2006–20 (2010).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Moura, A.A., Chapman, D.A., Koc, H. & Killian, G.J. Proteins of the cauda epididymal fluid associated with fertility of mature dairy bulls. J Androl 27, 534–41 (2006).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Zhao, C. et al. Identification of several proteins involved in regulation of sperm motility by proteomic analysis. Fertil Steril 87, 436–8 (2007).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Paul, C., Teng, S. & Saunders, P.T. A single, mild, transient scrotal heat stress causes hypoxia and oxidative stress in mouse testes, which induces germ cell death. Biol Reprod 80, 913–9 (2009).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Aitken, R.J. & Baker, M.A. Oxidative stress and male reproductive biology. Reprod Fertil Dev 16, 581–8 (2004).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Baker, M.A. & Aitken, R.J. The importance of redox regulated pathways in sperm cell biology. Mol Cell Endocrinol 216, 47–54 (2004).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Work supported by PRO.ZOO Project. ISILS.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alessio Soggiu .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Wageningen Academic Publishers

About this paper

Cite this paper

Soggiu, A. et al. (2012). Proteomic analysis of cryoconserved bull sperm to enhance ERCR classification scores of fertility. In: Rodrigues, P., Eckersall, D., de Almeida, A. (eds) Farm animal proteomics. Wageningen Academic Publishers. https://doi.org/10.3920/978-90-8686-751-6_46

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics