Skip to main content

Discourses of community forestry

  • Chapter
Book cover Forest-people interfaces

Abstract

This chapter uses the discourse concept and theory to explore discourses of community forestry. The concept of community forestry (CF) was introduced by the UN Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) in the 1970s and promoted by them since then. Three major shifts in CF discourses are described: the forest resource scarcity CF discourse, the tropical forest conservation CF discourse and the community enterprise CF discourse, leaving the question unanswered whether they should be considered as distinctive discourses, or rather as one discourse with different key elements. These three are the most prominent manifestations of the CF discourse, but other more specific discourses could also be identified as CF discourses or modifications of the CF discourse, such as the forest common property discourse and the adaptive forest management discourse. I analyse each of the three CF discourses, reviewing their main arguments, their main protagonists and their public manifestations. The chapter also reviews wider societal trends and how they link to the shifts in CF discourses. The forest resource scarcity CF discourse emerged shortly after the beginning of the international concern about whether the world’s limited natural resources will be sufficient to meet future economic growth and related consumption. The tropical forest conservation CF discourse appears to have been a result of international concern about tropical deforestation, which has dominated international environmental agendas since the 1980s. Finally, the community enterprise CF discourse appears closely linked to a worldwide shift towards neoliberal economic policies, a reduction in the role of government in non-public affairs and a focus on poverty reduction in international development assistance. The three examples suggest a close relation between CF discourses and practice and other wider societal environmental and economic concerns and discussions. Given the emerging concern about climate change issues, it can be predicted that a future CF discourse will likely incorporate climate change mitigation elements.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 79.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • AIDESEP (2011). Construyendo REDD Indigena. Available at: http://www.forestpeoples.org/.

  • Angelsen, A. and Kaimowitz, D. (1999). Rethinking the causes of deforestation: lessons from economic models. The World Bank Research Observer 14(1): 73–98.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Arnold, M. (1991). Community forestry: ten years in review. Food and Agriculture Organization, Rome, Italy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arts, B. and Buizer, M. (2009). Forests, discourses, institutions. A discursive-institutional analysis of global forest governance. Forest Policy and Economics 11: 340–347.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arts, B., Appelstrand, M., Eba’a Atyi, R., Enters, T., Hamakers, I., Kleinschmit, D., Pulzl, H., Visseren-McGinley K. and Yasmi, Y. (2010). Discourses, actors and instruments in international forest governance. Embracing complexity - meeting the challenges of international forest governance. IUFRO World Series 28, pp. 57–73. Available at: http://www.iufro.org/science/gfep/forest-regime-panel/report/.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eckholm, E. (1975). The other energy crisis: firewood. Worldwatch Paper 1, Worldwatch Institute, Washington, DC, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Jong, W. (2010). Forest rehabilitation and its implication for forestry transition theory. Biotropica 42(1): 3–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Jong, W. and Ruiz, S. (2011). Strangers among trees: policies and politics for foreign residents in northern Bolivian forests. Forest Policies and Economics, in press. DOI: http:/dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2011.02.004.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Jong, W., Louman, L., Pokorny, B., Sabogal, C., and Stoian, D. (2008). Antecedentes, realidad y oportunidades del manejo forestal comunitario en América Latina. In: Sabogal, C., De Jong, W., Lauman, B. and Pokorny, B. (eds.) El manejo forestal comunitario en America Latina: experiencias, lecciones aprendidas y retos para el futuro. CIFOR, CATIE, Belem, Brazil, pp. 33–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eckholm, E. (1975). The other wood energy crisis, firewood. Worldwatch Institute, Washington, DC, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elands, B. and Wiersum, F. (2001). Forestry and rural development in Europe: an exploration of socio-political discourses. Forest Policy and Economics 3(1/2): 5–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO). (1978). Forestry for local community development. Forestry Paper 7, FAO, Rome, Italy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hajer, M. and Versteeg, W. (2005). A decade of discourse analysis of environmental politics: achievements, challenges, perspectives. Journal of Environmental Policy and Planning 7(3): 175–184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hickey, S. and Mohan, G. (2004). Participation: from tyranny to transformation? Exploring new approaches to participation in development. Zed Books, London, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kleinschmit, D. (2011). Confronting the demands of a deliberative public sphere with media constraints. Forest Policy and Economics, in press. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2010.02.013.

    Google Scholar 

  • McDermott, M. and Schreckenberg, K. (2009). Equity in community forestry: insights from North and South. International Forestry Review 11(2): 57–170.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pacheco, P., De Jong, W. and Johnson, J. (2010). The evolution of the timber sector in lowland Bolivia: Examining the influence of three disparate policy approaches. Forest Policy and Economics 12: 271–276.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peters, C.M., Gentry, A.H. and Mendelsohn, R.O. (1989). Valuation of an Amazonian rainforest. Nature 339: 655–656.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pokorny, B., De Jong, W., Louman, B., Pacheco, P., Porro, N., Sabogal, C. and Stoian, D. (2008). Experiencias y retos del manejo forestal comunitario en America Latina. Recursos Naturales y Ambiente 54: 81–98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richardson, T. and Sharp, L. (2001). Reflections on Foucauldian discourse analysis in planning and environmental policy research. Journal of Environmental Policy and Planning 3: 193–209.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sabogal, C., De Jong, W., Pokorny, B. and Lauman, B. (eds.) ( 2008). El manejo forestal comunitario en America Latina: experiencias, lecciones aprendidas y retos para el futuro. CIFOR, CATIE, Belem, Brazil.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winkel, G. (2011). Foucault in the forests: a review of the use of ‘Foucauldian’ concepts in forest policy analysis. Forest Policy and Economics, in press. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2010.11.009.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Wil de Jong .

Editor information

Bas Arts Séverine van Bommel Mirjam Ros-Tonen Gerard Verschoor

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Wageningen Academic Publishers

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

de Jong, W. (2012). Discourses of community forestry. In: Arts, B., van Bommel, S., Ros-Tonen, M., Verschoor, G. (eds) Forest-people interfaces. Wageningen Academic Publishers, Wageningen. https://doi.org/10.3920/978-90-8686-749-3_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics