Abstract
Biocultural diversity is usually associated with traditional ways in which local or indigenous people interact with the natural environment. This chapter deals with biocultural diversity practices in a highly modernised society, the Netherlands. It introduces the concept of ‘biocultural creatives’: groups of people who, driven by an engagement with society and nature, create new cultural models and practices for interaction with biodiversity. Biocultural creativity aims to reconnect people with nature and is sought for in this chapter within the domains of recreation (use of nature) and financial support and volunteer activities (nature protection). Within recreational practices, creativity is found in the application or rejection of technology and the world of fantasy or contemplation; within financial support, creativity is found in traditional economic instruments applied to the world of nature conservation; and within volunteer work, creativity is found through the modernisation of traditional volunteer activities and new styles of citizen governance in the planning, design and management of conservation areas and landscapes. We conclude that although none of the biocultural creative initiatives have been adopted by large groups of Dutch citizens, they are important to the conservation of biodiversity because they re-create a constant awareness of the cultural roots of nature conservation and remind us that these roots link up to the dynamics in society and because they enrich our cultural connectedness with the natural environment. Therefore, we encourage policy-makers and nature managers to see biocultural diversity as an opportunity for the emergence of new perspectives and ideas, which can be meaningful for nature conservation. We also recommend researchers to do further studies into the dynamic and creative aspects of biodiversity that we touch upon in this chapter.
Keywords
- biocultural diversity
- cultural creative
- nature conservation
- people
- activities
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
Bijl, R., Boelhouwer, J., Pommer, E. and Schyns, P. (2010). The social state of the Netherlands 2009. The Netherlands Research for Social Research, The Hague, the Netherlands.
Cocks, M.L. (2006). Wild plant resources and cultural practices in rural and urban households in South Africa: implication for bio-cultural diversity conservation. PhD thesis, Wageningen University, Wageningen, the Netherlands.
Cocks, M.L., Bangay, L., Shackleton, C.M. and Wiersum, K.F. (2008). ‘Rich man poor man’ – inter-household and community factors influencing the use of wild plant resources amongst rural households in South Africa. International Journal of Sustainable Development and World Ecology 15: 198–210.
Cocks, M.L. and Wiersum, K.F. (2003). The significance of biodiversity to rural households in Eastern Cape Province of South Africa. Forests, Trees and Livelihoods 13: 39–58.
Cronon, W. (ed.) (1995). Uncommon ground. Toward reinventing nature. Norton, New York, NY, USA.
De Bakker, E., Van Koppen, C.S.A. and Vader, J. (2007). Het groene hart van burgers. Het maatschappelijk draagvlak voor natuur en natuurbeleid. WOt rapport 47, Wettelijke Onderzoekstaken Natuur & Milieu, Wageningen, the Netherlands.
Elands, B. and Kaae, B.C. (2010). Unique experiences. In: Probstl, U., Wirth, V., Elands, B. and Bell, S. (eds.) Management of recreation and nature based tourism in European forests. Springer- Verlag, Berlin, Germany, pp. 266–285.
Forestry Commission England (2007). Faith woodlands, Dec 2006 – March 2007 – The first phase. Available at: http://www.forestry.gov.uk/pdf/fce-faith-in-the-woodlands.pdf/$FILE/fce-faith-in-the-woodlands.pdf.
Goossen, C.M. (2008). Monitoring recreatiegedrag van Nederlanders in landelijke gebieden; 2006/2007. WOt werkdocument 146, Wettelijke Onderzoekstaken Natuur & Milieu, Wageningen, the Netherlands.
Hames, R (2007). The ecologically noble savage debate. Annual Review of Anthropology 36: 177–190.
Henstra, A. (2008). The child’s right to nature – a call for inclusion of the right to contact with nature in the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child. wAarde Foundation, Beek-Ubbergen, the Netherlands.
Kadijk, J. (2011). Doe-het-zelf vergt anders denken van planners: actief burgerschap gedijt beter binnen goede systemen. NIROV, the Hague, the Netherlands. Available at: http://www.nirov.nl/Home/Nieuws/Nieuws_Items/Doe-het-zelf_vergt_anders_denken_van_planners.aspx?mId=10437&rId=477.
Posey, D.A. (1999). Cultural and spiritual values of biodiversity. A complementary contribution to the global biodiversity assessment. In: Posey, D.A. (ed.) Cultural and spiritual values of biodiversity. UNEP and Intermediate Technology Publications, London, UK, pp. 1–19.
Pretty, J., Adams, B., Berkes, F., Ferreira de Athayde, S., Dudley, N., Hunn, E., Maffi, L., Milton, K., Rapport, D., Robbins, P., Sterling, E., Stolton, S., Tsing, A., Vintinner, E. and Pilgrim, S. (2009). The intersections of biological diversity and cultural diversity: Towards integration. Conservation and Society 7(2): 100–112.
Ray, P.H. and Anderson, S.R. (2000). The cultural creatives: how 50 million people are changing the world. Three Rivers Press, New York, NY, USA.
Schama, S. (1995). Landscape and memory. HarperCollins, London, UK.
Triple, E. (2011). Landscape auction: an investment tool for nature. Available at: http://www.tripleee.nl/landscapeauction.htm.
Turnhout, E., Van Bommel, S. and Aarts, N. (2010). How participation creates citizens: participatory governance as performative practice. Ecology and Society 15(4): 26. Available at: http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol15/iss4/art26/
United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO) (2008). Links between biological and cultural diversity-concepts, methods and experiences. Report of an International Workshop, UNESCO, France, Paris.
Van Dam, R., Salverda, I. and During, R. (2011). Effecten van burgerinitiatieven en de rol van de rijksoverheid. Deel 5 in de reeks Burgers en Landschap, Alterra, Wageningen UR, Wageningen, the Netherlands.
Van Koppen, C.S.A. (2002). Echte natuur: een sociaaltheoretisch onderzoek naar natuurwaardering en natuurbescherming in de moderne samenleving. PhD thesis, Wageningen University, Wageningen, the Netherlands.
Vreke, J. (2011). Er is geen markt voor natuur en landschap. Landwerk 2011(5): 16–18.
Wensing, D. (2008). Landscape auctions, a new financing tool for nature. Agribusiness 3(2): 32–33.
Wiersum, K.F. and Shrestha, K. (2010). Biocultural diversity in community forestry in Nepal. ETFRN News 51: 20–24
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2012 Wageningen Academic Publishers
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Elands, B.H.M., van Koppen, C.S.A.(. (2012). Biocultural diversity in the Netherlands: from ecologically noble savages towards biocultural creatives. In: Arts, B., van Bommel, S., Ros-Tonen, M., Verschoor, G. (eds) Forest-people interfaces. Wageningen Academic Publishers, Wageningen. https://doi.org/10.3920/978-90-8686-749-3_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3920/978-90-8686-749-3_11
Publisher Name: Wageningen Academic Publishers, Wageningen
Online ISBN: 978-90-8686-749-3
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)
-
Published in cooperation with
http://www.wageningenacademic.com/