Abstract
Improved udder health requires consistent application of appropriate management practices by those involved in managing dairy herds and the milking process. Designing effective communication requires that we understand why dairy herd managers behave in the way they do and also how the means of communication can be used both to inform and to influence. Social sciences- ranging from economics to anthropology – have been used to shed light on the behaviour of those who manage farm animals. Communication science tells us that influencing behaviour is not simply a question of ‘getting the message across’ but of addressing the complex of factors that influence an individual’s behavioural decisions. A review of recent studies in the animal health literature shows that different social science frameworks and methodologies offer complementary insights into livestock managers’ behaviour but that the diversity of conceptual and methodological frameworks presents a challenge for animal health practitioners and policy makers who seek to make sense of the findings – and for researchers looking for helpful starting points. Data from a recent study in England illustrate the potential of ‘home-made’ conceptual frameworks to help unravel the complexity of farmer behaviour. At the same time, though, the data indicate the difficulties facing those designing communication strategies in a context where farmers believe strongly that they are already doing all they can reasonably be expected to do to minimise animal health risks.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Benjamin LA, Fosgate GT, Ward MP, Roussel AJ, Feagin RA, Schwartz AL (2010) Attitudes towards biosecurity practices relevant to Johne’s disease control on beef cattle farms. Preventive Veterinary Medicine 94:222–230
Boivin X, Marcantognini L, Boulesteix P, Godet J, Brule A, Veissier I (2007) Attitudes of farmers towards Limousin cattle and their handling. Animal Welfare 16:147–151
Cattaneo AA, Wilson R, Doohan D, LeJeune JT (2009) Bovine veterinarians’ knowledge, beliefs, and practices regarding antibiotic resistance on Ohio dairy farms. Journal of Dairy Science 92:3494–3502
Clausen PH, Bauer B, Zessin KH, Diall O, Bocoum Z, Sidibe I, Affognon H, Waibel H, Grace D, Randolph T (2010) Preventing and Containing Trypanocide Resistance in the Cotton Zone of West Africa. Transboundary and Emerging Diseases 57:28–32
Cross P, Williams P, Edwards-Jones G (2009) Differences in the perceptions of farmers and veterinary surgeons about the efficacy of mitigation strategies for controlling bluetongue. Veterinary Record 165:397–403
Delgado FE, Lima Wdos S, da Cunha AP, Bello AC, Domingues LN, Wanderley RP, Leite PV, Leite RC.
Da Fonseca Delgado FE, Lima, W.d.S., da Cunha, A.P., Passos de Paiva Bello, A.C., Domingues, L.N., Bispos Wanderley, R.P., Leite, P.V. and Leite, R.C., (2009) Cattle helminthiasis: farmers perception in Minas Gerais, Brazil. Revista Brasileira de Parasitologia Veterinaria 18:29–33
Dossa LH, Wollny C, Gauly M (2007) Smallholders’ perceptions of goat farming in southern Benin and opportunities for improvement. Tropical Animal Health and Production 39:49–57
Elbers ARW, Gorgievski-Duijvesteijn MJ, Van der Velden PG, Loeffen WLA, Zarafshani K (2010) A socio-psychological investigation into limitations and incentives concerning reporting a clinically suspect situation aimed at improving early detection of classical swine fever outbreaks. Veterinary Microbiology 142:108–118
Ellis-Iversen, J., Cook, A., Watson, E., Nielen, M, Larkin, L., Wooldridge, M. and Hogeveen, H., 2010. Circumstances and motivators that influence implementation of zoonotic control programs on cattle farms Preventive Veterinary Medicine 93: 276-285.
Garforth, C., Bailey, A., Tranter, R., Aikman, P., Allison, K., Taylor, N. and Wilsmore, T., 2011. Increasing the uptake of improved animal disease risk measures by animal keepers: attitudes, behaviours and practical lessons for responsibility and cost-sharing. Research report to Defra. Project FfG1013. University of Reading, 62pp.
Garforth C, Rehman T, McKemey K, Rana R (2005) Livestock Farmers’ Attitudes towards Consequential Loss Insurance Against Notifiable Diseases. School of Agriculture, Policy and Development, University of Reading, Final report of a research study commissioned by the Livestock Strategy Division of the UK Department for Environment Food and Rural Affairs, 83 pp
Garforth C, McKemey K, Rehman T, Tranter RB, Cooke R, Park J, Dorward P, Yates CM (2006) Farmers’ attitudes towards techniques for improving oestrus detection in dairy herds in South West England. Livestock Science 103:158–168
Green AL, Carpenter LR, Edmisson DE, Lane CD, Welborn MG, Hopkins FM, Bemis DA, Dunn JR (2010) Producer attitudes and practices related to antimicrobial use in beef cattle in Tennessee. Javma-Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association 237:1292–1298
Jansen J, Van Schaik G, Renes RJ, Lam T (2010a) The effect of a national mastitis control program on the attitudes, knowledge, and behavior of farmers in the Netherlands. Journal of Dairy Science 93:5737–5747
Jansen J, Steuten C, Renes R, Aarts N, Lam T (2010b) Debunking the myth of the hard-to-reach farmer: Effective communication on udder health. Journal of Dairy Science 93:1296–1306
Jansen J, Van den Borne B, Renes R, Van Schaik G, Lam T, Leeuwis C (2009) Explaining mastitis incidence in Dutch dairy farming: The influence of farmers’ attitudes and behaviour. Preventive Veterinary Medicine 92:210–223
Leach KA, Whay HR, Maggs CM, Barker ZE, Paul ES, Bell AK, Main DC (2010a) Working towards a reduction in cattle lameness: 1. Understanding barriers to lameness control on dairy farms Research in Veterinary Science 89:311–317
Leach KA, Whay HR, Maggs CM, Barker ZE, Paul ES, Bell AK, Main DC (2010b) Working towards a reduction in cattle lameness: 2. Understanding dairy farmers’ motivations Research in Veterinary Science 89:318–323
Noremark M, Lindberg A, Vagsholm I, Lewerin SS (2009) Disease awareness, information retrieval and change in biosecurity routines among pig farmers in association with the first PRRS outbreak in Sweden. Preventive Veterinary Medicine 90:1–9
Rehman T, McKemey K, Yates CM, Cooke RJ, Garforth CJ, Tranter RB, Rana R (2007) Identifying and understanding factors influencing the uptake of new technologies on dairy farms in SW England using the theory of reasoned action. Agricultural Systems 94:281–293
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2011 Wageningen Academic Publishers
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Garforth, C.J. (2011). Effective communication to improve udder health: can social science help?. In: Hogeveen, H., Lam, T.J.G.M. (eds) Udder Health and Communication. Wageningen Academic Publishers, Wageningen. https://doi.org/10.3920/978-90-8686-742-4_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3920/978-90-8686-742-4_4
Publisher Name: Wageningen Academic Publishers, Wageningen
Online ISBN: 978-90-8686-742-4
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)