Advertisement

System evaluation

Chapter
Part of the EAAP – European Federation of Animal Science book series (EAAP, volume 30)

Abstract

This chapter focuses on the evaluation of different aspects within the NorFor system. This includes sensitivity analyses with respect to feed characteristics and model tests of total tract digestion, milk production, the energy system for growing cattle, RLI, feed intake and chewing index.

Keywords

Prediction Error Milk Protein Degradation Characteristic Total Mixed Ration Grass Silage 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Aaes, O. 1991. Grøncobs som erstatning for kraftfoder til malkekøer. In: Foderværdi og anvendelse af kunsttørret grønfoder til malkekøer. Statens Husdyrbrugsforsøg, Denmark. 5–19. (In Danish).Google Scholar
  2. Aaes, O. 1993. Total mixed rations versus separate feeding of concentrate rich rations fed restrictively or ad libitum to dairy cows. Forskningsrapport no 16 fra Statens Husdyrbrugsforsøg, Denmark. (In Danish with English summary).Google Scholar
  3. Åkerlind, M., K. Holtenius, J. Bertilsson and M. Emanuelson, 1999. Milk composition and feed intake in dairy cows selected for high or low milk fat percentage. Livestock Production Science 59: 1–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Alne, J., 2000. Effects of duodenal starch and amino acid infusion on milk yield, protein content and utilization of feednitrogen in dairy cows. Master of Science Thesis. Agricultural University of Norway, Aas, Norway. (In Norwegian).Google Scholar
  5. Andersen, H.R. and J. Foldager, 1994. Protein requirement for replacement heifers in the period from 3 to 12 months of age. Forskningsrapport no. 26 fra Statens Husdyrbrugsforsøg, Denmark. (In Danish with English summary).Google Scholar
  6. Andersen, H.R., Foldager, J., Varnum, P.S. and T. Hvelplund, 1986. Forskellige proteinmængder og proteinkilder til kvieopdræt. Meddelelse no. 645 fra Statens Husdyrbrugsforsøg. (In Danish).Google Scholar
  7. Andersen, H.R., B.B. Andersen and H.G. Bang, 2001. Beef crossbreeding: Heifers versus bulls fed different concentrate/roughage ratio and slaughtered at different live weight. DJF rapport no. 28. (English summary).Google Scholar
  8. Aston, K, C. Thomas, R. Daley, J.D. Sutton and M.S. Dhanoa, 1994. Milk production from grass silage diets: effects of silage characteristics and the amount of supplementary concentrate. Animal Production 59: 31–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bertilsson, J., 2007. Agrodrank som foder till mjölkkor. Kungsängendagarna 2007. Rapport nr 267. Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala, Sweden. pp. 21–23. (In Swedish).Google Scholar
  10. Bertilsson, J., 2008. Effects of chop length of silage on chewing time, feed consumption and milk production. In: Hopkins, A., T. Gustafsson, J. Bertilsson, G. Dalin, N. Nilsdotter-Linde and E. Spörndly (eds.). Biodiversity and animal feed: Future challenges for grassland production. Grassland Science in Europe volume 13, Uppsala, Sweden, pp. 783–785.Google Scholar
  11. Bertilsson, J. and M. Murphy. 2003. Effects of feeding clover silages on feed intake, milk production and digestion in dairy cows. Grass and Forage Science 58: 309–322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Danfær, A., P. Huhtanen, P. Udén, J. Sveinbjörnsson and H. Volden, 2006. Karoline - A Nordic model for feed evaluation. Model description. In: Kebreab, E., J. Dijkstra, A. Bannink, J. Gerrits and J. France (eds.). Nutrient digestion and utilisation in farm animals: Modelling approaches. CAB International, Wallingford, UK, pp. 383–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Eriksson, T. 2010a. In vitro methods for indigestible Neutral Detergent Fiber (iNDF). Proceedings of the 1th Nordic Feed Science Conference, Report no. 274, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala, Sweden, pp. 41–45.Google Scholar
  14. Eriksson, T. 2010b. Nitrogen metabolism in dairy cows fed restricted amounts of grass-clover silage supplemented with seeds from narrow-leafed lupin or pea. Livestock Science 131: 39–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Eriksson, T., M. Murphy, P. Ciszuk and E. Burstedt, 2004. Nitrogen balance, microbial protein production. and milk production in dairy cows fed fodder beets and potatoes or barley. Journal of Dairy Science 87: 1057–1070.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Fox, D., G.L.O. Tedeschi, T.P. Tylutki, J.B. Russell, M.E. Van Amburgh, L.E. Chase, A.N. Pell and T.R. Overton. 2004. The Cornell Net Carbohydrate and Protein System model for evaluating herd nutrition and nutrient excretion. Animal Feed Science and Technology 112: 29–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Garmo, T.H., A.T. Randby, M. Eknaes, E. Prestløkken and P. Nørgaard, 2008. Effect of grass silage chop length on chewing activity and digestibility. In: Hopkins, A., T. Gustafsson, J. Bertilsson, G. Dalin, N. Nilsdotter-Linde and E. Spörndly (eds.). Biodiversity and animal feed: Future challenges for grassland production. Grassland Science in Europe, volume 13, pp. 810–812.Google Scholar
  18. Hymøller, L., M.R. Weisbjerg, P. Nørgaard, C.F. Børsting and N.B. Kristensen, 2005. Majsensilage til malkekøer. DJF rapport nr. 65. Danmarks Jordbrugsforskning. Foulum. Denmark. (In Danish).Google Scholar
  19. Ingvartsen, K.L., O. Aaes and J.B. Andersen, 2001. Effects of pattern of concentrate allocation in the dry period and early lactation on feed intake and lactational performance in dairy cows. Livestock Production Science 71: 207–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Ingvartsen, K.L., J. Foldager, J.B. Larsen and V. Østergaard, 1988. Growth and milk yield by Jersey reared at different planes of nutrition. Beretning no. 645 fra Statens Husdyrbrugsforsøg. (In Danish).Google Scholar
  21. Johansen, A., 1992. A comparison between meadow fescue and timothy silage. Doctor Scientarium Thesis. Agricultural University of Norway, Aas, Norway.Google Scholar
  22. Kristensen, V.F., 1999. Grovfoderkildens betydning for malkekoens produktion og fodereffektivitet. Temamøde Malkekøernes og kviernes ernæring April 1999. Statens Husdyrbrugsforsøg rapport 118, pp. 18–33. (In Danish).Google Scholar
  23. Larsen, M., N.B. Kristensen and T. Hvelplund, 2009a. Stivelsen til malkekøer - perspektivering af resultaterne fra stivelsesprojektet. In: Fodringsdag - Temadag om aktuelle fodringsspørgsmål. 1 September 2009. Dansk Kvæg, Århus, Denmark, pp. 54–61. (In Danish).Google Scholar
  24. Larsen, M., P. Lund, M.R. Weisbjerg and T. Hvelplund, 2009b. Digestion site of starch from cereals and legumes in lactating dairy cows. Animal Feed Science and Technology 153: 236–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Lund, P., M.R. Weisbjerg and T. Kristensen, 2004. The effect of heat treatment on degradability and microbial synthesis of protein in the rumen. Journal of Animal Feed Science 13: 143–146.Google Scholar
  26. Lund, P., 2002. The effect of forage type on passage kinetics and digestibility of fibre in dairy cows. Dissertation. The Royal Veterinary and Agricultural University, Department of Animal Science and Animal Health, Copenhagen, Denmark. 171 pp.Google Scholar
  27. Minde, A. and A.J. Rygh, 1997. Metoder for å bestemme nedbrytingshastighet, passasjehastighet og vomfordøyelighet av NDF hos mjølkeku. Masteroppgave. Norges Landbrukshøgskole. 118 pp. (In Norwegian).Google Scholar
  28. Misciattelli, L., V.F. Kristensen, M. Vestergaard, M.R. Weisbjerg, K. Sejrsen and T. Hvelplund, 2003. Milk production, nutrient utilization and endocrine responses to increased postruminal lysine and methionine supply in dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science 86: 275–286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Mitchell, P.L. 1997. Misuse of regression for empirical validation of models. Agricultural Systems 54: 313–326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Mo, M. and Å.T. Randby, 1986. Wilted silage for lactating dairy cows. Proceedings of 11th General Meeting of European Grassland Federation. Troia, Portugal, 4-9 May.Google Scholar
  31. Mogensen, L. and T. Kristensen, 2002. Effect of barley or rape seed cake as supplement to silage for high-yielding organic dairy cows. Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica. Section A - Animal Science 53: 243–252.Google Scholar
  32. Mogensen, L., P. Lund, T. Kristensen and M.R. Weisbjerg, 2008. Effects of toasting blue lupins, soybeans or barley as supplement for high-yielding organic dairy cows fed grass-clover silage ad libitum. Livestock Science 115: 249–257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Mould, F., 1996. Fôropptak og produksjon hos melkekyr ved et lavt PBV i rasjonen. Husdyrforsøksmøtet, pp. 121–127. (In Norwegian).Google Scholar
  34. Murphy, M., H. Khalili and P. Huhtanen, 1993. The substitution of barley by other carbohydrates in grass silage based diets to dairy cows. Animal Feed Science and Technology 41: 279–296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Murphy, M., M. Åkerlind and K. Holtenius, 2000. Rumen fermentation in lactating cows selected for milk fat content fed two forage to concentrate ratios with hay or silage. Journal of Dairy Science 83: 756–764.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Mäntysaari, P. 1993. The effects of feeding level and protein source of the diet on growth and development at slaughter of prepurbertal heifers. Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica Section A - Animal Science 43: 44–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Nielsen, N.I., N.C. Friggens, T. Larsen, J.B. Andersen, M.O. Nielsen and K.L. Ingvartsen, 2007. Effect of changes in diet energy density on feed intake, milk yield and metabolic parameters in dairy cows in early lactation. Animal 1: 335–346.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Nordang, L. and F. Mould, 1994. Surfôr med ulikt innhold av PBV til mjølkekyr. Husdyrforsøksmøtet, pp. 99–103. (In Norwegian).Google Scholar
  39. Nørgaard, P., E. Nadeau and A. Randby, 2010. A new Nordic structure evaluation system for diets fed to dairy cows: a meta analysis. In: Sauvant, D., J. Van Milgen, P. Faverdin and N. Friggens (eds.). Modelling nutrient digestion and utilization in farm animals. Wageningen Academic Publishers, Wageningen, the Netherlands, pp. 112–121.Google Scholar
  40. Olsson, K., I. Olsson and L. Lindell, 1984. Effect of the amount of roughage fed to heifers during the rearing period on feed consumption and milk production during the first lactation. Report no. 131. Swedish University of Agricultural SciencesGoogle Scholar
  41. Österman, S., 2003. Extended calving interval and increased milking frequency in dairy cows. Acta Universitatis Agriculturae Suecia. Agria 383. Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala, Sweden.Google Scholar
  42. Prestløkken, E., 1999. Protein value of expander-treated barley and oats for ruminants. Doctor Scientarium Thesis, Agricultural University of Norway, Aas, Norway. 137 pp.Google Scholar
  43. Prestløkken, E., Å.T. Randby, M. Eknæs and T. Garmo, 2007. Tidlig og normalt høstet gras. Opptak av surfôr og produksjon hos mjølkekyr. Husdyrforsøket, Thon Hotel Arena 14-15 February 2007, pp. 25–28. (In Norwegian).Google Scholar
  44. Randby, Å.T., 1992. Grass-clover silage for dairy cows. Proceedings of 14th General Meeting, European Grassland Federation, Lahti, Finland, 8-11 June, pp. 272–275.Google Scholar
  45. Randby, Å.T., 1997. Feeding of silage effluent to dairy cows. Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica Section A - Animal Science 47: 20–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Randby, Å.T., 1999a. Grass silage treated with two different acid-based additives for dairy cows. The Fifth International Symposium on the Nutrition of Herbivores. San Antonio, Texas, USA. 8 pp.Google Scholar
  47. Randby, Å.T., 1999b. Effect of increasing levels of a formic acid based additive on ad libitum intake of grass silage and the production of meat and milk. Proceeding of the XII International Silage Conference, Uppsala, Sweden, pp. 205–206.Google Scholar
  48. Randby, Å.T., 2000a. Round bale grass silage treated with an additive containing both lactic acid bacteria and formate for dairy cows and steers. Sixth British Grassland Society Research Conference, SAC, Craibstone, Aberdeen, Scotland, pp. 121–122.Google Scholar
  49. Randby, Å.T., 2000b. Effekten av økende dosering med et maursyreholdig ensileringsmiddel på næringsverdien av surfôret i produksjonsforsøk med kyr og kastrater. Hellerud Forsøksgård, Rapport nr. 25. 37 pp. (In Norwegian).Google Scholar
  50. Randby, Å.T., 2002. Silage fermentation by concentrate type interaction. Proceedings of the XIII International Silage Conference, Auchincruive, Scotland, pp. 312–313.Google Scholar
  51. Randby, Å.T., 2003. Høstetid og fôrkvalitet. Grønn kunnskap 7: 27–43. (In Norwegian).Google Scholar
  52. Randby, Å.T. 2007. Effect of propanol and dimethylsulphide in grass silage on organoleptic milk quality. Journal of Animal and Feed Science 16, Supplement 1: 102–107.Google Scholar
  53. Randby, Å. and M. Mo, 1985. Surfôr tilsatt foraform i sammenlikning med maursyresurfôr til melkekyr, Hellerud høsten 1984. M-141. Rapporter fra forsøksvirksomheten ved Institutt for husdyrernæring, pp. 75–78. (In Norwegian).Google Scholar
  54. Randby, Å.T. and I. Selmer-Olsen, 1997. Formic acid treated or untreated round bale grass silage for dairy cows. 8th International Symposium of Forage Conservation. Brno, Czech Republic, pp. 160–161.Google Scholar
  55. Randby, Å.T., I. Selmer-Olsen and L. Baevre, 1999. Effect of ethanol in feed on milk flavor and chemical composition. Journal of Dairy Science 82: 420–428.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Rinne M., P. Huhtanen and S. Jaakkola. 1997. Grass maturity effects on cattle fed silage-based diets. 2. Cell wall digestibility, digestion and passage kinetics. Animal Feed Science and Technology 67: 19–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Rinne M., S. Jaakkola, K. Kaustell, T. Heikkilä and P. Huhtanen, 1999a. Silage harvested at different stages of grass growth versus concentrate foods as energy and protein sources in milk production. Animal Science 69: 251–263.Google Scholar
  58. Rinne, M., S. Jaakkola, T. Varvikko and P. Huhtanen, 1999b. Effects of type and amount of rapeseed feed on milk production. Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica, Section A - Animal Science, 49: 137–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Rinne M., P. Huhtanen and S. Jaakkola. 2002. Digestive processes of dairy cows fed silages harvested at four stages of maturity. Journal of Animal Science 80: 1986–1998.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  60. Rustas, B.O., P. Nørgaard, A.R. Jalali and E. Nadeau, 2010. Effects of physical form and stage of maturity at harvest of whole-crop barley silage on intake, chewing activity, diet selection and faecal particle size of dairy steers. Animal 4: 67–75.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Sairanen, A., J.I. Nousiainen and H. Khalili, 1999. Korkean väkirehumäärän vaikutus maitotuotokseen ja tuotannon kannattavuuteen. In: Mitä Suomi syö - ja millä hinnalla? Agro-Food ‘99, Helsinki. pp. 7. (In Finnish).Google Scholar
  62. Selmer-Olsen, I., 1996. Microbial protein synthesis in the rumen of cows fed extensively or restricted fermented grass silage. Proceedings of the XIth International Silage Conference, Aberystwyth, Wales, pp. 226–227.Google Scholar
  63. Schei, I., H. Volden and L. Bævre, 2005. Effects of energy balance and metabolizable protein level on tissue mobilization and milk performance of dairy cows in early lactation. Livestock Production Science 95: 35–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Shingfield, K.J., A. Vanhatalo and P. Huhtanen, 2003. Comparison of heat-treated rapeseed expeller and solvent-extracted soya-bean meal as protein supplements for dairy cows given grass silage-based diets. Animal Science 77: 305–317.Google Scholar
  65. Steinshamn, H., L.T. Mydland, H. Volden and E. Thuen. 2006. The effect of red clover proportion in timothy silage on nitrogen utilization in lactating dairy cows. In: Wachendorf, M, Á. Helgadóttir and G. Parente (eds.). Sward dynamics. N-flows and forage utilisation in legume-based systems. Grado. Italy. 10-12 November. 2005. ESAAzienda regionale per lo sviluppo rurale, Italy, pp. 293–297.Google Scholar
  66. Thorhauge, M. and M.R. Weisbjerg, 2009. Effekt af fodring med mættet eller umættet fedt hos SDM-DH, RDM og Jersey. Kvæginfo no. 1938. Dansk Landbrugsrådgivning, Aarhus, Denmark. (In Danish).Google Scholar
  67. Thuen, E., 1989. Influence of source and level of dietary protein on milk yield, milk composition and some rumen and blood components in dairy cows. Doctor Scientarium Thesis. Agricultural University of Norway, as, Norway. 151 pp.Google Scholar
  68. Tothi, R, P. Lund, M.R. Weisbjerg and T. Hvelplund, 2003. Effect of expander processing on fractional rate of maize and barley starch degradation in the rumen of dairy cows estimated using rumen evacuation and in situ techniques. Animal Feed Science and Technology 104: 71–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Van Amburgh, M.E., D.G. Fox, D.M. Galton, D.E. Bauman and L.E. Chase, 1998. Evaluation of National Research Council and Cornell net carbohydrate and protein systems for predicting requirements of Holstein heifers. Journal of Dairy Science 81: 509–526.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Vestergaard, M., K.F. Jørgensen, I. Fisker, H.R. Andersen and K. Sejrsen, 2006. Forhøjet proteintildeling til store kvier - Resultater fra forsøg på Kvægbrugets ForsøgsCenter. In: Fodringsdag - Temadag om aktuelle fodringsspørgsmål. 29 august. Dansk Kvæg, pp. 41–45. (In Danish).Google Scholar
  71. Volden, H. 1990. Response of dietary AAT density on milk yield - Review of production trials in Norway. Proceedings of the seminar on fat and protein feeding to the dairy cow, 15-16 October, Eskilstuna, Sweden, pp. 81–89.Google Scholar
  72. Volden, H., 1999. Effects of level of feeding and ruminally undegraded protein on ruminal bacterial protein synthesis, escape of dietary protein, intestinal amino acid profile, and performance of dairy cows. Journal of Animal Science 77: 1905–1918.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  73. Volden, H. and O.M. Harstad, 2002. Effects of duodenal amino acid and starch infusion on milk production and nitrogen balance in dairy cows. Journal of Animal Science 80, Supplement 1. 321 pp.Google Scholar
  74. Volden, H.L., T. Mydland, V. Olaisen, 2002. Apparent ruminal degradation and rumen escape of soluble nitrogen fractions in grass, and grass silage administered intraruminally to lactating dairy cows. Journal of Animal Science 80: 2704–2716.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  75. Wallsten, J., J. Bertilsson, E. Nadeau and K. Martinsson, 2010. Digestibility of whole-crop barley and oat silages in dairy heifers. Animal 4-3: 432–438.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Weisbjerg, M.R. and K. Soegaard, 2008. Feeding value of legumes and grasses at different harvest times. In: Hopkins, A., T. Gustafsson, J. Bertilsson, G. Dalin, N. Nilsdotter-Linde and E. Sporndly (eds.). Biodiversity and animal feed: Future challenges for grassland production. Grassland Science in Europe, volume 13, pp. 513–515.Google Scholar
  77. Weisbjerg, M.R., 2007. Lucerneensilage til malkekøer - resultater fra nye forsøg. In: Fodringsdag - Temadag om aktuelle fodringsspørgsmål. 5–12. Dansk Kvæg, Aarhus, Denmark. (In Danish).Google Scholar
  78. Weisbjerg, M.R., L. Wiking, N.B. Kristensen and P. Lund, 2008. Effects of supplemental dietary fatty acids on milk yield and fatty acid composition in high and medium yielding cows. Journal of Dairy Research 75: 142–152.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Whitlock, B.K., M.J. Vandehaar, L.F.P. Silva and H.A.Tucker, 2002. Effect of dietary protein on prepurbertal mammary development in rapidly growing dairy heifers. Journal of Dairy Science 85: 1516–1525.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Wageningen Academic Publishers 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.TINE and the Norwegian University of Life SciencesAkershusNorway

Personalised recommendations