Abstract
This chapter introduces a number of concepts from Niklas Luhmann’s social systems theory as they relate to innovation, transition and transition management. An understanding of Luhmann’s ideas on innovation and steering is essential to grasp a Luhmannian view of system innovation and transition management. Two levels of analysis are developed. The first level centres on the political system, pushing innovation and trying to manage transition, while the second level focuses on organisations and their attempts to innovate. Luhmann is eminently useful in relating the two levels and thus in laying the groundwork for a theory of innovation and transition. An analysis of the development of Dutch discourse on systems innovation, social engineering and transition management since the 1990s serves to illustrate and apply the social systems perspective. Finally, the chapter argues that modernist notions of steering pervading the governance system overestimate the role of governmental actors and underestimate other sources of innovation and systemic innovation that could be labeled ‘transition’.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Allina-Pisano, J. (2008) Post Soviet Potemkin Villages: politics and property rights in the black earth. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
Avelino, F. and J. Rotmans (2009) Power in transition: an interdisciplinary framework to study power in relation to structural change. European Journal of Social Theory 12: 543–69.
Beunen, R., W. Van der Knaap and G. Biesbroek (2009) Implementation and integration of EU environmental directives: experiences from the Netherlands. Environmental Policy and Governance 19 (1): 56–73.
Borch, C. (2005) Systemic power: Luhmann, Foucault, and analytics of power. Acta Sociologica 48: 155–67.
Brunsson, N. (2002) The Organization of Hypocrisy: talk, decisions and actions in organizations. Copenhagen Business School Press, Oslo, Norway.
Burns, T. and G. Stalker (1961) The Management of Innovation. Tavistock, London, UK.
Collins, K. (2006) Clan Politics and Regime Transition in Central Asia. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.raoul.beunen@wur.nl
Czarniawska, B. (1997) Narrating the Organization: dramas of institutional identity. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL, USA.
Douglas, M. and A. Wildavsky (1982) Risk and Culture: an essay on the selection of technical and environmental dangers. University of California Press, Berkeley, CA, USA.
Duineveld, M., R. Beunen, K. Van Assche, R. During and R. Van Ark (2007) The Difference Between Knowing the Path and Walking the Path: een essay over het terugkerend maakbaarheidsdenken in beleidsonderzoek. Wageningen University, Wageningen, the Netherlands.
Duineveld, M., R. Beunen, K. Van Assche, R. During and R. Van Ark (2009) The relationship between description and prescription in transition research. In: K.J. Poppe, C. Termeer and M. Slingerland (eds.). Transitions Towards Sustainable Agriculture and Food Chains in Peri-Urban Areas. Wageningen Academic Publishers, Wageningen, the Netherlands, pp. 309–325.
During, R., K. Van Assche and A. Van der Zande (2009) Culture, innovation and governance in Europe: systems theories and the analysis of INTERREG programs. In: K.J. Poppe, C. Termeer and M. Slingerland (eds.). Transitions Towards Sustainable Agriculture and Food Chains in Peri-Urban Areas. Wageningen Academic Publishers, Wageningen, the Netherlands, pp. 163–189.
Elster, J., C. Offe and U. Preuss (1998) Institutional Design in Post-Communist Societies: rebuilding the ship at sea. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
Fuchs, S. (2001) Against Essentialism: a theory of culture and society. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA, USA.
Hendriks, C.M. and J. Grin (2007) Contextualizing reflexive governance: the politics of Dutch transitions to sustainability. Journal of Environmental Policy and Planning 9: 333–50.
Hernes, T. and H. Bakken (2002) Autopoietic Organization Theory. Copenhagen Business School Press, Oslo, Norway.
Jansson, D. (1989) The pragmatic uses of what is taken for granted: project leaders applications of investment calculus. International Studies of Management and Organization 19 (3): 49–63.
Kemp, R., D. Loorbach and J. Rotmans (2007) Transition management as a model for managing processes of co-evolution towards sustainable development. International Journal of Sustainable Development and World Ecology 14: 78–91.
King, M. and C. Tornhill (2003) Niklas Luhmann’s Theory of Politics and Law, Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.
King, M. and C. Tornhill (eds.) (2006) Luhmann on Law and Politics: critical appraisals and applications. Hart publishing, Oxford, UK.
Latour, B. (1987) Science in Action: how to follow scientists and engineers through society. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA, USA.
Latour, B. (2004) Politics of Nature: how to bring the sciences into democracy. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA, USA.
Ledeneva, A. (2005) How Russia Really Works. Cornell University Press, Ithica, NY, USA.
Ledeneva, A. (2007) Transition Management: new mode of governance for sustainable development. Erasmus University, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Loorbach D. (2007) Transition Management. New mode of governance for sustainable development. Erasmus University, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Luhmann, N. (1989) Ecological Communication. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL, USA.
Luhmann, N. (1995) Social Systems. Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA, USA.
Luhmann, N. (1990) Political Theory in the Welfare State. Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin, Germany.
Luhmann, N. (2002) Risk: a sociological theory. Aldine Transaction, New Brunswick, NJ, USA.
Luhmann, N. (2004) Law as a Social System. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK.
Luhmann, N. (2000) Organisation und Entscheidung. Westdeutscher Verlag, Opladen, Germany.
Maturana, H.R. and F.J. Varela (1987) The Tree of Knowledge: the biological roots of human understanding. Shambhala Publications, Boston, MA, USA.
Morgan, G. (1986) Images of Organization. Sage, Beverly Hills, CA, USA.
Poppe, K.J., C. Termeer and M. Slingerland (eds.) (2009) Transitions Towards Sustainable Agriculture and Food Chains in Peri-Urban Areas. Wageningen Academic Publishers, Wageningen, the Netherlands.
Pressman, J.L. and A.B. Wildavsky (1979) Implementation: how great expectations in Washington are dashed in Oakland. University of California Press, Berkeley, CA, USA.
Rotmans, J. (2000) Transities en Transitiemanagement: de casus van een emmisiearme energievoorziening. International Centre for Integrative Studies, Maastricht, the Netherlands.
Rotmans, J. (2003) Transitiemanagement: sleutel voor een duurzame samenleving. Van Gorcum, Assen, the Netherlands.
Rotmans, J., D. Loorbach, R. Van der Brugge (2005) Transitiemanagement en duurzame ontwikkeling: coevolutionaire sturing in het licht van complexiteit. Beleidswetenschap 19: 3–23.
Schiltz, M. (2007) Space is the place: the laws of form and social systems. Thesis Eleven 88 (1): 8–30.
Scott, J. (1998) Seeing Like a State. Yale University Press, New Haven, CT, USA.
Seidl, D. (2005) Organizational Identity and Self-transformation: an autopoietic perspective. Ashgate, Aldershot, UK.
Seidl, D. and K. Becker (eds.) (2005) Niklas Luhmann and Organization Studies. Copenhagen Business School, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Sievers, E. (2002) Uzbekistans mahalla: from Soviet to absolutist residential community associations. Journal of International and Comparative Law at Chicago Kent 2 (2): 91–150.
Simon, F. (2002) The deconstruction and reconstruction of authority and the role of management and consulting. Soziale Systeme 8: 283–93.
Teubner, G. (1996) Double bind: hybrid arrangements as de-paradoxifiers. Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics 152: 59–64.
Van Assche, K. (2004) Signs in Time: an interpretive account of urban planning and design, the people and their histories. Wageningen University, Wageningen, the Netherlands.
Van Assche, K. (2006) Over Goede Bedoelingen en Hun Schadelijke Bijwerkingen. Innovatienetwerk Groene Ruimte, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Van Assche, K. (2010) The good, the bad, and the self- referential: heritage planning and the quest for productive difference. In: T. Bloemers and A. Van der Valk (eds.). The cultural landscape and heritage paradox: Protection and development of the Dutch archaeological-historical landscape and its European dimension. Amsterdam University Press, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Van Assche, K. and H. Leinfelder (2008) Nut en noodzaak van een kritische planologie: suggesties vanuit Nederland en Amerika op basis van Niklas Luhmann’s systeemtheorie. Ruimte en Planning 28 (2): 28–38.
Van Assche, K. and G. Verschraegen (2008) The limits of planning: Niklas Luhmann’s social systems theory and the analysis of planning and planning ambitions. Planning Theory 7 (3): 263–83.
Van Assche, K., J. Salukvadze and G. Verschraegen (2010) Changing frames: expert and citizen participation in Georgian planning. Planning Practice and Research 25 (3): 377–395.
Verdery, K. (2003) The Vanishing Hectare: property and value in postsocialist Transsylvania. Cornell University Press, Ithica, NY, USA.
Weick, K. (1995) Sense-Making in Organizations. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA, USA.
Willke, H. (1994) Systemtheorie II: interventionstheorie. UTB, Stuttgart, Germany.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2011 Wageningen Academic Publishers
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
van Assche, K., Duineveld, M., Verschraegen, G., During, R., Beunen, R. (2011). Social systems and social engineering: Niklas Luhmann. In: Vellema, S. (eds) Transformation and sustainability in agriculture. Wageningen Academic Publishers, Wageningen. https://doi.org/10.3920/978-90-8686-717-2_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3920/978-90-8686-717-2_3
Publisher Name: Wageningen Academic Publishers, Wageningen
Online ISBN: 978-90-8686-717-2
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)