Abstract
Precision feeding is an agricultural concept that relies on the existence of between-animal variation and involves the use of feeding techniques that allow the right amount of feed with the right composition to be provided at the right time to each pig of the herd. Precision feeding is proposed as an essential approach to improve nutrient utilization and thus reduce feeding cost and nutrient excretion. The potential impact of using precision feeding techniques on feeding cost and nitrogen (N) and phosphorus (P) excretion was evaluated in this study. The growing pig module of InraPorc® was slightly modified and used to estimate lysine requirements and simulate growth of individual pigs and the overall population. Detailed information of body composition of individual pigs, feed intake and growth performance was used to calibrate the model. Simulated pigs were fed either according to a typical three-phase feeding program or individually with a daily tailored feed as could be provided using precision feeding techniques. Feeding cost was determined according to common commercial pig feeds sold in Quebec, Canada. As expected, simulated N and P retention was not affected (P>0.05) by the feeding method. However, feeding pigs with daily tailored diets reduced (P<0.001) N and P intake by 25% and 29%, respectively and nutrient excretions were reduced both by more than 38%. Feed cost was 10.5% lower for pigs fed daily tailored diets. In fact, population protein and P requirements were established to optimize average daily gain of the population. Estimated nutrient requirements did not include safety margins as normally used in commercial feeds and therefore, the simulated N and P reductions are probably underestimated. Phosphorus excretion should be interpreted with caution because actual models simulating P retention seldom take into account the effect of P intake in P retention and bone mineralisation. Precision feeding can be an efficient approach to significantly reduce feeding cost and the excretion of N and P in animal production systems.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Bourdon, D., Dourmad, J.Y. and Henry, Y., 1995. Réduction des rejets azotés chez les porcs en croissance par la mise en oeuvre de l’alimentation multiphase, associée a l’abaissement du taux azoté. Journées de la Recherche Porcine 27:269–278.
Brossard, L., Dourmad, J.-Y., Rivest, J. and Van Milgen, J., 2009. Modelling the variation in performance of a population of growing pig as affected by lysine supply and feeding strategy. Animal 3:1114–1123.
Hauschild, L., Pomar, C. and Lovatto, P.A., 2010. Systematic comparison of the empirical and factorial methods used to estimate nutrient requirements of growing pigs. Animal 4:714–723.
Honeyman, M.S., 1996. Sustainability issues of U.S. swine production. Journal of Animal Science 74:1410–1417.
Jean dit Bailleul, P., Bernier, J.F., van Milgen, J., Sauvant, D. and Pomar, C., 2000. The utilization of prediction models to optimize farm animal production systems: the case of a growing pig model. In: McNamara, J.P., France, J. and Beever, D. (eds.) Modelling Nutrient Utilization in Farm Animals. CAB International 2000, Wallingford, UK., pp.379–392.
Jondreville, C. and Dourmad, J.Y., 2005. Le phosphore dans la nutrition des porcs. Productions Animales 18:183–192.
Jongbloed, A.W. and Lenis, N.P., 1992. Alteration of nutrition as a means to reduce environmental pollution by pigs. Livestock Production Science 31:75–94.
Knap, P.W., 2000. Time trends of Gompertz growth parameters in ‘meat-type’ pigs. Animal Science 70:39–49.
Leclercq, B. and Beaumont, C., 2000. Etude par simulation de la réponse des troupeaux de volailles aux apports d’acides aminés et de protéines. Productions Animales 13:47–59.
Letourneau Montminy, M.-P., Boucher, C., Pomar, C., Dubeau, F. and Dussault, J.-P., 2005. Impact de la méthode de formulation et du nombre de phases d’alimentation sur le coût d’alimentation et les rejets d’azote et de phosphore chez le porc charcutier. Journées de la Recherche Porcine 37:25–32.
Patience, J.F., Engele, K., Beaulieu, A.D., Gonyou, H.W. and Zijlstra, R.T., 2004. Variation: costs and consequences. In: Ball, R.O. (ed.), Adv. Pork Prod. University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada, pp.257–266.
Pomar, C., 2007. Predicting responses and nutrient requirements in growing animal populations: the case of the growing-finishing pig. In: Hanigan, M.D., Novotny, J.A. and Marstaller, C.L. (eds.), Mathematical modeling in nutrition and agriculture. Virginia Polytechnic and State University, Blacksburg, VA., USA, pp.309–330.
Pomar, C., Hauschild, L., Zhang, G.H., Pomar, J. and Lovatto, P.A., 2009. Applying precision feeding techniques in growing-finishing pig operations Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia 38:226–237 (Supl. special).
Pomar, C., Kyriazakis, I., Emmans, G.C. and Knap, P.W., 2003. Modeling stochasticity: Dealing with populations rather than individual pigs. Journal of Animal Science (E. Suppl. 2):E178–E186.
Pomar, C., Pomar, J., Babot, D. and Dubeau, F., 2007. Effet d’une alimentation multiphase quotidienne sur les performances zootechniques, la composition corporelle et les rejets d’azote et de phosphore du porc charcutier. Journées de la Recherche Porcine 39:23–30.
Pomar, C. and Rivest, J., 1996. The effect of body position and data analysis on the estimation of body composition of pigs by dual energy x-ray absorptiometry (DEXA). Proceedings of the 46th annual conference of the Canadian Society of Animal Science (Abstr.), Lethbridge, Alberta, Canada, p. 26.
Rotz, C.A., 2004. Management to reduce nitrogen losses in animal production. Journal of Animal Science 82:E119–137.
Statistical Analysis Systems Institute, 1999. SAS/STAT Software, version 8. SAS Institute Incorporated., Cary, NC, USA.
Schinckel, A.P., Einstein, M.E., Foster, K. and Craig, B.A., 2007. Evaluation of the impact of errors in the measurement of backfat depth on the prediction of fat-free lean mass. Journal of Animal Science 85:2031–2042.
Van der Peet-Schwering, C.M.C., Jongbloed, A.W. and Aarnink, A.J.A., 1999. Nitrogen and phosphorus consumption, utilisation and losses in pig production: the Netherlands. Livestock Production Science 58:213–224.
Van Milgen, J., Valancogne, A., Dubois, S., Dourmad, J.-Y., Sève, B. and Noblet, J., 2008. InraPorc: A model and decision support tool for the nutrition of growing pigs. Animal Feed Science and Technology 143:387–405.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2011 Wageningen Academic Publishers
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Pomar, C., Hauschild, L., Zhang, G.H., Pomar, J., Lovatto, P.A. (2011). Precision feeding can significantly reduce feeding cost and nutrient excretion in growing animals. In: Sauvant, D., Van Milgen, J., Faverdin, P., Friggens, N. (eds) Modelling nutrient digestion and utilisation in farm animals. Wageningen Academic Publishers, Wageningen. https://doi.org/10.3920/978-90-8686-712-7_36
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3920/978-90-8686-712-7_36
Publisher Name: Wageningen Academic Publishers, Wageningen
Online ISBN: 978-90-8686-712-7
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)
