Advertisement

Comparing the ethics of capture fisheries and aquaculture

  • M. E. Lam

Abstract

The fish sector (wild or capture fisheries and aquaculture) is an important global source of food, income, livelihood, and culture. Aquaculture currently supplies 42% of the world fish production and is predicted to soon eclipse capture fisheries. The balance between these two production systems in supporting global seafood consumption has serious implications for food security, income distribution, ecosystem services, and overall sustainability. Here, the ethics and sustainability of capture fisheries and aquaculture will be analyzed and compared. An innovative practical ethics approach will be presented which adapts the ethical matrix, a conceptual tool that analyzes the welfare, freedom, and justice of different interest groups, and Rapfish, a semi-quantitative, rapid appraisal technique used to evaluate the sustainability of fisheries. In analyzing the ethics of seafood production and consumption, the roles of the law, market, and citizen are emphasized. Based on rapid appraisal case studies of large- and small-scale capture fisheries and carnivorous and omnivorous finfish aquaculture, it is argued that all three are essential for creating ethical and sustainable seafood production systems.

Keywords:

ethical matrix food security harm principle Rapfish sustainability 

References

  1. Allison, E.H., Ǻsgård, B. and Willmann, R. (2011). Editorial: human rights approaches to governing fisheries. MAST 10(2): 5-13.Google Scholar
  2. Allison, E.H., Ratner, B.D., Ǻsgård, B., Willmann, R., Pomeroy, R. and Kurien, J. (2012). Rights-based fisheries governance: from fishing rights to human rights. Fish and Fisheries 13(1): 14-29.Google Scholar
  3. Bene, C., Macfadayen, G. and Allison, E.H. (2007). Increasing the contribution of small-scale fisheries to poverty alleviation and food security. Fisheries and Aquaculture Technical Papers 481. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome, Italy, 141 pp.Google Scholar
  4. Chuenpagdee, R., Morgan, L.E., Maxwell, S.M. Norse, E.A. and Pauly, D. (2003). Shifting gears: assessing collateral impacts of fishing methods in U.S. waters. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 1(10): 517-524.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Coll, M., Libralato, S., Pitcher, T.J., Solidoro, C. and Tudela, S. (2012). Sustainability implications of honouring the Code of Conduct for Responsible Fisheries. Global Environmental Change 23: 157-166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. FAO. (1995). Code of conduct for responsible fisheries. FAO, Rome, Italy, 41 pp.Google Scholar
  7. FAO. (2005). Ethical issues in fisheries. FAO Ethics Series 4. FAO, Rome, Italy, 39 pp.Google Scholar
  8. Klinger, D. and Naylor, R. (2012). Searching for solutions in aquaculture: charting a sustainable course. Annual Review of Environment and Resources 37: 247-276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Lam, M.E. (2012). Of fish and fishermen: shifting societal baselines to reduce environmental harm in fisheries. Ecology and Society 17(4): 18 http://dx.doi.org/ 10.5751/ES-05113-170418.
  10. Lam, M.E. and Pauly, D. (2010). Who is right to fish? Evolving a social contract for ethical fisheries. Ecology and Society 15(3): 16. http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol15/iss3/art16.
  11. Lam, M.E. and Pitcher, T.J. (2012). The ethical dimensions of fisheries. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability 4: 364-373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Mepham, B. (2000). A framework for the ethical analysis of novel foods: the ethical matrix. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 12: 165-176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Mepham, B. (2008). Bioethics: an introduction for the biosciences. 2nd Edition. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK.Google Scholar
  14. Mepham, B. (2012a). Agricultural ethics. In: Chadwick, R. (ed.) Encyclopedia of applied ethics. 2nd edition. Vol 1. Academic Press, San Diego, CA, USA, p. 86-96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Mepham, B. (2012b). Food ethics. In: Chadwick, R. (ed.) Encyclopedia of applied ethics. 2nd edition. Vol 2. Academic Press, San Diego, CA, USA, p. 322-330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Naylor, R.L., Goldburg, R.J., Primavera, J., Kautsky, N., Beveridge, M.C.M., Clay, J., Folke, C., Lubchenco, J., Mooney, H. and Troell, M. (2001). Effects of aquaculture on world fish supplies. Nature 405: 1017-1024.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Pauly, D. (2006). Major trends in small-scale marine fisheries, with emphasis on developing countries, and some implications for the social sciences. MAST 4(2): 7-22.Google Scholar
  18. Pikitch, E., Boersma, P.D., Boyd, I.L., Conover, D.O., Cury, P., Essington, T., Heppell, S.S., Houde, E.D., Mangel, M., Pauly, D., Plaganyi, E., Sainsbury, K., and Steneck, R.S. (2012). Little fish, big impact: managing a crucial link in ocean food webs. Lenfest Ocean Program, Washington, DC, USA, 108 pp.Google Scholar
  19. Pitcher T.J. and Lam, M.E. (2010). Fishful thinking: rhetoric, reality, and the sea before us. Ecology and Society 15(2): 12. http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol15/iss2/art12.
  20. Pitcher, T.J. and Preikshot, D.B. (2001). Rapfish: a rapid appraisal technique to evaluate the sustainability status of fisheries. Fisheries Research 49(3): 255-270.Google Scholar
  21. Pitcher, T.J., Kalikoski, D, Pramod, G. and Short, K. (2009). Not honouring the Code. Nature 457: 658-659.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Pitcher, T.J., Lam, M.E., Ainsworth, C., Martindale, A., Nakamura, K., Perry, R.I. and Ward, T. (2013). Improvements to the ‘Rapfish’ rapid evaluation technique for fisheries: integrating ecological and human dimensions. Journal of Fish Biology (in press). http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1111/jfb.12122.
  23. Sumaila, U.R., Khan, A.S., Dyck, A.J., Watson, R., Munro, G., Tyedmers, P. and Pauly, D. (2010). A bottom-up re-estimation of global fisheries subsidies. Journal of Bioeconomics 12: 201-225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) (2012). Avoiding future famines: strengthening the ecological foundation of food security through sustainable food systems. UNEP, Nairobi, Kenya.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Wageningen Academic Publishers 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Fisheries CentreUniversity of British ColumbiaVancouverCanada
  2. 2.Department of BiologyUniversity of New MexicoxxxUSA
  3. 3.University of New MexicoAlbuquerqueUSA

Personalised recommendations