Do algae have moral standing? On exploitation, ethical extension and climate change mitigation

Abstract

Because global climate change is closely connected to the consumption of fossil fuels on which the western way of life is based, we experience the thought of changing our behaviour to mitigate climate change as a moral dilemma. Therefore, our hopes are on a ‘technological fix’, which appears to evade tricky moral questions by finding a clean source of energy. This paper explores moral issues underneath the unproblematic appearance of this turn by looking into the relations between technological fixes, exploitation, and ethical extension. With the advent of fossil fuels in the late 19th and 20th century, the labour needed to provide the beneficiaries of the economy with goods largely shifted from the proletariat to the ‘nature worker’, the natural inputs which are consumed with the production of goods. This shift led to the emancipation of the proletariat, but it turned out to be at the expense of the global ecosystem. We now try to find a more sustainable nature-worker in order to unburden the ecosystem and avert a climate crisis. This framing sheds new insight in the dynamics of ethical extension. While ethical extension is typically understood as an intellectual development, the ideas of moral considerability appear to co-evolve with technological development and the negative side-effects of exploitation. The extension of the moral community tends to coincide with the exploitation of a new object. This will in time lead to new issues which are only solvable by finding yet another object to exploit. This perspective leads us to conclude that while technological fixes appear to evade moral dilemmas, they merely shift them to another level. If we mitigate climate change by rebuilding the economy around highly efficient algae to produce fuel and base materials, we ought to look into the issues that may be on the horizon.

Keywords

moral community moral objects biotechnology exploitation 

References

  1. Alrøe, H.F. and Kristensen, E.S. (2003). Toward a systemic ethic: In search of an ethical basis for sustainability and precaution. Environmental ethics 25: 59–78.Google Scholar
  2. Carlson, R.H. (2010). Biology Is Technology: The Promise, Peril, and New Business of Engineering Life. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Druckman, A. and Jackson, T. (2009). The carbon footprint of UK households 1990–2004: A socio-economically disaggregated, quasi-multi-regional input-output model. Ecological Economics 68: 2066–2077.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Gardiner, S.M. (2006). A perfect moral storm: climate change, intergenerational ethics and the problem of moral corruption. Environmental Values 15: 397–413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Hopkins, E. (1982). Working Hours and Conditions during the Industrial Revolution: A Re-Appraisal. The Economic History Review 35: 52–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (2007). Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I. Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I.Google Scholar
  7. Kelle, A. (2007). Synthetic biology & biosecurity awareness in Europe. SYNBIOSAFE, IDC/University of Bath/University of Bradford, Vienna/Bath/Bradford.Google Scholar
  8. Leopold, A. (1949). A Sand County Almanac And Sketches Here and There. Oxford University Press Inc.Google Scholar
  9. Nash, R. (1989). The Rights of Nature: History of Environmental Ethics. University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
  10. Sloterdijk, P. (2007). What happened in the twentieth century? En route to a critique of extremist reason. Cultural Politics 3: 327–356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Wertheimer (2008). Exploitation. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. http ://plato.stanford.edu/entries/exploitation/.Accessed Feb 1st, 2012.Google Scholar
  12. Wijffels, R.H. and Barbosa, M.J. (2010). An Outlook on Microalgal Biofuels. Science 329: 796–799.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Wageningen Academic Publishers 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Methodical Ethics and Technology AssessmentWageningen UniversityWageningenthe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations