Advertisement

Land-use dynamics in enset-based agroforestry homegardens in Ethiopia

  • Tesfaye AbebeEmail author
  • Frans Bongers

Abstract

In many tropical countries homegardens sustain large numbers of people. Households depend for their livelihoods on the variety and continued production of food and other products that are provided by their own gardens. Such homegardens combine production with the maintenance of biodiversity. Long-term sustainability of the system is crucial for the long-term wellbeing of the population, including food security. The enset-coffee system of Southern Ethiopia is an example of such agroforestry homegardens. Enset is the main food crop and coffee is the main cash crop. We analysed the homegardens of 144 households covering a range of geographical conditions. Household wealth status was the main determinant of homegarden size. In total, 198 species of cultivated crops (78) and trees (120) were found. Enset and crops were represented by 42 and 24 cultivars respectively. The homegardens were covered by around one-third of enset and one-third of coffee. Enset provides the backbone of the system as it provides food security. Our results show that the stability of the system depends both on its diversity and on the specific characteristics of the two main crops, enset and coffee. The enset-coffee homegardens are changing as farmers increasingly make individual choices and respond to emerging challenges and opportunities. The dynamics of the agroforestry homegarden of Southern Ethiopia can be considered as a productive bricolage process on the micro scale.

Keywords

coffee Enset ventricosum Ethiopia livelihood agricultural intensification 

References

  1. Abdoellah, O.S., Hadikusumah, H.Y., Takeuchi, K., Okubo, S. and Parikesit, G.B. (2006). Commercialization of homegardens in an Indonesian village: vegetation composition and functional changes. In: Kumar B.M. and Nair P.K.R. (eds.) Tropical homegardens: a time-tested example of sustainable agroforestry. Springer Science, Dordrecht, the Netherlands, pp. 233–250.Google Scholar
  2. Abebe, T. (2005). Diversity in homegarden agroforestry systems of southern Ethiopia. Tropical Resource Management Paper No. 59, Wageningen University, Wageningen, the Netherlands, 143 pp.Google Scholar
  3. Abebe, T., Wiersum, K.F. and Bongers, F. (2010). Spatial and temporal variation in crop diversity in agroforestry homegardens of Southern Ethiopia. Agroforestry Systems 78: 309–322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Abebe, T., Wiersum, K.F., Bongers, F. and Sterck, F. (2006). Diversity and dynamics in homegardens of Southern Ethiopia. In: Kumar B.M. and Nair P.K.R. (eds.) Tropical homegardens: a time-tested example of sustainable agroforestry. Springer Science, Dordrecht, the Netherlands, pp. 87–103.Google Scholar
  5. Albuquerque, U.P., Andrade, L.H.C. and Caballero, J. (2005). Structure and floristics of homegardens in Northeastern Brazil. Journal of Arid Environments 62: 491–506.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Altieri, M.A. (1995). Agroecology: the science of sustainable agriculture (2nd ed). Westview Press, Boulder, CO, USA.Google Scholar
  7. Ashagari, D. (1984). Studies on the bacterial wilt of enset and prospects for its control. Ethiopian Agricultural research Conference, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.Google Scholar
  8. Blanckaert, I., Swennen, R.L., Paredes-Flores, M., Rosas-López, R. and Lira-Saade, R. (2004). Floristic composition, plant uses and management practices in home gardens of San Rafael Coxcotlaán, Valle of Tehuacán-Cuicatlán, Mexico. Journal of Arid Environments 57: 179–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bureau of Development and Economic Planning of Southern Nations, Nationalities and Peoples’ Regional State (BODEP) (1996). Regional Conservation Strategy, Volume 1. BODEP, Awassa, Ethiopia.Google Scholar
  10. Brandt, S.A., Spring, A., Hiebsch, C., McCabe, J.T., Tabogie, E., Diro, M., Wolde-Michael, G., Yntiso, G., Shigeta, M. and Tesfaye, S. (1997). The tree against hunger. American Association for the Advancement of Science, Washington D.C., 56 pp.Google Scholar
  11. Casas, A., Vázquez, M., Viveros, J. and Caballero, J. (1996). Plant management among the Nahua and the Mixtec in the Balsas River Basin, Mexico: an ethnobotanical approach to the study of plant domestication. Human Ecology 24: 455–478.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Cox, G.W. and Atkins, M.D. (1979). Agricultural ecology: an analysis of world food production systems. WH Freeman and Co., San Francisco, 721 pp.Google Scholar
  13. Engels, J.M.M. (2002). Home gardens - a genetic resource perspective. In: Watson, J.W. and Eyzaguirre P.B. (eds.) Proceedings of the second international home garden workshop. Bioversity International, Rome, Italy, pp. 3–9.Google Scholar
  14. Goddard, M.A., Dougill, A.J. and Benton, T.G. (2009). Scaling up from gardens: biodiversity conservation in urban environments. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 25: 90–98.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Godfray, H.C.J., Beddington, J.R., Crute, I.R., Haddad, L., Lawrence, D., Muir, J.F., Pretty, J., Robinson, S., Thomas, S.M. and Toulmin, C. (2010). Food security: the challenge of feeding 9 billion people. Science 327: 812–818.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Holden, E. and Linnerud, K. (2007). The sustainable development area: Satisfying basic needs and safeguarding ecological sustainability. Sustainable Development 15: 174–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hoogerbrugge, I.D. and Fresco, L.O. (1993). Homegarden systems: agricultural characteristics and challenges. Gatekeeper Series No. 39. International Institute for Environment and Development, London, UK.Google Scholar
  18. Kaya, M., Kammesheidt, L. and Weidelt, H.J. (2002). The forest garden system of Saparua Island, central Maluku, Indonesia, and its role in maintaining tree species diversity. Agroforestry Systems 54: 225–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Kumar, B.M. and Nair, P.K.R. (2004). The enigma of tropical homegardens. Agroforestry Systems 61: 135–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Kumar, B.M. and Nair P.K.R. (eds.) (2006). Tropical homegardens. A time-tested example of sustainable agroforestry. Springer, Dordrecht, the Netherlands.Google Scholar
  21. Makiso, T. (1975). A study on the yield of Enset. Proceedings of the 6th IAR Research Seminar. Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.Google Scholar
  22. Matson, P.A., Parton, W.J., Power, A.G. and Swift, M.J. (2002). Agricultural intensification and ecosystem properties. Science 277: 504.Google Scholar
  23. Mergen, F. (1987). Research opportunities to improve the production of homegardens. Agroforestry Systems 5: 57–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Montagnini, F. (2006). Homegardens of MesoAmerica: biodiversity, food security, and nutrient management. In: Kumar B.M. and Nair P.K.R. (eds.) Tropical homegardens: a time-tested example of sustainable agroforestry, Springer Science, Dordrecht, the Netherlands, pp. 233–250.Google Scholar
  25. Murdock, G.P. (1959). Africa: its peoples, their cultures and history. McGraw Hill, New York.Google Scholar
  26. Nair, P.K.R. (1993). An introduction to agroforestry. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, the Netherlands.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Nair, P.K.R. (2001). Do tropical homegardens elude science, or is it the other way around? Agroforestry Systems 53: 239–245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Negash, A. (2001). Diversity and conservation of enset (Ensete ventricosum Welw. Cheesman) and its relation to household food and livelihood security in South-western Ethiopia. PhD dissertation, Wageningen University, the Netherlands.Google Scholar
  29. Neher, D. (1992). Ecological sustainability in agricultural systems: Definition and measurement. Journal of Sustainable Agriculture 2: 51–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Netting, R.M.C. and Stone, M.P. (1996). Agrodiversity on a farming frontier: Kofyar smallholders on the Benue plains of Central Nigeria. Africa 66: 52–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Ojiem, J.O., De Ridder, N., Vanlauwe, B. and Giller, K.E. (2006). Socio-ecological niche: a conceptual framework for integration of legumes in smallholder farming systems. International Journal of Agricultural Sustainability 4: 79–93.Google Scholar
  32. Padoch, C. and Pinedo-Vasquez, M. (2010). Saving swidden to save biodiversity. Biotropica 42: 550–552.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Perfecto, I., Vandermeer, J. and Wright, E.L. (2009). Nature’s matrix: linking agriculture, conservation and food sovereignty. Earthscan Ltd., London, UK.Google Scholar
  34. Peyre, A., Guidal, A., Wiersum, K.F. and Bongers, F. (2006). Homegarden dynamics in Kerala, India. In: Kumar B.M. and Nair P.K.R. (eds.) Tropical homegardens: a time-tested example of sustainable agroforestry. Springer Science, Dordrecht, the Netherlands, pp. 87–103.Google Scholar
  35. Pijls, L.T.J., Timmer, A.A.M., Wolde-Gebriel Z. and West C.E. (1995). Cultivation, preparation and consumption of ensete (Ensete ventricosum) in Ethiopia. Journal of the Science and Food of Agriculture 67: 1–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Pretty, J.N., Morison, J.I.L. and Hine, R.E. (2003). Reducing food poverty by increasing agricultural sustainability in developing countries. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 95: 217–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Rahmato, D. (1995). Resilience and vulnerability: enset agriculture in Southern Ethiopia. Journal of Ethiopian studies 28: 23–51.Google Scholar
  38. Royal Society of London (2009). Reaping the benefits: science and sustainable intensification of global agriculture. Royal Society of London, London, UK.Google Scholar
  39. Shack, W.A. (1966). The Gurage: a people of enset culture. International African Institute, Oxford University Press, London, UK.Google Scholar
  40. Shank, R. and Ertiro, C. (1996). A linear model for predicting enset plant yield and assessment of Qocho production in Ethiopia. World Food Programme/SNNPRS/UNDP units for Ethiopia. Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.Google Scholar
  41. Swift, M.J. and Ingram, J.S.I. (eds.) (1996). Effects of global change on multi-species agroecosystems. Global Change and Teerrestrial Ecosystems, Report no. 13, GCTE Activity 3.4, GCTE Focus 3 Office, Wallingford, UK.Google Scholar
  42. Tesfaye, B. (2002). Studies on landrace diversity, in vivo and in vitro regeneration of enset (Enset ventricosum Welw.). PhD dissertation, Humboldt University, Berlin, Germany.Google Scholar
  43. Tilman, D., Cassman, K.G., Matson, P.A., Naylor, R. and Polasky, S. (2002). Agricultural sustainability and intensive production practices. Nature 418: 671–677.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Trenbath, B.R. (1999). Multispecies cropping systems in India: Predictions of their productivity, stability, resilience and ecological sustainability. Agroforestry Systems 45: 61–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Tsegaye, A. (2002). On indigenous production, genetic diversity and crop ecology of enset (Enset ventricosum (Welw.) Cheesman). PhD dissertation, Wageningen University, Wageningen, the Netherlands.Google Scholar
  46. Vandermeer, J., Van Noordwijk, M., Anderson, J., Ong, C. and Perfecto, I. (1998). Global change and multispecies agroecosystems: concepts and issues. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 67: 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Wiersum, K.F. (1982). Tree gardening and Taungya on Java: examples of agroforestry techniques in the humid tropics. Agroforestry Systems 1: 53–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Wiersum, K.F. (2006). Diversity and change in homegarden cultivation in Indonesia. In: Kumar B.M. and Nair P.K.R. (eds.) Tropical homegardens: a time-tested example of sustainable agroforestry. Springer Science, Dordrecht, the Netherlands, pp. 233–250.Google Scholar
  49. Wiersum, K.F. and Gonzalez, I.C.G. (2000). Intermediate forest types as nature - human systems: characteristics and future potential. Paper presented at the international workshop ‘Cultivating in tropical forests, the evolution and sustainability of intermediate systems between extractivism and plantations’, June 28-July 1, 2000, Lofoten, Norway.Google Scholar
  50. Wojtkowski, P.A. (1993). Toward an understanding of tropical homegardens. Agroforestry Systems 24: 215–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Woldetensaye, A. (1997). The ecology and production of Ensete ventricosum. Doctoral thesis, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala, Sweden.Google Scholar
  52. World Food Programme (1991). Manual on food nutritional status. World Food Programme, Rome, Italy.Google Scholar
  53. Yentiso, G. (1996). Economic and socio-cultural significance of enset among the Ari of Southwest Ethiopia. In: Abate, T., Hiebsch, C., Brandt, S.A. and Gebremariam, S. (eds.) Enset-based sustainable agriculture in Ethiopia. Institute of Agricultural Research, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Wageningen Academic Publishers 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.College of AgricultureHawassa UniversityHawassaEthiopia
  2. 2.Centre for Ecosystem StudiesWageningen University and Research CentreWageningenthe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations