Skip to main content

The role of sensor measurements in treating mastitis on farms with an automatic milking system

  • Chapter
Udder Health and Communication
  • 1196 Accesses

Abstract

Mastitis detection is aimed at finding cows with clinical mastitis (CM) so they can be treated. Farmers with an automatic milking system (AMS) rely on mastitis alert lists, generated by the AMS, to detect cows with CM. These lists are based on sensor measurements collected during milking. Mastitis detection models with sufficiently high sensitivity and specificity will help to select the CM cases that need treatment. The current CM detection performance can be summarized with a sensitivity of 36.8% and a specificity of 97.9%. These values don’t meet the suggested requirements on CM detection performance (sensitivity >70%, specificity >99%). Recent research was able to improve detection performance by using better detection algorithms, adding non-sensor information, and using new or improved sensors. The achieved sensitivity and specificity, however, were still not perfect. This imperfection may be explained by the fact that the majority of the alerts are from cows with intramammary infections. Some of these cows will develop CM, but the majority will not become clinically infected. Therefore, reaching a very high specificity (e.g. 100%) for CM detection is very difficult, and it is expected that future CM detection models on an AMS will not be perfect. As a consequence, farmers with AMS have to accept that not all CM cases will be detected, that some cases will be detected late, and that there will be false-positive alerts. With this inevitable imperfect detection in mind, it is essential to start thinking about detection and treatment protocols for farmers with AMS. These protocols may include specific actions for new alerts and for alerts which are on the list for weeks. This paper can be seen as a starting point for a further debate on providing treatment protocols for farmers with AMS.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 139.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Cavero D, Tolle KH, Buxade C, Krieter J. Mastitis detection in dairy cows by application of fuzzy logic. Livestock Science. 2006;105:207–213.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cavero D, Tolle KH, Henze C, Buxade C, Krieter J. Mastitis detection in dairy cows by application of neural networks. Livestock. Science.. 2008;114:280–286.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Claycomb RW, Johnstone PT, Mein GA, Sherlock RA. An automated in-line clinical mastitis detection system using measurement of conductivity from foremilk of individual udder quarters. New Zealand Veterinary Journal. 2009;57:208–214.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • De Mol RM, Ouweltjes W. Detection model for mastitis in cows milked in an automatic milking system. Preventive Veterinary Medicine. 2001;49:71–82.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • De Koning CJAM. Automatic milking - Common practice on dairy farms. Toronto, Canada: Proceedings of the first North American Conference on Precision Dairy Management; 2010. p. 52–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friggens NC, Chagunda MGG, Bjerring M, Ridder C, Hojsgaard S, Larsen T. Estimating degree of mastitis from time-series measurements in milk: A test of a model based on lactate dehydrogenase measurements. Journal of Dairy Science. 2007;90:5415–5427.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hogeveen H, Ouweltjes W. Sensors and management support in high-technology milking. Journal of Animal Science. 2003;81:1–10.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hogeveen H, Kamphuis C, Steeneveld W, Mollenhorst H. Sensors and clinical mastitis – the quest for the perfect alert. Sensors. 2010;10:7991–8009.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Keefe, G., McCarron, J., MacDonald, K. and Cameron, M., 2010. The scientific bases for using on-farm culture systems. Proceedings of the 49th Annual Meeting of the National Mastitis Council. Alberquerque, New Mexico, pp. 141-148.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kamphuis C, Sherlock R, Jago J, Mein G, Hogeveen H. Automatic detection of clinical mastitis is improved by in-line monitoring of somatic cell count. Journal of Dairy Science. 2008;91:4560–4570.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kamphuis C, Mollenhorst H, Heesterbeek JAP, Hogeveen H. Detection of clinical mastitis with sensor data from automatic milking systems is improved by using decision-tree induction. Journal of Dairy Science. 2010;93:3616–3627.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mein, G.A. and Rasmussen, M.D., 2008. Performance evaluation of systems for automated monitoring of udder health: would the real gold standard please stand up? In: Lam, T.J.G.M. (ed.) Mastitis Control – From science to practice. Wageningen Academic Publishers, Wageningen, the Netherlands, pp. 259-266.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mollenhorst, H. and Hogeveen, H., 2008. Detection of changes in homogeneity of milk. Internal report. Department of Farm Animal Health, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neijenhuis, F., Heinen, J. and Hogeveen, H., 2009. Automatic milking: risk factors for the udder health status, report 257 (in Dutch). Wageningen UR Livestock Research, Lelystad, the Netherlands

    Google Scholar 

  • Quinlan JR. Induction of decision trees. Machine Learning. 1986;1:81–106.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sherlock R, Hogeveen H, Mein G, Rasmussen MD. Performance evaluation of systems for automated monitoring of udder health: Analytical issues and guidelines. In: Lam TJGM, editor. Mastitis control – from science to practice. Wageningen, The Netherlands: Wageningen Acadamic Publishers; 2008. p. 275–282.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steeneveld W, Hogeveen H, Barkema HW, Van den Broek J, Huirne RBM. The influence of cow factors on the incidence of clinical mastitis in dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science. 2008;91:1391–1402.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Steeneveld, W., 2010. Decision support for mastitis on farms with an automatic milking system. PhD-dissertation, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steeneveld W, Van der Gaag LC, Barkema HW, Hogeveen H. Simplify the interpretation of alert lists for clinical mastitis in automatic milking systems. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture. 2010a;71:50–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steeneveld W, Van der Gaag LC, Ouweltjes W, Mollenhorst H, Hogeveen H. Discriminating between true-positive and false-positive clinical mastitis alerts from automatic milking systems. Journal of Dairy Science. 2010b;93:2559–2568.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Van den Borne BHP, Halasa T, Van Schaik G, Hogeveen H, Nielen M. Bio-economic modeling of lactational antimicrobial treatment of new bovine subclinical intramammary infections caused by contagious pathogens. Journal of Dairy Science. 2010;93:4034–4044.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to W. Steeneveld .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Wageningen Academic Publishers

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Steeneveld, W., Kamphuis, C., Mollenhorst, H., van Werven, T., Hogeveen, H. (2011). The role of sensor measurements in treating mastitis on farms with an automatic milking system. In: Hogeveen, H., Lam, T.J.G.M. (eds) Udder Health and Communication. Wageningen Academic Publishers, Wageningen. https://doi.org/10.3920/978-90-8686-742-4_76

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics