Skip to main content

Fire and Explosion Safety Assessment in Container Line Supply Chain

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Decision Aid Models for Disaster Management and Emergencies

Part of the book series: Atlantis Computational Intelligence Systems ((ATLANTISCIS,volume 7))

  • 2451 Accesses

Abstract

Safety assessment is an important part of maritime safety analysis and management as it can provide decision support to safety-based operations. In this chapter, we first review fire and explosion safety related regulations and assessment approaches, and then present a hierarchical assessment framework for evaluating safety against fire and explosion hazards in container line supply chain (CLSC).Main criteria and factors influencing fire and explosion safety on containerships are investigated, and a safety modeling and synthesis method using the Evidential Reasoning (ER) approach is briefly discussed. The outcomes generated by the proposed safety assessment method are highly consistent with “goal-setting” safety regulations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. DHS (2007). Strategy to enhance international supply chain security. Department of Homeland Security.

    Google Scholar 

  2. EMSA (2008). Maritime Accident Review 2008. European Maritime Safety Agency.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Franks A., G. Hughes, S. Hanif (2000). A comparison of accident experience with quantitative risk assessment methodology, Health and Safety Executive, HSE Books.

    Google Scholar 

  4. HSE (1995). Offshore Installations – Prevention of Fire and Explosion, and Emergency Response (PFEER) on Regulations 1995 (2nd ed.). Health and Safety Executive, HSE Books.

    Google Scholar 

  5. HSE (2001). Marine risk assessment. HSE offshore technology report 2001/063.

    Google Scholar 

  6. HSE (2002). A safety based decision support system for the design of large offshore engineering products. HSE offshore technology report 2002/08.

    Google Scholar 

  7. IMO (2000). International Convention for the Safety of Life at Sea (SOLAS). International Maritime Organization.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Liu J., Yang J.B., Ruan D., Martinez L. and Wang J., (2008). Self-tuning of fuzzy belief rule bases for engineering system safety analysis, Annals of Operations Research, 163 (1): 143–168.

    Google Scholar 

  9. MAIB (2008). Annual Report 2008. Marine Accident Investigation Branch.

    Google Scholar 

  10. RAND (2003). Maarten van de Voort, Kevin A. O’Brien, Seacurity: Improving the Security of the Global Sea-Container Shipping System. Rand Europe.

    Google Scholar 

  11. UKOOA (2003). Fire and Explosion Guidance Part 0: Fire and Explosion HazardManagement. UK Offshore Operators Association.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Vinnem J.E. (2007). Offshore risk assessment: principles, modelling and applications of QRA studies (2nd edition). Springer series in reliability engineering, Kluwer Academic Publishers, The Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Wang J., (2000). A subjective modelling tool applied to formal ship safety assessment. Ocean Engineering 27: 1019–1035.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Wang J. (2001). The current status and future aspects in formal ship safety assessment. Safety Science 38: 19–30.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Wang J. (2002). Offshore safety case approach and formal safety assessment of ships. Journal of Safety Research, 33: 81–115.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Wang Y.M., Yang J.B., Xu D.L. (2006). Environmental Impact Assessment Using the Evidential Reasoning Approach. European Journal of Operational Research, 174 (3), 1885–1913.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Xu D.L., Yang J.B. (2003). Intelligent Decision Systemfor Self-Assessment. Journal of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis 12, 43–60.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Yang J.B., Singh M.G. (1994). An evidential reasoning approach for multiple attribute decision making with uncertainty. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics 24 (1), 1–18.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Yang J.B. (2001). Rule and utility based evidential reasoning approach for multiple attribute decision analysis under uncertainty. European Journal of Operational Research 131 (1), 31–61.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Yang J.B., Xu D.L. (2002). On the evidential reasoning algorithm for multiattribute decision analysis under uncertainty. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics - Part A: Systems and Humans 32 (3), 289–304.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work forms part of the project supported by the UK Engineering and Physical Science Research Council under Grant No.: EP/F024606/1.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dawei Tang .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Atlantis Press

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Chen, Yw., Xu, DL., Yang, JB., Tang, D. (2013). Fire and Explosion Safety Assessment in Container Line Supply Chain. In: Vitoriano, B., Montero, J., Ruan, D. (eds) Decision Aid Models for Disaster Management and Emergencies. Atlantis Computational Intelligence Systems, vol 7. Atlantis Press, Paris. https://doi.org/10.2991/978-94-91216-74-9_13

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.2991/978-94-91216-74-9_13

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Atlantis Press, Paris

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-91216-73-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-91216-74-9

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Societies and partnerships