Skip to main content

The Effect of Dynamic Capabilities on International Performance of Chinese Universities

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management 2016
  • 2298 Accesses

Abstract

This paper seeks to apply the dynamic capabilities framework to examine the internationalization of higher education, specifically, the effect of dynamic capabilities on university’s international performance. An empirical data analysis has been employed, and hypotheses are tested on Chinese 985 and 211 universities. The results indicate that dynamic capabilities have a significant positive effect on the university’s international performance. In particular, learning mechanisms has the most prominent positive effect on university’s international performance. Universities must be fully aware of the importance of dynamic capabilities when dealing with the rapidly changing environment, and should develop the university’s international dynamic capabilities especially their learning mechanisms to enhance their international performance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Huang, F. Internationalisation of higher education in the era of globalisation: What have been its implications in China and Japan? [J]. Higher Education Management and Policy, 2007, 19 (1): 1–15.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Knight, J. Monitoring the quality and progress of internationalization [J]. Journal of Studies in International Education, 2001(5): 228–243.

    Google Scholar 

  3. de Wit, H. On the Definition of International Education [J]. European Association for International Education Newsletter, 1993 (11): 7–10.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Knight, J. Updated internationalization definition [J]. International Higher Education, 2003 (33): 2–3.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Harari, M. Internationalization of Higher Education, Effecting Institutional Change in the Curriculum and Campus. Long Beach, California: Center for International Education, California State University, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Knight, J. Internationalization Remodeled: Rationales, Strategies and Approaches [J]. Journal for Studies in International Education, 2004, 8(1): 5–31.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Altbach, P. G., Knight, J. The Internationalization of Higher Education: Motivations and Realities [J]. Journal of Studies in International Education, 2007(11): 290–307.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Altbach, P. G. Trends in Comparative Education [J]. Comparative Education Review, 1991, 35(3): 491-507.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Davies, J. D. University strategies for internationalisation in different institution and cultural settings: A conceptual framework, in Policy and policy implantation in internationalization of higher education, 1995: 3–18.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Liu, Y. H., Wang, Q. L. University International Consortium: A New Choice of Chinese University Internationalization Strategies [J]. Journal of Beijing Institute of Technology (Social Sciences Edition), 2012 (6): 150–153.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Campbell, J. L. and Lindberg, L. N. The Evolution of Governance Regimes. pp. 319-355 in Governance of the American Economy [M]. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Kane, M. B., Mitchell, R. Implementing performance assessment: Promises, problems, and challenges [M]. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Brumbrach. Performance management [M]. London: The Cronwell Press, 1988:15.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Teece, D. J. Explicating dynamic capabilities: the nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance [J]. Strategic Management Journal, 2007, 28(13): 1319–1350.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Makadok, R. Toward a synthesis of the resource-based and dynamic-capability views of rent creation [J]. Strategic Management Journal, 2001, 22(5): 387–401.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Hitt, M.A., Bierman, Shimizu, K., Kochhar, R. Direct and Moderating effects of human capital on strategy and performance in professional service firms: a resource-based perspective. Academy of Management journal, 2001, 44(l): 13–28.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Zollo, M., Winter, S. Deliberate learning and the evolution of dynamic capabilities [J]. Organization Science, 2002, 13(3): 339–351.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Caloghirou, Y., Protogerou, A., Spanos, Y., Papagiannakis, L. Industry-Versus Firm-specific Effects on Performance: Contrasting SMEs and Large-sized Firms [J]. European Management Journal, 2004, 22(2): 231–243.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Barreto, I. Dynamic Capabilities: A Review of Past Research and an Agenda for the Future [J]. Journal of Management, Jan 2010, 36(1): 256–280.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Yang, F. L. A Study on the Development and Management of Internationalization of Higher Education [D]. Tianjin: Tianjing University, 2011: 1–122.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Ding, S. C. The Study on Motivation, Pattern and Performance of Internationalization about Research Universities in China [D]. Anhui: University of Science and Technology of China, 2014: 1–133.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Galunic, D. C., Rodan, S. Resource recombination in the firm: Knowledge structures and the potential for Schumpeterian innovation [J]. Strategic Management Journal, 1998, 19(12): 1193–1201.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Kogut, B., Zander, U. What firms do? Coordination, identity, and learning [J]. Organization Science, 1996, 7(5): 502–518.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Helfat, C. E., Eisenhardt, K. M. Inter-temporal Economies of Scope, Organizational Modularity, and the Dynamics of Diversification [J]. Strategic Management Journal, 2004, 25(13): 1217–1232.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Itami, H., Roehl, T. Mobilizing Invisible Assets [M]. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Eisenhardt, K., Martin, J. Dynamic capabilities: what are they? [J]. Strategic Management Journal, 2000, 21(10–11): 1105–1121.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Caloghirou, Y., Protogerou, A., Spanos, Y., Papagiannakis, L. Industry-Versus Firm-specific Effects on Performance: Contrasting SMEs and Large-sized Firms [J]. European Management Journal, 2004, 22(2): 231–243.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Cao, H.J., Zhao, J.B., Wang, Y. H. Dimensions of dynamic capabilities and path analysis: an empirical research based on China enterprise [J]. Study in Science of Science, 2009, 27(1): 36–44.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dan Xiang .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Atlantis Press and the author(s)

About this paper

Cite this paper

Xiang, D. (2017). The Effect of Dynamic Capabilities on International Performance of Chinese Universities. In: Qi, E., Shen, J., Dou, R. (eds) Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management 2016. Atlantis Press, Paris. https://doi.org/10.2991/978-94-6239-255-7_49

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.2991/978-94-6239-255-7_49

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Atlantis Press, Paris

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-6239-254-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-6239-255-7

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics