Skip to main content

Abstract

Loss function approach is effective for multi-response optimization. However, previous loss function approach ignore model uncertainty and decision-makers’ regret effect when determining the optimal input settings. In this paper, an overall loss function is proposed to optimize correlated multiple responses via confidence intervals, and we refer to the idea of worst case strategy used in decision theory to incorporate model uncertainty and decision makers’ regret effect into the loss function. The new loss function is composed of three sub-functions: expect performance, robustness performance, and regret performance, through which model uncertainty and regret effect are quantified. It is found that the traditional loss function will be a special case of the proposed approach if engineers could collect sufficient experimental data to estimate model parameters. An example is employed to illustrate the effectiveness of the proposed approach. The results show that the proposed approach can achieve reliable optimal operating conditions in comparison with those of traditional loss function approach.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 139.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 179.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. D.W. Apley, J. Kim, “A cautious approach to robust design with model parameter uncertainty”, IIE Transactions, vol. 43, no. 7, pp. 471-482, 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  2. J. J. Pignatiello, “Strategies for robust multiresponse quality engineering”, IIE Transactions, vol. 25, no.3, pp. 5-15, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  3. G. G. Vining, “A compromise approach to multiresponse optimization”, Journal of Quality Technology, 30, 4, pp. 309-313, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  4. G.Taguchi, E. A.Elsayed, C.H. Thomas, “Quality engineering in production systems”, McGraw-Hill College, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  5. E. A.Elsayed, A. Chen, “Optimal levels of process parameters for products with multiple characteristics”, International Journal of Production Research, vol. 31, no. 5, pp. 1117-1132, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  6. J. S. R. Jayaram, Y. Ibrahim, “Multiple response robust design and yield maximization”, International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management , vol. 16, no 9, pp. 826-837, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  7. F. C. Wu, C. C. Chyu, “Optimization of robust design for multiple quality characteristics”, International Journal of Production Research, vol. 42, no. 2, pp. 337-354, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Y. H. Ko, K. J. Kim, C. H. Jun, “A new loss function-based method for multiresponse optimization”, Journal of Quality Technology, vol. 37, no. 1, pp. 50-59, 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  9. O. Köksoy, S. K. S. Fan, “An upside-down normal loss function-based method for quality improvement”, Engineering Optimization, vol. 44, no. 8, pp. 935-945, 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  10. J. J. Peterson, C. Suntara, E. Del Castillo, “A general approach to confidence regions for optimal factor levels of response surfaces”, Biometrics, vol. 58, no. 2, pp. 422-431, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  11. C. H. Chiao, M. Hamada, “Analyzing experiments with correlated multiple responses”, Journal of Quality Technology, vol. 33, no. 4, pp. 451-465, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  12. J. J. Peterson, “A posterior predictive approach to multiple response surface optimization”, Journal of Quality Technology, vol. 36, no. 2, pp. 139-153, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  13. S. Zhang, P. Zhu, W. Chen, P. Arendt, “Concurrent treatment of parametric uncertainty and metamodeling uncertainty in robust design”, Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, vol. 47, no. 1, pp. 63-76, 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  14. T. Erfani, S. V.Utyuzhnikov, “Control of robust design in multiobjective optimization under uncertainties”, Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, vol. 45, no. 2, pp. 247- 256, 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Z. He, P. F. Zhu, S. H. Park, “A robust desirability function method for multi-response surface optimization considering model uncertainty”, European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 221, no. 1, pp. 241-247, 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  16. R. Rajagopal, E. Del Castillo, “Model-robust process optimization using Bayesian model averaging”, Technometrics, vol. 47, no. 2, pp. 152-163, 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  17. S. H. Ng, “A Bayesian-model averaging approach for multiple-response problem”, Journal of Quality Technology, vol. 42, no. 1, pp. 52-68, 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  18. X. J. Zhou, Y. Z Ma, Y. L.Tu, Y. Feng, “Ensemble of surrogates for dual response surface modeling in robust parameter design”, Quality and Reliability Engineering International, vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 173-197, 2013.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was partially supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China under grant Nos. 71371099 and 71211140350, and colleges and universities in Jiangsu Province plans to graduate research and innovation projects (CXZZ13_0226), which are gratefully acknowledged by the authors.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yi-zhong Ma .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Atlantis Press and the authors

About this paper

Cite this paper

Ouyang, Lh., Ma, Yz., Huang, Tt., Wang, Jj. (2015). Optimization of Multiple Responses Considering both Model Uncertainty and Regret Effect. In: Qi, E., Su, Q., Shen, J., Wu, F., Dou, R. (eds) Proceedings of the 5th International Asia Conference on Industrial Engineering and Management Innovation (IEMI2014). Proceedings of the International Asia Conference on Industrial Engineering and Management Innovation, vol 1. Atlantis Press, Paris. https://doi.org/10.2991/978-94-6239-100-0_14

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics