Advertisement

Environmental Aspects of Red Mud and Its Utilization as a Component of Building Materials

  • Gordana Topličić-Ćurčić
  • Vojislav Mitic
  • Dušan Grdić
  • Nenad Ristić
  • Zoran Grdić
Conference paper

Abstract

The Bayer process is the main industrial process covering 90 % of global production of alumina. The sintering process deals with the medium and low grades of bauxite resource. During the alumina production process, red mud is generated as a waste rock which consists of: hematite, Goethite, quartz, boehmite, calcite, tricalcium aluminate, zinc and magnesium oxides, sodium hydroxide etc. Due to high viscosity of the mud, prior to transport to the waste industrial water is added in the share of 10–15 % prior to transport to the waste disposal dump so that the pipeline transport would be facilitated. What makes red mud a hazardous pollutant is the alkaline liquid phase (Zlatičanin et al. in Prot Mater 53:292–298, 2012, Paramguru et al. Extr Metall Rev 26:1–29, 2005) [1, 2]. From the aspect of stored quantities, red mud represents a significant environmental problem (Zlatičanin et al. in Prot Mater 53:292–298, 2012) [1]. A large number of methods for sustainable disposal of red mud was developed, however, it a tendency to use the red mud in other production process, up to 20 % of it until 2025. The potential for utilization of red mud is seen making masonry products, ceramic tiles, in replacement of a part of cement or aggregate, as a component in self-compacting concretes, geopolymers. The paper provides a review of the developed methods for storage of red mud, with a goal of sustainability and cost-effectiveness. Simultaneously, the paper provides the review of potential application of red mud as a component of building materials. In the experimental part was considered the usage of red mud as a mineral admixture for making self-compacting concrete.

Keywords

Red mud Environmental problem Bayer’s process Sintering process Sustainability Cement Concrete 

Notes

Acnowledgments

The work reported in this paper is a part of investigation within the research project TR 36017 “Utilization of by—products and recycled waste materials in concrete composites in the scope of sustainable construction development in Serbia: investigation and environmental assessment of possible applications” supported by Ministry for Science and Technology, Republic of Serbia. This support is gratefully acknowledged.

References

  1. 1.
    B. Zlatičanin, M. Vukčević, M. Krgović, I. Bošković, M. Ivanović, R. Zejak, The characteristics of geopolymer on the basis of red mud as a component of raw material mixture. Prot. Mater. 53(4), 292–298 (2012)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    R.K. Paramguru, P.C. Rath, V.N. Misra, Trends in red mud utilization- a review. Mineral Process. Extr. Metall. Rev. 26, 1–29 (2005). Copyright ©Taylor & Francis inc. ISSN: 0882-7508 print, doi: 10.1080/08827500490477603
  3. 3.
    International Aluminium Institute, Coordinated by AMIRA (International The Australian Minerals Industry Research Association), May 2006Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    G. Power, M. Gräfe, C. Klauber, Bauxite residue issues: I. Current management, disposal and storage practices. Hydrometallurgy 108, 33–45 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    L. Wanchao, C. Xiangqing, L. Wangxing, Y. Yanfen, Y. Kun, Environmental assessment, management and utilization of red mud in China. J. Cleaner Prod. 84, 606–610 (2014)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Yanju Liu, Ravi Naidu, Hidden values in bauxite residue (red mud): recovery of metals. Waste Manage. 34, 2662–2673 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    L. Wanchao, The advancement and developing of red mud utilization in China. Zhengzhou Research Institute of CHALCO, For ICSOBA, Krasnoyarsk (2013)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
  9. 9.
    K. Gruiz, E. Vaszita, V. Feigl, É. Ujaczki, O. Klebercz, A. Anton, Environmental risk of red mud contaminated soil in Hungary, C.1-Fate, transport and risksGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Alumina Technology Roadmap, International aluminium institute Bauxite and alumina Committee, 2010 Update http://bauxite.world-aluminium.org/uploads/media/fl0000422.pdf
  11. 11.
  12. 12.
  13. 13.
    D.C. Goldberg, A.G. Gray, J.C. Hamaker, R.J. Raudebaugh, J.D. Ridge, R.J. Runk, Processes for extracting alumina from nonbauxite ores. Alkaline Processes for low grade bauxites and clays, No. NMAB-278. National Academy of Sciences-National Academy of Engineering, Washington, D.C. (1970)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    H. Sutar, S.C. Mishra, S.K. Sahoo, A.P. Chakraverty, H.S. Maharana, Progress of red mud utilization: an overview. Am. Chem. Sci. J. 4(3), 255–279 (2014)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    K.L. Reddy, Principles of engineering metallurgy. Extraction of non-ferrousmetals, ed. by K.K. Gupta (Ed) ISBN: 81–224-0952-0, 2001, New Age International (P) Ltd., Daryaganj, New Delhi, India: Sarasgraphics, New Delhi, 3-35Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Yong Liu, Chuxia Lin, Wu Yonggui, Characterization of red mud derived from a combined Baye Process and bauxite calcination method. J. Hazard. Mater. 146, 255–261 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    F. Ćatović, Crveni mulj kao dodatak građevinskim materijalima, 3rd International Scientific Meeting E-GTZ 2016 Tuzla, June 02–04, pp. 3–10 (2016)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    S. Rai, K.L. Wasewar, J. Mukhopadhyay, C. Kyoo Yoo, H. Uslu, Neutralization and utilization of red mud for its better waste management. Arch. Environ. Sci. 6, 13–33 (2012)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    G. Power, M. Gräfe, C. Klauber, Bauxite residue issues: I. Current management, disposal and storage practices. Hydrometallurgy 108, 33–45 (2011)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    V.V. Mitic, V. Paunovic, V. Pavlovic, L. Zivkovic. Sintering process influence on microstructure and intergranular impedance of rare-earth modified BaTiO3-ceramics. Sci Sinter. 43(3), 277–287 (2011). doi: 10.2298/SOS1103277M
  21. 21.
    V.V. Mitić, L. Kocić, V. Paunović, V. Pavlović, Fractal corrections of BaTiO3-ceramic sintering parameters, Sci. Sint. 46(2), 149–156 (2014)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    N. Obradović, S. Filipović, V. Pavlović, M. Mitrić, S. Marković, V. Mitić, N. Orević, M.M. Ristić, Isothermal sintering of barium-zinc-titanate ceramics. Ceram. Int. 37(1), 21–27 (2011). doi: 10.1016/j.ceramint.2010.07.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    N. Labus, N. Obradović, T. Srećković, V. Mitić, M.M. Ristić, Influence of mechanical activation on synthesis of zinc metatitanate. Sci. Sinter. 37(2), 115–122 (2005). doi: 10.2298/SOS0502115LIF(2007)=0.481 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
  25. 25.
    C.C. Youh, Red mud. Iron source for the cement industry, vol. 17 Kuangye (Taipei, Taiwan, 1973), pp. 25–7 (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    G. Wargalla, Use of red muds in manufacture of cement and expanded clay. World of Metallurgy–ERZMETALL 26, 18–20 (1973).Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    S. Shimano, T. Koga, Utilization of red mud as raw material for the cement industry. Light Metals (Warrendale, PA, United States, 1980) pp. 53–68Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    C. Shi, P.K. Krivenko, D. Roy, Alkali-activated cements and concretes. (Taylor & Francis, NY, USA, 2006)Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Z. Pan, L. Cheng, Y. Lu, N. Yang, Hydration products of alkali-activated slag-red mud cementitious material. Cement. Concrete. Res. 32, 357–62 (2002)Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Z. Pan, D. Li, J. Yu, N. Yang, Properties and microstructure of the hardened alkaliactivated red mud-slag cementitious material. Cement. Concrete. Res. 33, 1437–41 (2003)Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Y. Pontikes, G.N. Angelopoulos, Bauxite residue in cement and cementitious applications: current status and a possible way forward. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 73, 53–63 (2013)Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    L. Senff, D. Hotza, J.A. Labrincha, Effect of red mud addition on the rheological behaviour and on hardened state characteristics of cement mortars. Constr. Build. Mater. 25, 163–170 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    R.C. de Oliveira, C.R.C. Rossi, Concretes with red mud coarse aggregates. Mater. Res. 15(3), 333–340 (2012)Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    D.V. Ribeiro, C.A.D. Rovere, C.A.C. Souza, S.E. Kuri, J.A. Labrincha, J.C.C. Abrantes, M. R. Morelli, Effect of redmud on the corrosion of reinforced concrete studied by electrochemical impedance spectroscopy. Int. Scholarly Res. Network ISRN Mater. Sci. 2011, p 11 doi: 10.5402/2011/365276 (2011)
  35. 35.
    D.V. Ribeiro, J.A. Labrincha, M.R. Morelli, Effect of the addition of red mud on the corrosion parameters of reinforced concrete. Cem. Concr. Res. 42, 124–133 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    S.A. Barbhuiya, P.A.M. Basheer, M.W. Clark, G.I.B. Rankin, Effects of seawater-neutralised bauxite refinery residue on properties of concrete. Cem. Concr. Compos. 33, 668–679 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Luping Tang, Study of the possibilities of using Red Mud as an additive in concrete and grout mortar, R-14-04 (Chalmers University of Technology, Swedish Nuclear Fuel and Waste Management Co, Stockholm, 2014)Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    R.R. Rathod, N.T. Suryawanshi, P.D. Memade, Evaluation of the properties of red mud concrete. Second International Conference on Emerging Trends in Engineering (SICETE), India, pp. 31–34 (2009)Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    A.B. Sawant, M.B. Kumthekar, S.G. Sawant, Utilization of neutralized red mud (industrial waste) in concrete. Int. J. Inventive Eng. Sci. (IJIES) 1(2), 9–13 (2013)Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    V. Cablik, Characterization and applications of red mud from bauxite processing. Gospodarka Surowcami Mineralnymi, pp. 27–37 (2007)Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    R.X. Liu, C.S. Poon, Utilization of red mud derived from bauxite in self-compacting concrete. J. Clean. Prod. 112, 384–391 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    K.K. Shetty, G. Nayak, V. Vijayan, Effect of red mud and iron ore tailing on the strength of self compacting concrete. Eur. Sci. J. 10(21) ISSN: 1857 – 7881 (Print) e - ISSN 1857 – 7431Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    W. Hajjaji, S. Andrejkovicova, C. Zanelli, M. Alshaaer, M. Dondi, J.A. Labrincha, F. Rocha, Composition and technological properties of geopolymers based on metakaolin and red mud. Mater. Des. 52, 648–654 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    N. Ristić, Z. Grdić, G. Topličić-Ćurčić, D. Grdić, I. Despotović, Properties of SCC made with the addition of waste materials as mineral admixture conference: contemporary materials and structures with regulations. National conference with international participation, Proceedings, DIMK of Serbia, CIP 691:66.017(082), 620.1:691(082), ISBN 978-86-87615-07-6, COBISS.SR-ID 224025356, UDK: 691.328.5, 66.972.16, Belgrade, 17th June, pp. 11–20 (2016)Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    SPPS EN 206-1:2011 Concrete—part 1: specification performance, production and conformity, Institute for standardization of Serbia, 2011Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    SRPS EN 12620:2010 Aggregates for concrete, Institute for standardization of Serbia, 2010Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    SRPS EN 12350-6:2010 Testing fresh concrete—part 6: density, Institute for standardization of Serbia (2010)Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    SRPS EN 12350-7:2010 Testing fresh concrete—part 7: air content—pressure methods, Institute for standardization of Serbia (2010)Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    SRPS EN 12350-8:2012 Testing fresh concrete—part 8: self-compacting concrete—slump-flow test, Institute for standardization of Serbia (2012)Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    SRPS EN 12350-10:2012 Testing fresh concrete—part 10: self-compacting concrete - L box test, Institute for standardization of Serbia (2012)Google Scholar
  51. 51.
    SRPS EN 12350-11:2012 Testing fresh concrete—Part 11: self-compacting concrete—Sieve segregation test, Institute for standardization of Serbia (2012)Google Scholar
  52. 52.
    SRPS EN 12390-3:2010 Testing hardened concrete—part 3: compressive strength of test specimens, Institute for standardization of Serbia (2010)Google Scholar
  53. 53.
    SRPS EN 12390-5:2010 Testing hardened concrete—part 5: flexural strength of test specimens, Institute for standardization of Serbia (2010)Google Scholar
  54. 54.
    SRPS EN 12390-6:2012 Testing hardened concrete—part 6: tensile splitting strength of test specimens, Institute for standardization of Serbia (2012)Google Scholar
  55. 55.
    SRPS EN 12504-2:2008 Testing concrete in structures—part 2: non-destructive testing—determination of rebound number, Institute for standardization of Serbia (2008)Google Scholar
  56. 56.
    SRPS EN 1542:2010 Products and systems for the protection and repair of concrete structures—test methods—measurement of bond strength by pull-off,, Institute for standardization of Serbia, 2010Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Atlantis Press and the author(s) 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Gordana Topličić-Ćurčić
    • 1
  • Vojislav Mitic
    • 2
    • 3
  • Dušan Grdić
    • 1
  • Nenad Ristić
    • 1
  • Zoran Grdić
    • 1
  1. 1.Faculty of Civil Engineering and ArchitectureUniversity of NišNišSerbia
  2. 2.Faculty of Electronic EngineeringUniversity of NišNišSerbia
  3. 3.Institute of Technical SciencesSerbian Academy of Science and ArtBelgradeSerbia

Personalised recommendations