Skip to main content

Fundamental Principles

  • Chapter
Clinical Forensic Medicine

Abstract

Although medicine is an international discipline, practiced in much the same way throughout the English-speaking world, laws vary considerably from country to country. Much of the law applicable in the United States and in the countries of the Commonwealth derives from the English common law, but medical practitioners should not assume that the laws of their own countries or states will necessarily apply in other countries or states even if medical practices are indistinguishable. In this chapter, the author attempts to establish principles of general applicability; however, it is written from the perspective of the law applicable in England and Wales and should be read with that in mind.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. St George’s Healthcare NHS Trust v S [1998] 3WLR 936, 950E per Judge LJ.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Airedale NHS Trust v Bland [1993] AC789, 857 per Lord Keith of Kinkel.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Ibid. per Lord Goff of Chieveley, 864.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Ibid. per Lord Browne-Wilkinson, 882.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Ibid. per Lord Mustill, 891.

    Google Scholar 

  6. S. v McC and M; W v W [1972] AC 24 per Lord Reid, 43.

    Google Scholar 

  7. St George’s Healthcare NHS Trust case [ibid.], 951G.

    Google Scholar 

  8. General Medical Council. Seeking patients’ consent: the ethical considerations. The General Medical Council, London, UK, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  9. St George’s Healthcare NHS Trust case [ibid], 969C.

    Google Scholar 

  10. In re Cibid. 1WLR 290.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Sidaway v Board of Governors of the Bethlem Royal and Maudsley Hospitals [1985] AC 871; [1985] 1 AllER 643.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Rogers v Whitaker [1992] 175 CLR 479; [1992] AMLD 6993; 16 BMLR, 148 (Australian High Court).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Canterbury v Spence [1972] 464 F2d 772 (US App DC).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Reibl v Hughes 114 DLR 3d 1 (Canadian Supreme Court 1980); [1980] 2 SCR 880.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Bolitho v City & Hackney Health Authority [1998] AC 232; [1998] 1 Lloyd’s Rep. Med. 26.

    Google Scholar 

  16. In re Fibid. [1990] 2.AC 1.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Bolam v Friern Hospital Management Committee [1957] 2 AllER 118; [1957] 1 WLR 582.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Gillick v West Norfolk & Wisbech Area Health Authority [1984] AC 112.

    Google Scholar 

  19. General Medical Council. Making and using visual and audio recordings of patients. General Medical Council, London, UK, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Extract from the Hippocratic Oath. 5th century BC.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Extract from The Declaration of Geneva. World Medical Association, 1948, restated 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Extract from The International Code of Medical Ethics. World Medical Association, Geneva, Switzerland, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  23. General Medical Council. Good medical practice. General Medical Council, London, UK, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  24. General Medical Council. Confidentiality. General Medical Council, London, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Association of Police Surgeons and British Medical Association. Revised interim guidelines on confidentiality for police surgeons in England, Wales and Northern Ireland. Association of Police Surgeons (now the Association of Forensic Physicians), East Kilbride. British Medical Association, London, UK, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Tarasoff v Regents of the University of California [1976] P 551 2d 334 (Cal. Sup. Ct. 1976).

    Google Scholar 

  27. W v Egdell [1990] Ch. 359; [1990] 1 All ER 835.

    Google Scholar 

  28. National Justice Compania Naviera SA v Prudential Assurance Co. Ltd. (“The Ikarian Reefer”); (The Times, March 5, 1993); [1993] 2 Lloyd’s Rep. 68 (High Court 1993); [1995] 1 Lloyd’s Rep. 455 (CA 1995).

    Google Scholar 

  29. Expert Witness Institute. Newsletter. EWI, London, UK, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Whitehouse v Jordan [1981] 1WLR 246, 256 per Lord Wilberforce.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Polivitte Ltd v Commercial Union Assurance Co. [1987] plc 1 Lloyd’s Rep. 379, 386 per Garland J.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Derby & Co. Ltd. and Others v Weldon and Others (No. 9) The Times, November 9, 1990 per Staughton LJ.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Expert Witness Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Civil Procedure Rules. The Stationery Office, London, 1999; and on the Department of Constitutional Affairs (formerly Lord Chancellor’s Department). Available at Website: (http://www.dca.gov/uk).

  35. Re N [1999] Lloyds Law Reports (Medical) 257; [1999] EWCA Civ 1452.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2005 Humana Press Inc., Totowa, NJ

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Palmer, R.N. (2005). Fundamental Principles. In: Stark, M.M. (eds) Clinical Forensic Medicine. Forensic Science and Medicine. Humana Press. https://doi.org/10.1385/1-59259-913-3:037

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1385/1-59259-913-3:037

  • Publisher Name: Humana Press

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-58829-368-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-59259-913-4

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics